Bloch-Siegert B1-mapping Improves Accuracy and Precision of T1 Measurements in the Breast at 3T
Jennifer G Whisenant1, Richard D Dortch1, Lori A Arlinghaus1, William A Grissom1, Hakmook Kang1, and Thomas E Yankeelov1

1Vanderbilt, Nashville, TN, United States

Synopsis

This study evaluated the ability of Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping to improve the accuracy and precision of variable flip angle (VFA)-derived T1 measurements of the breast at 3.0 T. Accuracy was evaluated by comparing VFA T1 values to inversion recovery measurements in a cohort of 16 healthy women. A reproducibility analysis from test-retest sessions within the same cohort was used to evaluate precision. After Bloch-Siegert B1 correction, accuracy of T1 measurements in the fat and fibroglandular tissue improved and measurement variability decreased. Thus, these results suggest that Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping is an attractive correction method for quickly obtaining accurate and precise measurements of T1 values of the breast at 3.0 T.

Purpose

To evaluate the accuracy and precision of variable flip angle (VFA) T1 estimates in the breast before and after correcting for B1 inhomogeneities using the Bloch-Siegert shift.1 Because the VFA technique yields rapid, high-resolution T1 maps2, it is often used in clinical applications of quantitative DCE-MRI data of the breast.3 Unfortunately, the accuracy of the VFA-derived T1 values is affected by B1 transmit inhomogeneities2, which can be substantial in breast imaging at 3T.4 We previously reported preliminary data suggesting the Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping technique improved the accuracy of VFA T1 measurements in phantoms and in the breast of a healthy volunteer.5 We have extended the study to further test the hypothesis that Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping improves the accuracy of VFA T1 measurements of the breast in a cohort of healthy volunteers. To test the hypothesis that Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping improved measurement precision, the same cohort was enrolled in a test-retest study.

Methods

Test-retest MRI sessions were performed using a 3T Philips Achieva MR scanner equipped with a two-channel body coil and a 16-channel receive double-breast coil (MammoTrak, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) on 16 women (mean: 44 years, range: 25-67) with no history of breast disease. Each scanning session lasted approximately 30 minutes with a 10-minute rest period in between. T1 was measured from 3D spoiled gradient echo images with multiple flip angles (10 flip angles = 2,4,6…20°; matrix = 192×192; FOV = 256×256×50 mm3; 10 slices, TR/TE = 7.9/4.6 ms). B1 field variations were measured using the Bloch-Siegert method with a 2 ms frequency-swept B1 phase encoding pulse6 with matched slices (RMS B1 = 2.29 mT; matrix = 104×102; TR/TE = 491/5.4 ms). As a gold standard, T1 was also measured using a single-slice inversion recovery (IR) sequence (12 inversion times between 25-10,000 ms; matrix = 128×91; FOV = 256×256 mm2). Fat and fibroglandular tissue (FGT) were segmented from the IR image where the signal intensity of the FGT was null, and mean T1 values from both tissue regions were calculated for each imaging technique and scan session. The effect of B1 correction on accuracy was evaluated by calculating the percent error (%err), concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), and bootstrap 95% confidence interval7 (CI) for the mean differences in absolute deviation between IR- and VFA-derived T1 values (with and without B1 correction). For reproducibility, the 95% CI of the mean difference, within-subject standard deviation (wSD), and repeatability coefficient (r) of the test-retest sessions were calculated.

Results

Figure 1 is a representative test-retest set of T1 maps generated from IR (left column), uncorrected VFA (center column), and B1-corrected VFA (right column). Large spatial variations in T1 values of the FGT are observed in the uncorrected VFA maps, which are minimized after B1 correction. After B1 correction, %err decreased from 20% to 9% and CCC increased from 0.55 to 0.83. Similar trends in accuracy were observed in the fat (see Table 1). The bootstrap 95% CIs for FGT and fat are 57.8 ms to 139 ms and 17.2 ms to 42.2 ms, respectively; both values for each CI are positive which indicates that the absolute deviation from IR is smaller after B1 correction for both ROIs. Figure 2 shows Bland-Altman plots for each imaging technique and tissue. After B1 correction, the 95% CI, wSD, and r decreased from ±94 ms to ±38 ms, 100 ms to 40 ms, 276 ms to 111 ms, respectively. Similar trends were again observed in the fat (see Table 1).

Discussion

The Bloch-Siegert method of B1 mapping improves the accuracy of T1 measurements derived from VFA data in the breast. Previous simulation results reported large errors in DCE-MRI parameters (e.g., Ktrans) due to inaccuracies in T1.8 Therefore, improvements in accuracy are imperative in order to lower the error associated with the precontrast T1 measurement in quantitative analyses of DCE-MRI data. Reproducibility experiments are important in order to define the associated variability in a measurement so that future studies can be designed and powered appropriately. Our data show that Bloch-Siegert B1 mapping improves the reproducibility of VFA-derived T1 measurements in the breast thereby improving measurement precision.

Conclusion

These data, combined with other preliminary reports5,9, indicate that B1 mapping using the Bloch-Siegert method is an attractive option for accurate and precise VFA-derived measurements of T1 in the breast at 3T. Furthermore, our protocol acquires 3D T1 and B1 maps in less than three minutes which is ideal for clinical applications. Future work includes employing the B1 mapping method described herein in an ongoing clinical study3 of breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Acknowledgements

R25CA092043, U01CA142565, U01CA174706

References

1. Bloch F, Siegert A. Magnetic Resonance for Nonrotating Fields. Phys Rev 1940;57:522-527.

2. Brookes JA, Redpath TW, Gilbert FJ, et al. Accuracy of T1 measurement in dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI using two- and three-dimensional variable flip angle fast low-angle shot. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9(2):163-171.

3. Li X, Abramson RG, Arlinghaus LR, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for predicting pathological response after the first cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Invest Radiol 2015;50(4):195-204.

4. Kuhl CK, Kooijman H, Gieseke J, et al. Effect of B1 inhomogeneity on breast MR imaging at 3.0 T. Radiology 2007;244(3):929-930.

5. Whisenant JG, Arlinghaus LR, Dortch RD, et al. B1+ Field Mapping Improves Accuracy of T1 Measurements in Phantoms and Normal Breast at 3.0 T. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2015;23.

6. Jankiewicz M, Gore JC, Grissom WA. Improved encoding pulses for Bloch-Siegert B1(+) mapping. J Magn Reson 2013;226:79-87.

7. Efron B. Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. Ann Stat 1979;7(1):1-26.

8. Di Giovanni P, Azlan CA, Ahearn TS, et al. The accuracy of pharmacokinetic parameter measurement in DCE-MRI of the breast at 3 T. Phys Med Biol 2010;55(1):121-132.

9. McLean M, Patterson A, Bedair R, et al. T1 mapping in the breast, with a Bloch-Siegert correction for variation in transmitted B1. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med 2014;22.

Figures

Representative test-retest set of T1 maps generated from inversion recovery (left column), uncorrected variable flip angle (center column), and B1-corrected variable flip angle data (right column). Note the large spatial variations in T1 values across the fibroglandular tissue in the uncorrected variable flip angle maps, which are minimized after B1 correction.

Bland-Altman plots illustrate the test-retest results for each imaging technique and tissue. Note the lower variability, as measured by the smaller 95% confidence interval and repeatability index, observed in the B1-corrected variable flip angle data compared to the uncorrected variable flip angle.

Accuracy and precision results for the fat and fibroglandular tissue.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3293