Ken-Pin Hwang1, Jingfei Ma1, Lloyd Estkowski2, Ann Shimakawa2, Kang Wang2, Daniel Litwiller2, Zachary Slavens2, Ersin Bayram2, and Bruce Daniel3
1Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States, 2MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, United States, 3Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
Synopsis
Separation of silicone, fat, and water is performed by using
a two-step Dixon processing algorithm and a bipolar triple-echo readout in a 3D
FSE sequence. The echoes are spaced for conventional water-fat separation, but
the first and last echoes are also used to generate a phase map with double the
phase evolution for resolving fat from silicone, which are relatively close in
terms of chemical shift. Individual images of each of the three species are
reconstructed in phantom and human data. The proposed method demonstrates
improved SNR efficiency and robustness to field inhomogeneity compared to
conventional saturation and inversion recovery techniques.Introduction
MR plays an important role in evaluating the integrity of
silicone implants and detecting their rupture. This is commonly performed with
saturation or inversion pulses that suppress one or two of the three chemical
species (water, fat, and silicone) that can be imaged with MR. However, such
techniques require long acquisition times and suffer from poor signal. Chemical
shift dependent saturation pulses also tend to fail in areas of high susceptibility.
In this work we propose a two-step Dixon method that produces separate images
of water, fat, and silicone from a triple-echo sequence without the use of
suppression pulses. Moreover, this data can be acquired with a single-pass
Dixon sequence [1] to quickly and efficiently acquire all the required data
without excessive extension of scan time.
Methods and Results
Fast Triple Echo Dixon (FTED) is a Fast Spin Echo technique
that acquires three echoes per phase encode line with a single bipolar readout.
The center echo is timed in-phase with the spin echo, while the outer echoes
are timed such that water and fat are out-of-phase. To separate water from fat,
the first two echoes are processed with a 2-point Dixon algorithm [2], as are the
last two echoes (second and third echoes). The water images from each process
can be magnitude combined to form a single water image, as can the fat images.
Since silicone has a chemical shift relatively close to that
of fat, it is also out of phase with water in the out-of-phase images and hence
remains in the fat image. Fat and silicone are thus also more difficult to
separate. The proposed method accomplishes this in a second step by using a
phase map from the first and third echoes. With an echo spacing twice that of
the usual echo spacing used for water-fat separation, the outer echoes allow
for twice the phase evolution between species, and can better separate fat and
silicone based on chemical shift. Instead of magnitude combining the
fat/silicone images from the first Dixon process, the original phase from the
first and third echoes are restored to generate complex fat and silicone images
with the water removed. Depending on the exact chemical shift of the silicone
compound and the echo spacing achieved in the sequence, the phase evolution of
silicone from the first to third echo could even be out of phase with fat. If
that is the case then fat-silicone separation can be performed using
conventional 2-point Dixon methods. However, we found that the chemical shift
of our silicone samples to be approximately 1.2 times that of fat, and a modified,
flexible TE 2-point Dixon algorithm was applied to better separate the two
species, by modifying the region growing routine to detect discontinuities of
60-90 degrees in phase instead of 180 degrees.
The triple echo acquisition was implemented in a
3D Cube sequence [3], and was run on a fat/water/silicone phantom and a volunteer
subject with silicone breast implants, using a 3.0T whole body scanner (GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) and an 8-channel breast coil. Sequence parameters
were TR = 2000, TE = 100, ETL = 110, FOV = 32cm, matrix = 224x224, slices =
160, slice thickness = 1.4mm, bandwidth = ±125kHz, Dixon echo spacing = 1.232
msec, ARC acceleration = 2x1.5, total acquisition time = 4:25.
Acquired data
was reconstructed with 3-species separation and evaluated. Resulting images are shown in figures 2 and 3. 3-species separation was successful in both phantom and human data.
Discussion
These results demonstrate the feasibility of separating
three chemical species with an efficient triple-echo acquisition and a two-step
Dixon algorithm. Historically, susceptibility has been a major problem with
chemical shift dependent saturation pulses in breast imaging, due to the air interfaces
around the breasts and their close contact with surface coils. Hence saturation
failures can often occur near areas that are prone to rupture. By avoiding
saturation pulses, Dixon separation methods are able to utilize all of the
signal available from the sequence, improving the overall SNR efficiency of the
technique and reducing sensitivity to magnetic field inhomogeneity. While Dixon water-silicone separation may be combined with a STIR
technique to provide water- and silicone-only images [4], the STIR pulse
again reduces available signal and extends acquisition time. The FTED readout
utilized in our study is symmetric about the spin echo and therefore maximizes
the readout efficiency for a fast spin echo based Dixon technique. Since
in-phase and out-of-phase information are all acquired in a single pass, a 3D
acquisition can be acquired in clinically feasible scan times.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Ma J, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 58:103-9.
2. Ma J. Magn Reson Med. 2004; 52:415-9.
3. Busse RF, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2006; 55:1030-7.
4. Madhuranthakam AJ, et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;
35:1216-21.