Lee Bremner Reid1, Martin V Sale2, Ross Cunnington2,3, and Stephen E Rose1
1e-Health Research Centre, CSIRO Health and Biosecurity, Brisbane, Australia, 2Queensland Brain Institute, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 3School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Synopsis
Detecting neuroplasticity
requires highly sensitive measurements that may be outside the bounds of
standard parcellation-seeded tractography. Earlier attempts to measure
neuroplasticity induced by motor learning have utilised voxelwise analyses.
Such analyses are reliant on precise registration, can have low statistical
power, and provide little certainty as to the functional relevance of areas of
detected change. We have measured motor-learning-induced neuroplasticity along
corticomotor and thalamocortical tracts using fMRI-seeded diffusion-MRI, finding
that changes uniquely occur in the corticomotor tract. Unlike previous
analyses, we reveal that these changes occur throughout the corticomotor tract,
not just near the grey-/white-matter interface.Purpose
Very few longitudinal
studies have investigated white matter changes associated with motor-skill
learning. Of those reported, most have focussed on visuo-motor regions and
utilised voxel-based morphometry or tract-based spatial statistics.
1
Change has been reported near the grey-/white-matter interface, but these
analyses are reliant on accurate registration, provide little certainty as to the
functional relevance of an area, and can have low statistical power.
Parcellation-seeded tractography can provide another way to seed specific
tracts, but will include fibres innervating functionally-irrelevant muscles,
and so may be too insensitive to detect change. We sought to measure
neuroplastic change, in subjects who learned a novel non-visual motor task, by
using fMRI-guided diffusion MRI.
Methods
T1 (MPRAGE), HARDI (64
directions; b=3000s/mm2), and task-based fMRI images were collected
from 23 healthy adults immediately before and after four weeks of practicing a (10min/day)
finger-thumb opposition task with their non-dominant hand. Subjects were
processed individually. For each brain, a mesh of the grey-matter/white-matter
interface was created from T1 tissue-segmentations. Functional MRI analyses
were performed entirely on the mesh, without reslicing, to avoid implicit or
explicit cross-sulcal smoothing that could affect tractography. An 8mm FWHM
surface smoothing was used. Learned and unlearned finger-thumb
opposition-sequence blocks were pooled and contrasted with rest blocks. T-value
meshes were then moved into dMRI space and triangles of three connected statistically-significantly
activated (p<0.05 FWE) nodes were used to define seeding regions for tractography
(Figure 1 & 2). Activation outside of the primary sensorimotor cortex
(S1M1) was discarded. Tractography was restricted to the thalamocortical and corticospinal
tracts with manually drawn inclusion masks of the thalamus, posterior limb of
the internal capsule, and brain stem. The mesh surface was used to proactively constrain
tractography to white matter. As corticomotor and thalamocortical tracts often
can pass through the same voxels near the midbrain, k-means clustering was used
to classify each track as either corticomotor or thalamocortical, based on node
locations near these ROIs. Fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD)
values were calculated for each voxel. To assess diffusion metrics, for each
tract, voxels passed through were classified into seven bins, based on their
mean proportional distance along the tracts (Figure 3). Voxels with an FA below
0.2 were excluded. A GLM was then used to determine whether change of FA or MD
occurred in each bin between sessions, controlling for subject. Each voxel’s
contribution to this linear model was weighted by the proportion of tracks that
passed through it.
Results
Sequence performance rates were
similar before training (p=0.34; Paired TTest). After training, the trained
sequence was performed 40% faster than the untrained-sequence (p<0.0001),
and performance for both sequences improved (both p<0.01). fMRI activation
was consistently in the hand area of S1M1 (Figure 1). Bins were consistently sized and located between sessions and subjects.
FA of the corticomotor tract increased significantly for every bin by 1.8 – 4.7% (all p<0.05, Holm-Bonferroni
adjusted for multiple comparisons; Figure 4). MD of the corticomotor tract
decreased in six of seven bins by -0.15% to -1.75%, increasing only near the
internal capsule (0.58%), but these changes did not consistently reach
statistically significance. No consistent trend of change in FA or MD was seen
for the thalamocortical tract.
Discussion
This study has
demonstrated white-matter changes induced by motor learning, by utilising a novel
data processing pipeline that allows diffusion metrics of sensorimotor tracts to
be compared between both subjects and time points. This method does not rely on
voxel-perfect registration. This is important, as both type-I and type-II
errors might otherwise be introduced through reslicing and/or registration error,
due to the minute changes that are being measured. We found that FA change in
motor tracts can take place with motor learning, and found no consistent change
in thalamocortical tracks. Unlike previous studies, our fMRI-guided method provides
confidence that the areas of change are functionally relevant. We also demonstrated
that this change occurs across the full length of the motor tract and so is
unlikely to be due to partial volume contamination by grey matter (registration
error). This suggests that learning is not purely due to highly-local rewiring
of the cortex; connections to the alpha motor neurons themselves may strengthen.
It is known that electrical impulses can induce myelination in vivo within a
two week period.
2 Given the pattern of change observed after four weeks
of motor training, we cautiously speculate that activity-induced myelination of
the white matter tracts may have taken place. Future studies utilising
myelin-water imaging may ascertain whether this mechanism plays a role in motor
learning.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1 Chang, Y., 2014. Reorganization and plastic changes of the human brain associated with skill learning and expertise. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 35. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00035
2 Ishibashi, T., Dakin, K. a, Stevens, B., Lee, P.R., Kozlov, S. V, Stewart, C.L., Fields, R.D., 2006. Astrocytes promote myelination in response to electrical impulses. Neuron 49, 823–32. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.02.006