ZHE HAN TOH1, WENG HANG WONG1, QING LONG GU1, KAI-HSIANG CHUANG2, KUAN-JIN LEE2, JULIAN GAN3, and PHUA HWEE TANG1
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, KK WOMEN'S AND CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL, SINGAPORE, Singapore, 2Singapore Bio-Imaging Consortium, A*STAR, SINGAPORE, Singapore, 3Siemens Healthcare, Regional Headquarter, SINGAPORE, Singapore
Synopsis
We compared 3
versions of Arterial Spin Labelling (ASL) available ( single-TI 3D-PASL,
multi-TI 3D-PASL and 2D-pCASL) on 3T Siemens MRI scanner Skyra in 10 normal healthy adults with normal body
mass index (BMI) at 3 different time points (baseline, 1 week later, 2 to 3
month later). There was good
replicability of all 3 ASL techniques (correlation coefficients range from 0.55
to 0.77). Values acquired with these ASL techniques agree with the published
normal range of cerebral blood flow values in adults. There is no significant difference in the CBF
obtained with single-TI 3D-PASL, multi-TI 3D-PASL and 2D-pCASL.Purpose
Arterial Spin
Labelling (ASL) is a non-invasive MRI technique for the quantification of
tissue perfusion using freely diffusible intrinsic tracer. Measurement of
regional cerebral blood flow (CBF) with ASL can be performed by different
acquisition methods. The aim of this study was to compare the replicability of relative
CBF acquired by single TI 3D pulsed arterial spin labelling (3D-PASL), multi-TI
3D-PASL and 2D pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling (2D-pCASL) prior to
use in clinical research.
Methods
This study was
approved by the institutional review board and written consent was obtained. Ten
healthy adult females (aged 20 to 37 years; average 25.1 years; median 24
years) were invited for MRI scan 1 week apart with a follow up scan done 2 to 3
months later. All individuals had normal body mass index and were scanned on a
3T MR scanner (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare) with a 32-channel
phased-array receive-only head coil. High-resolution anatomical images were
acquired using sagittal 3D MPRAGE and coronal T2-weighted 3D SPACE. All
individuals were scanned with single and multi-TI 3D-PASL ASL using FAIR
labelling with Q2TIPS and 2D-pCASL with PICORE QUIPPS II.
ASL images were post-processed by FMRIB Software
Library (FSL, www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl)
for motion correction and smoothing. Anatomical whole-brain mask was created
for each subject to linearly and non-linearly register MPRAGE to standard space
(MNI152 template). Relative CBF image was registered to the MNI152 template
through linear and non-linear registration of the M0 image to MPRAGE using FSL.
Custom Matlab scripts (Mathworks, MA, USA) were used to calculate the mean CBF
in the 59 areas of the cerebral hemispheres
based on Harvard-Oxford atlas, including whole-brain CBF value. The cerebellum
was excluded as 2D-pCASL had limited coverage. Calculated CBF values were
compared with age-matched reference range values published for adults as there
is known variation of CBF with age. The statistical analysis on IBM SPSS
Statistics version 19 included one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA - Bonferroni
post hoc test) to compare the CBF values acquired by different ASL acquisition
methods. To check replicability and reliability of the ASL techniques, the first set of ASL scans were compared with those
done 1 week later and follow-up scans done 2 to 3 months later. The
significance level was set as p≤0.05.
Results
The mean whole brain CBF values obtained with
single TI 3D-PASL, multi-TI 3D-PASL and 2D-pCASL at baseline, 1 week later and
2 to 3 months later are presented in Table 1 to 2 and Figures 1 to 3.
Correlation
coefficient of all scans at baseline with those done at 1 week is 0.77 while
correlation coefficient of all scans done at baseline with those done at 2 to 3
months is 0.62 and correlation coefficient for scans at 1 week with those done
at 2 to 3 months is 0.55.
Correlation
coefficient between single-TI and multi-TI 3D-PASL is 0.53, between single-TI
3D-PASL and 2D-pCASL is 0.52, between multi-TI 3D-PASL and 2D-pCASL is 0.31.
There was no
statistical difference between baseline scans and those done 1 week later as
well as in those done 2 to 3 months later (all p values>0.2).
One-way ANOVA
statistical analysis also showed no significant difference in the CBF values
obtained by single-TI 3D-PASL, multi-TI 3D-PASL and 2D-pCASL (all p
values>0.2).
Discussion
In our study, CBF
measurements of healthy subjects using single TI 3D-PASL is 56.02±6.66
mL/100g/min, using multi-TI 3D-PASL is 51.74±5.58 mL/100g/min and 51.40±7.05 mL/100g/min
using 2D-pCASL. The published literature shows that the normal
range of 3D-PASL CBF for adults is between 36.2-63.3 mL/100g/min 1, 2
and 2D-pCASL is between 40-100 mL/100g/min 3. Our values agree with
the published normal range of CBF values in adults. Scans repeated 1 week and 2
to 3 months later demonstrated good replicability of all 3 ASL techniques.
3D ASL offers better
spatial localization of areas of interest compared to 2D-pCASL and is able to
provide whole brain coverage. Multi-TI 3D-PASL enables detailed quantification
of cerebral perfusion across different time points as compared to single-TI and
potentially may be useful in patients with altered perfusion such as vascular
stenosis when the optimal TI may be longer than usual.
Conclusion
This study
demonstrates that ASL is a promising non-invasive technique for quantitation of
cerebral perfusion with good replicability.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Hales PW, Kawadler JM, Aylett SE, et al. Arterial Spin Labeling Characterization of Cerebral Perfusion during
Normal Maturation from Late Childhood into Adulthood: Normal ‘Reference Range’
Values and Their Use in Clinical Studies. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. 2014 May; 34(5): 776–784.
2. Wang J, Licht DJ, Jahng GH, et al.
Pediatric Perfusion Imaging using Pulsed Arterial Spin Labeling. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2003 Oct; 18(4):
404–413.
3. Alsop DC, Detre JA, Golay X, et al. Recommended
Implementation of Arterial Spin-Labeled Perfusion MRI for Clinical
Applications: A Consensus of the ISMRM Perfusion Study Group and the European
Consortium for ASL in Dementia. Magn Reson Med. 2014 Apr 8.