Junying Cheng1,2, Yingjie Mei2,3, Biaoshui Liu2, Xiaoyun Liu1, Ed. X. Wu4,5, Wufan Chen1,2, and Yanqiu Feng2,4,5
1School of Automation Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China, People's Republic of, 2School of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of, 3Philips Healthcare, Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of, 4Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Signal Processing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, People's Republic of, 5Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
Current phase-unwrapping algorithms are challenged by rapid phase variations, noise and disconnected regions. We propose a novel phase-unwrapping method based on the observation the phase local difference (pLD) and complex local difference (cLD) maps. The proposed algorithm first clusters pixels into disconnected regions by thresholding the cLD map and then performs local polynominal surface fitting (LPSF) to unwrap phase with the knowledge of wrapping locations identified by thresholding the pLD map. Both simulation and in vivo results demonstrate that the proposed method can correctly unwrapped phase even in the presence of rapid phase variation, low SNR, and disconnected regions, and has great potential application to phase-related MRI in practice.Target
Audience
Researchers who are interested in phase-unwrapping and water-fat separation.
Purpose
Accurate phase-unwrapping is vital for MRI applications such as water-fat separation [1]
and phase imaging [2]. Current phase-unwrapping algorithms
are generally challenged by rapid phase variations, noise and disconnected
regions. In this work, we propose a novel phase-unwrapping method based on the
observation shown in Fig. 1. Let $$$\psi$$$
denote
the phase map in Fig. 1b. The map
of complex local difference (cLD), defined as $$$\sqrt{\sum_{m,n}\mid{angle}\left(\exp\left(1i*\psi\right)_{\left(m,n\right)}*\left(\exp\left(1i*\psi\right)_\left(i,j\right)\right)^*\right)\mid^2}$$$
where
$$$(m, n)$$$ are pixel index in a k×k neighboring window centered at pixel $$$(i, j)$$$, is shown in Fig. 1c, in which high-intensity pixels correspond
to locations with rapid variation of complex vectors, usually at tissue
boundaries (as compared to Fig. 1a). Fig. 1d shows the map of phase local difference
(pLD), defined as the root square of phase
difference between pixel $$$(i, j)$$$
and it surrounding pixels $$$(m, n)$$$,
where high-intensity pixels correspond to locations where phase wraps and/or
varies rapidly. The red pixels in Fig. 1d are obtained by subtracting the cLD
map from the pLD map, and correspond to locations where phase wraps. The
proposed phase-unwrapping algorithm first clusters pixels into disconnected
regions by thresholding the cLD map and then performs local polynominal
surface fitting (LPSF) to unwrap phase with the knowledge of wrapping locations
identified by thresholding the pLD map. For brevity, the proposed method is
denoted as CLOSE (pixel Clustering and
LOcal SurfacE fitting).
Methods
As
shown in Figure 2, CLOSE first clusters the input phase map into two parts by cLD thresholding: disconnected blocks in which
complex vectors change slowly, and residual pixels in which complex vectors
change rapidly. After that, CLOSE sequentially performs intra-block,
inter-block and residual-pixel phase unwrapping. For intra-block unwrapping,
CLOSE segments each block into disconnected subblocks with smooth phase and
residual pixels by pLD theresholding, and performs inter-subblock unwrapping and
then residual-pixel unwrapping using LPSF. The unwrapping starts with the largest
subblock, and proceeds with the closest subblocks and pixels. Inter-block
unwrapping is implemented similar to inter-subblock unwrapping, and the
residual-pixel unwrapping in the whole phase map is similar to residual-pixels
in a block. In both block and subblock
pixel clustering, an empirical threshold
of π/4 was used.
To evaluate the performance of CLOSE under rapid
phase changes, Gaussian phase surfaces with standard deviations (SD) of 50
pixels and height of 50, 100, and 200 rad were synthesized on a 256×256 grid (Fig.
3 first column), and Gaussian noise with SD of π/10 rad was added to these maps.
To evaluate the performance under different SNRs, ring-shaped data with 12
sectors (magnitude increasing from 10 to 120) were synthesized on a 256×256
grid. The phase surface had a Gaussian shape with SD of 50 pixels and height of
20 rad. Gaussian noise with SD of 20 rad was added, resulting in SNRs in
different vectors increasing from 0.5 to 6 with a step of 0.5.
To evaluate the performance
of CLOSE in related MRI, two knee and one ankle 3-point spin-echo Dixon [3] datasets
were obtained with a 0.35-T permanent magnet MR scanner (Xingaoyi Company,
Ningbo, China). Thirteen volunteers were scanned with the following parameters:
TE/TR = 28/580 ms, matrix size 256×256, FOV = 240×240 mm2.
Results
Figure 3 shows the simulation result under different
phase variation levels. PRELUDE [2] produces correct phase maps at low
variation levels (i.e., 50 and 100 rad), but fails at high variation level (i.e.,
200 rad). In contrast, CLOSE generates correct unwrapping results under all three
variation levels. Figure 4 shows that CLOSE successfully unwraps the simulated
data even at a low SNR of 0.5, while PRELUDE-unwrapped results contain residual
wraps when SNR is below 1.5.
Figure
5 shows the result of water-fat separation experiment. Residual wraps can be
seen in PRELUDE-unwrapped phase maps, which leads to water/fat swaps, as pointed by arrows. CLOSE successfully unwrapped phase
even in regions where phase varies rapidly and SNR is low, and produced water
and fat images without significant swaps. Among all subjects
studied, PRELUDE produced 15, 28 and 26 swaps, and CLOSE produced 2, 5 and 5
swaps out of the total 130 sagittal knee, 130 transverse knee and 65 sagittal
ankle images, respectively.
Discussion and conclusion
CLOSE is a novel phase-unwrapping method based on the
difference between local phase variation and local complex data variation. Both
simulation and in vivo results demonstrate that CLOSE can correctly unwrap
phase even in the presence of rapid phase variation, low SNR, and
disconnected regions. CLOSE has great potential
in phase-related MRI applications in practice.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]
Ma J. JMRI: 28 (3): 543-558, 2008.
[2]
Jenkinson M. MRM: 49: 193-197, 2003.
[3]
Glover G, et al., MRM: 18(2): 371-383, 1991.