Eddy Solomon1, Gilad Liberman1, Noam Nissan2, and Lucio Frydman1
1Chemical Physics Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel, 2Biological Regulation Department, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Synopsis
A
recently proposed single-shot MRI methodology, SPatio-temporal ENcoding
(SPEN), was evaluated for its usefulness in DTI experiments. SPEN’s direct
image acquisition is not bound by k-space sampling criteria, thereby enabling
the use of stronger gradients during its monitoring of the low-bandwidth
dimension. This helps it to overcome
image distortions arising from field inhomogeneities, eddy currents and
heterogeneous chemical environments. Single-shot and interleaved DTI SPEN measurements
were tested under various pre-clinical and clinical settings, and the formalism
needed to extract reliable DTI maps from SPEN data was derived. Substantial advantages
in terms of overcoming EPI distortions were observed.Introduction
MRI
is commonly used to measure water’s diffusivity in opaque matter. In
anisotropic tissues molecules tend to diffuse more freely along the principal
axis of fibers than in the perpendicular planes [1]. To characterize such
anisotropic molecular motions, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) applies pulsed
gradient echoes along multiple directions. Since DTI aims to describe the
effects introduced by random molecular displacements spanning sub-mm ranges, ultrafast
single-shot imaging techniques play key roles in this field. In most cases, and foremost in clinical
applications, spin-echo echo planar imaging (SE EPI) is the method of choice
for performing these rapid, diffusion-monitoring scans. However, SE-EPI can be
challenged by eddy-current
artifacts
and by geometric distortions and ghosting effects related to field and chemical
shift heterogeneities [2]. Recently, we have presented the diffusion-monitoring
capabilities of an alternative single shot method, derived from spatiotemporal
encoding (SPEN) principles [3]. Thanks to its reliance on a direct image
acquisition that is not bound by k-space
Nyquist sampling criteria, SPEN enables the use of stronger gradients along the
low-bandwidth dimension, overcoming image distortions arising from B0-inhomogeneities
and heterogeneous chemical environments [4-5]. The purpose of this study was to
evaluate the usefulness of
single-shot and interleaved SPEN methods to perform DTI under various
pre-clinical and clinical settings. Additionally, the present study describes the
formalism for analyzing SPEN DTI data, tailored to account for the
spatially-dependent b-matrix
weightings introduced by the sequence’s use of swept pulses acting in the
presence of field gradients [7].
Methods
To examine
SPEN DTI’s performance, a number of systems were tested including ex vivo
spinal cord and brain measurements, in vivo rodent brain mappings, and
breast DTI scans of healthy volunteers. Phantom
and rodents experiments were performed on an Agilent DD2® 7T/110mm
pre-clinical horizontal magnet (Agilent Technologies, CA) using a
quadrature-coil probe. Human breast DTI SPEN experiments were programmed and
acquired at 3T on a Siemens TrioTIM® scanner (Erlangen, Germany), using a
4-channels bilateral breast receiver coil. This study compared SPEN and SE-EPI DTI results, from
experiments including both single- and interleaved multi-shot acquisitions. Explicit calculations for the b-matrix
elements were carried by programming scripts accounting for all gradient and
pulse waveforms.
Results and Discussion
To
evaluate the usefulness of SPEN DTI analyses several SPEN strategies were adapted. The first (Figure 1A) incorporated an adiabatic 180˚ encoding pulse
suitable for multi-slice imaging. A second sequence (Figure 1B) involved a 2D spatial/spatial
pulse acting in unison with an encoding gradient Ge, progressively excites
spins throughout the sample [6]. Figure 2 illustrates the eddy-currents effects for
DTI pulse sequence using relatively short diffusion timings (δ
= 3 ms, ∆ = 11 ms) yet relatively high bPGSE values (1200
s/mm
2) reaching 43.2 G/cm. Ex-vivo
coronal rat brain for SEMS (Fig. 2A) and SPEN based on a 180
0 chirp encoding
(Fig. 2B) showed similar anatomical information; for SE-EPI, by contrast, the fractional
anisotropy (FA) maps were clearly distorted by the effects of eddy current
interferences (Fig. 2C). These effects could not be avoided unless extending
either δ or ∆, at the expense of longer echo times. Figure
3 presents diffusion properties measured for a human lactating breast via apparent
diffusion coefficient (ADC) map (Fig. 3A) and FA map (Fig. 3B). A
vector map
representation of the ensuing principal diffusion eigenvectors (blue arrows in
Fig. 3C) shows an alignment of the diffusivity along the anterior-posterior
axis, reflecting the structure of milk ducts heading from the base of the
breast toward the nipple. Thanks to SPEN’s robustness to field inhomogeneities,
a closer look on this phenomenon is feasible towards the nipple of the breast–a
region challenged by air/tissue interface problems.
Conclusions
This
work demonstrates the robustness of SPEN-based sequences enabling the
implementation of DTI experiments with good sensitivity and resolution for
brain scans and challenging environments like human breasts.
Financial support
Israel
Science Foundation grant 795/13, the EU through ERC-2014-PoC
grant # 633888, the Kimmel
Institute for Magnetic Resonance and the generosity of the Perlman Family
Foundation, are also acknowledged.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Basser
PJ et al. Magn Reson Med 2000;44(4):625-632. [2] Farzaneh F et al. Magn Reson
Med 1990;14:123–139. [3] Frydman L et al. J Am Chem Soc 2003;125(30):9204-9217. [4] Ben-Eliezer N et al.
Magn Reson Imaging 2009;28(1):77-86. [5] Solomon E et al. Magn Reson Med 2015; 73:2163–2173.
[6] Dumez JN et
al. J Magn Reson 2013;226:22-34. [7] Solomon E et al. Magn. Reson., 2013,
232, 72−82.