Neville D Gai1, Yi Yu Chou1,2, Dzung Pham1,2, and John A Butman1
1Radiology & Imaging Sciences, NIH, Bethesda, MD, United States, 2Center for Neuroscience and Regenerative Medicine, Henry Jackson Foundation, Bethesda, MD, United States
Synopsis
Arterial
spin labeling is typically performed with segmented k-space acquisition schemes
to reduce B0 inhomogeneity related distortion. Non-segmented techniques offer the
advantage of higher SNR/time allowing greater
brain coverage in shorter scan times. Here we use a modified 3D EPI acquisition
scheme along with pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling to correct for B0
inhomogeneity related distortion. By employing phase encoding along opposite
directions in alternating control-label pairs and with subsequent
post-processing, we correct for the distortion. CBF images were compared with
GM masks obtained from relatively distortion free MPRAGE images to show
improved localization of the CBF maps. Purpose
To
implement and evaluate blip reversed non-segmented 3D EPI pseudo-continuous arterial
spin labeling (PCASL) for reduced susceptibility artifacts.
Introduction
Pseudo-continuous
arterial spin labeling (PCASL) is the method of choice in arterial spin
labeling due to its superior labeling efficiency and SNR as well as compatibility
with RF transmission hardware [1]. For the readout module of ASL, non-segmented
(single-shot) 3D EPI acquisition offers higher SNR efficiency and reduced
variation in signal arising from phase inconsistencies in multi-shot
techniques. However, one drawback is image distortion resulting from static
field inhomogeneity and susceptibility. Among distortion correction techniques, blip reversal provides a simple yet effective means
for correction without the need to explicitly obtain field inhomogeneity maps[2,3]. It has been successfully applied to DWI using 3D EPI acquisition[4].
Methods
3D
single-shot EPI acquisition with PCASL was modified so that the first set of
tagged and control images were acquired with ky space traversed from
–ky to +ky (blip-up) while a second pair was acquired
with ky space acquisition reversed (blip-down). Eight volunteers were scanned on a 3T Philips
Achieva scanner using a 8 channel head coil. The PCASL 3D EPI sequence used
had the following parameters: PCASL: label dur = 1.65 s, label delay = 1.8 s;
ACQ: FOV = 24 ×
20 cm, res: 3×3×4mm3, EPI TR/TE =
22/11ms, centric kz encoding, SENSE (y) = 2.5, 30 slices, phase
encoding (R/L), spectral-spatial excitation pulse θ=25° with optimal flip
angle train for reduced blurring[5], 34 dynamics, scan time: 4:50. A
single background suppression (BS) adiabatic inversion pulse was used at TI=1.8
s after the initial saturation pulse. In Bloch simulations, the normalized magnetization
was 0.85,
0.96 and 0.52 in gray matter(GM), white matter(WM) and cerebrospinal fluid(CSF), respectively, without this inversion pulse and was 0.37, 0.62 and 0.09 with the inversion
pulse.
The post-processing
pipeline included the following steps: (a) 3D rigid registration of images to
the first acquired BU or BD control image using FLIRT [6]. (b) All labeled and
control BU, BD images were summed to get 4 sets of images. (c) Distortion
correction[2,3] was performed using information from the four sets. (d)
Finally, control images were subtracted from labeled images to get reduced
distortion cerebral blood flow (CBF) images.
To ascertain
reduction in distortion, a GM mask was prepared from relatively distortion free
3D MPRAGE images after 3D registration, skull stripping [7] and segmentation
[8] for each slice and overlaid with CBF images. The number of voxels which
overlapped in matched GM from MPRAGE and CBF images from the three sets (BU, BD
and distortion corrected) was counted over the entire brain for all eight
volunteers. Student’s t-test (matched, 2-tailed) was done to check for
significant differences between the voxels overlapping the GM mask.
Results
Figure 1 shows six
slices (every fifth slice of 30) of distortion corrected CBF maps.
Non-segmented 3D EPI achieves full brain coverage in <5 minutes.
Figure 2 shows the comparison
between the distortion corrected images and the uncorrected images in a single
slice. In the control
images, the distortion along the phase encoding direction (R/L) is clearly
evident, particularly in the frontal lobes and ventricles. The asymmetry of the
frontal horns and the signal pileup in the frontal white matter is corrected by
following application of the distortion correction algorithm. A
similar distortion is seen in CBF images. The bottom
row shows the overlap of the cortical gray matter mask with the thresholded
perfusion map. Ideally, all voxels in the gray matter mask should
correspond to highly perfused tissue.
There were 5% more
voxels matching with the mask in the distortion corrected images when compared
with BU and 3.2% more when compared to BD images. There were significant
differences between the BU and BD CBF maps when compared with the distortion
corrected CBF maps (p=0.0001 and p=0.018, respectively) indicating
significantly improved localization of the CBF signal.
Discussion
No additional scan time was required when compared with standard EPI acquisition since a number of dynamic phases are always employed for ASL. By interleaving the BU-BD acquisitions, we reduced misregistration between the two due to motion. Spectral-spatial RF excitation pulse was favored over a fat saturation (FS) pulse since residual fat signal shifted into the brain (when FS is used) made distortion correction difficult. Additional signal loss due to signal dephasing in regions of strong field offset was not taken into account.
Conclusion
Performing
distortion correction on non-segmented 3D EPI acquisition should provide
comparable localization of CBF as segmented acquisition based
techniques while providing higher SNR efficiency.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] D.C. Alsop et al.
MRM 2015; 73:102-116. [2] H. Chang et al. IEEE TMI 1992; 11:319-329. [3] P. Morgan et al. JMRI 2004; 19:499-507. [4] D. Gallichan
et al. MRM 2010; 64:382-390. [5] N.D.
Gai et al. JMRI 2011; 33:287-295. [6]
J. Modersitzki et al., Int. J Comp. Vis.
2008; 76:153-163. [7] A. Carass et al. Neuroimage
2011; 56:1982-1992. [8] C. Ledig et al. Med.
Imag. Anal. 2015; 21:40-58.