Synopsis
Accurate identification
of the thalamus sub-structures is therefore important for localization of
specific nuclei and for the understanding of brain function. However, sub-structures
of the thalamus are so small and have intermediate signal characteristics
between grey/white matter it has been difficult to identify them with
conventional MR imaging technique.
In
this work, in-vivo T1 value at 7T are measured using fast T1
mapping technique in less than 2 min and optimized inversion time to generate
optimal contrast from the thalamus. The optimized results reveal markedly
improved anatomical detail of the sub-structures of the thalamus, including
their detailed locations.Introduction
The
thalamus relays information to the cortex regions and
controls sensori-motor
[1]. Among the sub-structures
of the thalamus, nucleus ventro-intermedius(V.im) and ventral posterior lateral
nucleus(VPL) are important target regions for DBS
[2].
Accurate identification of the thalamus sub-structures is therefore important for
localization of specific nuclei and for the understanding of brain function. However,
sub-structures of the thalamus are so small and have intermediate signal characteristics
between grey/white matter (GM/WM) it has been difficult to identify them with
conventional MR imaging technique. Previous
studies have suggested segmenting nuclei by means of the local relaxation times
[3]. Tissue signal suppression using inversion
recovery (IR) technique provides a useful tissue contrast particularly tissue
is surrounded by the other tissues which have different T
1. However,
it has been limited by the difficulty of obtaining high-resolution and
high-contrast images at lower filed-strength.
Stronger magnetic field strength leads
to a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and allowing for high-resolution MR imaging.
Because of increased T
1 at 7T, it is necessary to understand T
1
of thalamus. Several studies measured T
1 at 7T but show large
variations
[4-6]. Moreover, measuring T
1
at 7T is challenging due to the long acquisition time.
In this work, 1) in-vivo T
1
at 7T are measured using fast T
1 mapping technique, IR prepared EPI
sequence with slice reordering
[7,8], in
less than 2 min and 2) optimized inversion time (TI) to generate optimal
contrast from the thalamus. The optimized 7T images reveal substantially
improved anatomical detail of the thalamus sub-structures.
Methods
Data were collected from 4 controls
in a 7T MRI (Siemens; IRB approved) with a 32-receive channel head coil (Nova Medical). Similar data acquisition scheme, an IR-EPI
sequence with slice reordering, was used for the T
1 mapping
[7,8]. A non-slice selective adiabatic inversion pulse
is applied followed by 5 interleaved slices (Fig. 1A). Due to low SNR of
navigator echoes near the null point in IR sequence, data fitting for N/2
ghosting correction has not performed well (Fig. 1B). To improve SNR of
navigator echo, it was separately acquired before the start of the IR-sequence.
The scan parameters were 80 slices, resolution=1.2×1.2×1.5mm
3. To
generate T
1 maps, data were processed using a voxel-wised single
exponential fitting
[8]. After
generating T1 maps, mean T
1 value was measured in GM, WM masks
(generated from the T
1 map segmented by SPM5) and the thalamus (manually
drawn).
TIs for MPRAGE
[9] were estimated using simulation based on measured
T
1 values. Then, TIs were jittered to find maximum signal
suppression in GM, WM and clearly delineate thalamus sub-structures. Scan
parameters were TR/TE = 6000/2.99 ms
and resolution = (0.75mm)
3.
Results
Compared to the results using
conventional navigator-echo acquisition (Fig. 1B), proposed method reveals
qualitatively reduced N/2 ghosting artifact (Fig. 1C). A typical T1
map from a control subject is shown in Fig. 1D. As shown, GM and WM are clearly
delineated in T1 map. Measured mean T1 values (and
standard deviation) in the GM/WM/thalamus from 4 controls were 1851.2 (±153.6), 1178.6 (±336.5) and 1455.5 (±150.259)
ms. Mean T1 value of thalamus is similar with median value of GM and
WM (=1514.5ms).
Estimated TIs and transverse
magnetization plots based on measured T1 values are shown in Fig. 2A.
Estimated TIs for GM-/WM-suppression and thalamus visualization were
1250/800/1000 ms respectively. Figures
2B-D show practically optimized TIs and resulting images. The TI (=930ms),
designed to suppress mean T1 of the thalamus, also suppressed GM/WM
border line (Fig. 2C).
Thalamus
images using different TIs are shown in Fig. 3. Besides the obvious landmark
structures such as the corpus callosum and internal capsule, sub-structures of thalamus
were also clearly identified (labeled).
Discussions and Conclusions
In this study, T
1 values
of the in-vivo brain were investigated using IR-EPI sequence to establish parameters
for optimal thalamus sub-structures contrast at 7T. The IR-EPI sequence can
cover a whole brain volume in less than 2 min. Measured mean T
1
value of thalamus (=1455.5ms) is similar to the median value of WM (=1178.6ms)
and GM (=1851.2ms). It can be explained by tissue characteristics of the thalamus,
gray matter but parts of thalamus have high axonal density. The optimized results
show markedly improved anatomical detail of the sub-structures of the thalamus,
including their detailed locations. These evidences suggest it may help us to
better understand the brain anatomy in non-invasive way and provide clinically
useful information. The estimated TIs show good similarity with practically
acquired values but have a difference. It can be explained by individual
variation of T
1. The future extension, fast T
1-mapping
(using IR-EPI sequence) with high-performance processing computer could provide
improved tissue contrast optimization using “real-time” individual T
1-map.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Cleveland Clinic. Author
gratefully acknowledges technical support by Siemens Medical Solutions.References
[1] Dimitri Renard,
‘Thalamic Lesions: A Radiological Review’, Behavioural
Neurology, Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 154631, doi:
10.1155/2014/154631.
[2] Vaillancourt
DE, Sturman MM, Verhagen Metman L, Bakay RA, Corcos DM, “Deep brain stimulation
of the VIM thalamic nucleus modifies several features of essential tremor”, Neurology.
2003, 61(7):919-25.
[3] Deoni
SCL, Rutt BK, Parrent AG, Peters TM (2007): Segmentation of thalamic nuclei
using a modified k-means clustering algorithm and high-resolution quantitative
magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 T. Neuroimage 34(1), 117-126
[4] V. N.
Ikonomidou, P. van Gelderen, J. A. de Zwart, J. H. Duyn, “T1 measurements at 7T
with application to tissue specific imaging”, ISMRM, 2006, 920
[5] T-Q. Li,
S. C. Deoni, “Fast T1 Mapping of the Brain at 7T with RF Calibration Using
Three Point DESPOT1 Method”, ISMRM, 2006, 2643
[6] P. J.
Wright, O. E. Mougin, J. J. Totman, A. M. Peters, M. J. Brookes, R. Coxon, P.
E. Morris , M. Clemence, S. T. Francis, R.W. Bowtell, P. A. Gowland, “Water
proton T1 measurements in brain tissue at 7, 3, and 1.5T using IR-EPI, IR-TSE,
and MPRAGE: results and optimization”, Magn Reson Mater Phy (2008) 21:121–130
[7] Clare and Jezzard, “Rapid
T(1) mapping using multislice echo planar imaging”, MRM, 2001, 45(4), 630-4
[8] Grinstead and
Rooney, “Fast T1 mapping in human brain using inversion recovery EPI with
GRAPPA at 3T and 7T, ISMRM, 2008, 3084
[9] Mugler, J.P.,
Brookeman, J.R., 1990. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn.
Reson. Med. 15, 152–157.