Synopsis
This study evaluated the
ability of Bloch-Siegert B1
mapping to improve the accuracy and precision of variable flip angle
(VFA)-derived T1
measurements of the breast at 3.0 T. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing VFA T1 values to inversion
recovery measurements in a cohort of 16 healthy women. A reproducibility
analysis from test-retest sessions within the same cohort was used to evaluate
precision. After Bloch-Siegert B1
correction, accuracy of T1
measurements in the fat and fibroglandular tissue improved and measurement variability
decreased. Thus, these results suggest that Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping is an attractive correction method for quickly
obtaining accurate and precise measurements of T1 values of the breast at 3.0 T.Purpose
To evaluate the accuracy and precision of variable flip angle (VFA)
T1 estimates in the breast
before and after correcting for
B1
inhomogeneities using the Bloch-Siegert shift.
1 Because the VFA technique yields rapid, high-resolution
T1 maps
2, it is often used in clinical applications of quantitative DCE-MRI
data of the breast.
3 Unfortunately, the
accuracy of the VFA-derived
T1 values is affected by
B1 transmit
inhomogeneities
2, which can be substantial in breast imaging at 3T.
4 We previously reported preliminary data suggesting the
Bloch-Siegert
B1 mapping
technique improved the accuracy of VFA
T1
measurements in phantoms and in the breast of a healthy volunteer.
5 We have extended the study to further test the
hypothesis that Bloch-Siegert
B1
mapping improves the accuracy of VFA
T1
measurements of the breast in a cohort of healthy volunteers. To test the
hypothesis that Bloch-Siegert
B1
mapping improved measurement precision, the same cohort was enrolled in a
test-retest study.
Methods
Test-retest
MRI sessions were performed using a 3T Philips Achieva MR scanner equipped
with a two-channel body coil and a 16-channel receive double-breast coil
(MammoTrak, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) on 16 women (mean: 44
years, range: 25-67) with no history of breast disease. Each scanning session
lasted approximately 30 minutes with a 10-minute rest period in between.
T1 was measured from 3D
spoiled gradient echo images with multiple flip angles (10 flip angles = 2,4,6…20°;
matrix = 192×192; FOV = 256×256×50 mm
3; 10 slices, TR/TE = 7.9/4.6
ms).
B1 field variations were
measured using the Bloch-Siegert method with a 2 ms frequency-swept B
1 phase encoding pulse
6 with matched slices (RMS B
1 = 2.29 mT; matrix = 104×102;
TR/TE = 491/5.4 ms). As a gold standard,
T1
was also measured using a single-slice inversion recovery (IR) sequence (12
inversion times between 25-10,000 ms; matrix = 128×91; FOV = 256×256 mm
2).
Fat and fibroglandular tissue (FGT) were segmented from the IR image where the
signal intensity of the FGT was null, and mean
T1 values from both tissue regions were calculated for
each imaging technique and scan session. The effect of
B1 correction on accuracy was evaluated by calculating the
percent error (%err), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and bootstrap
95% confidence interval
7 (CI) for the mean differences in absolute deviation between
IR- and VFA-derived
T1
values (with and without
B1
correction). For reproducibility, the
95% CI of the mean difference, within-subject standard deviation (wSD), and
repeatability coefficient (
r) of the
test-retest sessions were calculated.
Results
Figure
1 is a representative test-retest set of
T1
maps generated from IR (left column), uncorrected VFA (center column), and
B1-corrected VFA (right
column). Large spatial variations in
T1
values of the FGT are observed in the uncorrected VFA maps, which are minimized
after
B1 correction. After
B1 correction, %err
decreased from 20% to 9% and CCC increased from 0.55 to 0.83. Similar trends in
accuracy were observed in the fat (see Table 1). The bootstrap 95% CIs for FGT
and fat are 57.8 ms to 139 ms and 17.2 ms to 42.2 ms, respectively; both values
for each CI are positive which indicates that the absolute deviation from IR is
smaller after
B1
correction for both ROIs. Figure 2 shows Bland-Altman plots for each imaging
technique and tissue. After
B1
correction, the 95% CI, wSD, and r
decreased from ±94 ms to ±38 ms, 100 ms to 40 ms, 276 ms to 111 ms,
respectively. Similar trends were again observed in the fat (see Table 1).
Discussion
The
Bloch-Siegert method of
B1
mapping improves the accuracy of
T1
measurements derived from VFA data in the breast. Previous simulation results reported large errors in DCE-MRI parameters (e.g.,
Ktrans) due to inaccuracies in
T1.
8 Therefore, improvements in accuracy are imperative in order
to lower the error associated with the precontrast
T1 measurement in quantitative analyses of DCE-MRI data.
Reproducibility experiments are important in order to define the associated
variability in a measurement so that future studies can be designed and powered
appropriately. Our data show that Bloch-Siegert
B1 mapping improves the reproducibility of VFA-derived
T1 measurements in the breast
thereby improving measurement precision.
Conclusion
These
data, combined with other preliminary reports
5,9, indicate that
B1
mapping using the Bloch-Siegert method is an attractive option for accurate and
precise VFA-derived measurements of
T1
in the breast at 3T. Furthermore, our protocol acquires 3D
T1 and
B1 maps in less than three minutes which is ideal for
clinical applications. Future work includes employing the
B1 mapping method described herein in an ongoing
clinical study
3 of breast cancer
patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Acknowledgements
R25CA092043,
U01CA142565, U01CA174706
References
1. Bloch F, Siegert A. Magnetic Resonance
for Nonrotating Fields. Phys Rev 1940;57:522-527.
2. Brookes
JA, Redpath TW, Gilbert FJ, et al. Accuracy of T1 measurement in dynamic
contrast-enhanced breast MRI using two- and three-dimensional variable flip
angle fast low-angle shot. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9(2):163-171.
3. Li X,
Abramson RG, Arlinghaus LR, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
for predicting pathological response after the first cycle of neoadjuvant
chemotherapy in breast cancer. Invest Radiol 2015;50(4):195-204.
4. Kuhl
CK, Kooijman H, Gieseke J, et al. Effect of B1 inhomogeneity on breast MR
imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology 2007;244(3):929-930.
5. Whisenant
JG, Arlinghaus LR, Dortch RD, et al. B1+ Field Mapping Improves Accuracy of T1
Measurements in Phantoms and Normal Breast at 3.0 T. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson
Med 2015;23.
6. Jankiewicz
M, Gore JC, Grissom WA. Improved encoding pulses for Bloch-Siegert B1(+)
mapping. J Magn Reson 2013;226:79-87.
7. Efron
B. Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Ann Stat 1979;7(1):1-26.
8. Di
Giovanni P, Azlan CA, Ahearn TS, et al. The accuracy of pharmacokinetic
parameter measurement in DCE-MRI of the breast at 3 T. Phys Med Biol
2010;55(1):121-132.
9. McLean
M, Patterson A, Bedair R, et al. T1 mapping in the breast, with a Bloch-Siegert
correction for variation in transmitted B1. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med
2014;22.