Bogdan Dzyubak1, Yogesh K. Mariappan2, Kevin J. Glaser1, Sudhakar K. Venkatesh1, and Richard L. Ehman1
1Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 2Royal Philips, Bangalore, India
Synopsis
Specialized spin-echo-based sequences have
been developed to perform MRE in patients with short T2* where traditional MRE
fails. This work demonstrates that these sequences are able to salvage such
exams by improving SNR and MRE inversion confidence to the levels of successful
GRE MRE exams. Additionally, the stiffnesses calculated by spin-echo and
spin-echo-echo-planar acquisitions are equivalent to each other.Introduction
One of the biggest
sources of failure for hepatic MR Elastography (MRE) is low magnitude image
signal which leads to noisy wave data and uninterpretable elastograms. This
failure occurs in approximately 4% of exams
1 and can be caused by issues
such as iron overload or anemia. Specialized spin-echo-based acquisitions have
been designed to increase the MR signal in patients with short T2*. In an
earlier study, we demonstrated that these acquisitions do not result in a stiffness
bias when applied to patients with normal liver signal.
2 This study
investigates the ability of these new sequences to allow stiffness
quantification in patients in which the standard GRE acquisition failed due to
low MR signal.
Methods
This retrospective study
used clinical data acquired during the period between March 2013 and September
2015 in accordance with our institutional review board. During this period, SE
and SE-EPI data were acquired in addition to standard GRE MRE for all patients.
For all clinical analysis, low-SNR areas are masked out from the elastogram
analysis using an MRE inversion confidence threshold of 0.95. The automated
tool ALEC,3 which is the standard method of MRE analysis at our institution,
was used to determine cases in which GRE MRE had a low inversion confidence
(<30% of the liver with confidence level >0.95) and the SE and SE-EPI MRE
data were available. Cases with non-signal-related failure (e.g., driver
disconnection or patient motion) were excluded, leaving a set of 48 exams. Liver
segmentations were performed automatically, with manual modification when
necessary, and GRE, SE, and SE-EPI images
were compared in terms of the following:
1. SNR: average signal within the liver divided by the signal standard
deviation in the liver.
2. Confidence level: average confidence level (between 0 and 1) of the MRE inversion within
the liver.
3. Normalized
high-confidence area (NHCA): number of liver voxels with
>0.95 inversion confidence divided by the total number of voxels in the
liver.
These parameters were also
calculated in 130 successful GRE MRE images retrieved from a smaller
overlapping time period for comparison. In cases where GRE MRE had low signal but
both SE and SE-EPI were successful (NHCA>30%), liver stiffnesses were
calculated from automated ROIs and compared between the spin-echo sequences
using a paired equivalence t-test (using JMP9.0, Cary, NC) with a significance level
of 0.05 and an equivalence margin of 5% of the measured stiffness. All acquisitions
were performed at 1.5 T using 60 Hz motion.4
Results and Discussion
An example of the images obtained with the three
sequences on a patient with low GRE MRE signal is shown in Figure 1. The
spin-echo sequences provided sufficient signal to produce reliable liver
stiffness measurements. As can be seen from Figure 2 and Figure 3, the SNR and confidence levels in patients with low liver signal are very
low, while the specialized SE and SE-EPI acquisitions improve the signal to the
level of successful GRE MRE exams. The SE and SE-EPI sequences salvaged 44/48
and 45/48 exams, respectively, by increasing NHCA to over 30%. Using SE, 3
cases continued to have low signal and 1 case had an unrelated driver problem. In
SE-EPI, 2 continued to have low-signal and 1 case, different from the one which
failed in SE, had a driver problem. The stiffnesses calculated from the SE and
SE-EPI exams are shown in Figure 4. The mean and standard deviation of the stiffnesses
were 3.39 ± 1.92 kPa and 3.46 ± 1.80 kPa, respectively, and were equivalent
with a p<0.001 at a 5% equivalence margin. Stiffness values for these
patients were reported clinically based primarily on the SE data. The causes of
signal-related GRE MRE failure were not investigated as the majority of exams
were effectively salvaged by the use of spin-echo sequences. The specialized
spin-echo sequences provide an effective means of imaging patients with iron
overload, metallic implant, or other conditions which lead to low liver signal,
and may have a greater impact at 3T. Since GRE signal-related failure is
relatively infrequent (<5% of cases), GRE is likely to remain the standard
for 1.5T 2D MRE.
Conclusions
This study has demonstrated that specialized
spin-echo sequences enable MRE to be performed in cases where standard GRE MRE
fails by bringing the SNR and confidence to the levels characteristic of
successful GRE MRE exams. This complements our previous study which
demonstrated that SE and SE-EPI sequences provide unbiased stiffness estimates
compared to GRE MRE in exams with normal signal levels. This further supports
the use of specialized spin-echo-based sequences to reduce the failure rate of
MRE exams.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by NIH EB07593, NIH EB001981References
(1) Yin M, Glaser
KJ, Talwalkar JA, Chen J, Manduca A, Ehman RL. MR Elastography of the Liver: Hepatic
MR Elastography: Clinical Performance in a Series of 1377 Consecutive
Examinations. Radiology. 2015. [E-pub].
(2) Dzyubak
B, Mariappan YK, Glaser K, Venkatesh SK,
Ehman RL. Evaluation of spin-echo based sequences for MR Elastography of Liver
with Iron Overload. Proceedings of
ISMRM. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2015.
(3) Dzyubak B,
Venkatesh SK, Manduca A, Glaser K, Ehman RL. Automated Liver Elasticity
Calculation for MR Elastography. JMRI. 2015 [E-pub].
(4) Mariappan YK,
Glaser KJ, Hubmayr RD, Ehman RL, Levin DL, McGee KP. MR Elastography of Human
Lung Parenchyma: Feasibility of
Echo-Planar Elasticity Imaging. Proceedings
of ISMRM. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. 2012.