Repeatability of Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting on T1 and T2 quantification with the NIST/ISMRM standardized relaxation phantom
Yun Jiang1, Dan Ma2, Kathryn E. Keenan3, Karl Stupic3, Vikas Gulani1,2, and Mark A. Griswold1,2

1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Clevleand, OH, United States, 2Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Clevleand, OH, United States, 3Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, CO, United States

Synopsis

In order to promote the clinical acceptance of quantitative relaxometry techniques as a valid biomarker, a fast quantitative method that can measure the relaxation parameters with high repeatability is needed. This study evaluates the repeatability of MRF with the standardized relaxometry phantom developed through collaboration between the ISMRM Ad Hoc Committee on Standards for Quantitative MR and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) over 35 consecutive days. A less than 5% variation on T1 and T2 estimations of MRF was observed in NIST standardized phantoms with a wide range of T1 and T2 values.

Purpose

Quantitative relaxometry has shown promise for characterizing pathology1, and monitoring treatment effects2. However, the differences in T1 and T2 values between healthy and diseased tissues can be very small. In order to promote the clinical acceptance of quantitative relaxometry techniques as a valid biomarker, a fast quantitative method that can measure the relaxation parameters with high repeatability is needed. At the same time, a relaxometry phantom with stable T1 and T2 values is also necessary to evaluate the performance of any quantitative method. Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting (MRF)3 is a promising method in the quantification of T1 and T2 simultaneously with high efficiency. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the repeatability of MRF with the standardized relaxometry phantom developed through collaboration between the ISMRM Ad Hoc Committee on Standards for Quantitative MR and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)4. The phantom has SI-traceable components and is monitored by NIST for stability and accuracy.

Method

The NIST phantom has 3 layers of sphere arrays that are designed to have the standardized T1, T2 and proton density. The T1 arrays are made of different concentrations of NiCl2 solutions, and T2 arrays are made of MnCl2 solutions. It was scanned with FISP-based MRF method5 using Siemens Skyra 3 T scanner (Siemens AG Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a 20-channel head-neck receiver array. The MRF method has the varied flip angles from 5° ~ 75°. The repetition times change from 12 to 15 ms. A total of 3000 frames were acquired for each slice, resulting in a scan time of 40 seconds per slice. Bloch simulations generated a dictionary containing all possible signals covering T1 values from 20 ms to 3000 ms, and T2 values from 2 ms to 800 ms. The phantom was placed in the magnet for 30 minutes to stabilize the fluid before the acquisition. Two slices with the in-plane spatial resolution of 1.2 × 1.2 mm2, and the slice thickness of 5 mm were scanned over T1 and T2 arrays of the NIST phantom. The experiment was repeated over 35 consecutive days to evaluate the repeatability of MRF-FISP method.

Results

Figure 1 shows T1 and Figure 2 shows T2 values over 35 consecutive days of the measurement. The precision was calculated by the percent change of the standard deviation normalized by the mean T1 and T2 values of 35 days. The precision of the estimation of T1 and T2 values of MRF-FISP method are plotted in Figure 3. It shows that MRF measures a wide range of T1 and T2 values with less than 5 % variations, except for the shortest relaxation times.

Discussion

A less than 5% variations on T1 and T2 estimations of MRF was observed in NIST standardized phantoms with a wide range of T1 and T2 values over 35 consecutive days. The result from the T2 array phantom has more variations than the results from T1 array. The observed variations could relate to small temperature fluctuations day-by-day because it is known that NiCl2 based T1 arrays are less sensitive to the temperature changes compared to the T2 arrays made of MnCl2. More study would be needed to further analyze the temperature dependence of these phantoms.

Conclusions

NIST/ISMRM standardized relaxometry phantom can be the ideal phantom for evaluating the repeatability of the quantitative relaxometry method. The current study shows that MRF has excellent repeatability across 35 days over a wide range of T1 and T2 values.

Acknowledgements

The authors (YJ, DM, VG and MG) would like to acknowledge funding from Siemens Medical Solutions and NIH grants 1R01EB017219, 1R01EB016728.

References

1. Roebuck JR. et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 27 (2009), 497–502

2. Weidensteiner et al. BMC Cancer (2014), 14:88

3. Ma D. et. al. Nature (2013) 495, 187–192

4. Russek SE, Boss MA, Jackson EF, et al. Characterization of NIST/ISMRM MRI System Phantom. Proceedings of the 20th meeting of the ISMRM, Melbourne, Australia, 2012.

5. Jiang Y. et. al. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25559.

Figures

Figure 1. T1 values of T1 layer phantom over 35 consecutive days.

Figure 2. T2 values of T2 layer phantom over 35 consecutive days.

Figure 3. The precisions of a) T1 and b) T2 estimation. The precision is calculated the percent change of the standard deviation normalized by the mean values of the measurements of 35 days.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3292