Jorge E Jimenez1, Kevin M Johnson1, Leah C Henze Bancroft1, Diego Hernando2, Roberta M Strigel1,2, Scott B Reeder2,3, and Walter F Block1,2,3
1Department of Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 2Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, United States, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
Synopsis
We present a 3D T1-Weighted radial trajectory suited to
work with IDEAL fat/water separation. Some relevant characteristics are: rapid acquisition, reliable
fat suppression, and high resolution despite significant data undersampling. The
method is demonstrated in 3T bilateral breast MR imaging where isotropic
resolution of 0.8 mm is achieved. In addition, we show the value of high count
channel array for breast imaging.Introduction
The
volumetric IDEAL IQ[1] (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI) sequence provides
reliable, quantitative fat/water separation and R2* characterization. The need
to repeatedly sample the same k-space lines, however, constrains the spatial
resolution that can be achieved in a clinically feasible scan time, as
illustrated in the comparative description in Table 1. We present advances in a
non-Cartesian approach that solves the spatial resolution limitation while
providing several quantitative parameters. The method is demonstrated in 3T bilateral breast MR imaging, where it
ultimately can serve as an acquisition platform for high performance DCE-MRI
compatible with compressed sensing methodologies.
Theory
We previously presented a
3D radial trajectory–Vastly undersampled Isotropic Projection (VIPR)[2] with
T1-weighting and an out and back acquisition that provides 2 echoes along 2
unique radial lines in each TR. Alternate TRs are time-shifted to effectively
produce an approximate p/2 phase shift for fat between each of four
uniquely sampled adjacent k-space radial lines[3]. The reconstructed radial
echo images are utilized by the IDEAL fat/water decomposition algorithm to
provide the final images—VIPR IDEAL. The radial sampling pattern allows for a
unique set of radial lines to be acquired in each echo (as opposed to the same
lines acquired in Cartesian sampling), which when combined with the efficient
out and back trajectory and radial undersampling, leads to a significant
improvement in resolution.
Methods
Table 2 demonstrates
the image acquisition parameters for each of the 3 sequences. To achieve the
performance advantages in resolution and scan time listed in Table 2 for VIPR
IDEAL relative to the Cartesian IDEAL scan, the PILS effect is exploited through the use of a 16-channel breast
coil. Imaging at 3T allows for faster sampling of the spectral dimension as
compared to 1.5T, which translates to a shorter TR for higher performance.
One normal and one patient volunteer were imaged
using a IRB-approved and HIPAA compliant protocol. The normal volunteer was imaged on a 3T system (Optima 750w, GE Healthcare) with both
an 8-channel breast coil (GE Healthcare, Waukesha WI) and a 16-channel breast
coil (NeoCoil, Pewaukee, WI) using IDEAL IQ and VIPR IDEAL as shown in Figure 1.
The patient volunteer was imaged on 3T system (Discovery 750, GE Healthcare)
with a 16-channel breast coil (Sentinelle, Invivo, Gainsville, FL) (Figures 2
and 3) using IDEAL IQ, T1-W FSPGR Two-point Dixon (standard of care Dixon DCE)
and VIPR IDEAL as described in Tables 1 and 2.
Results
A
comparison of the methods in Figure 2 demonstrates equivalent resolution in the
in-plane, axial dimension between VIPR IDEAL, Cartesian IDEAL IQ and T1-W FSPGR
two-point Dixon. Figure 1(F) and 3(C) shows that isotropic VIPR IDEAL provides
significantly better depiction of fibroglandular detail when reconstructed into
orthogonal planes. The substantial benefit of a larger array of coils to
minimize undersampling aliasing is clearly apparent in the comparison of the 8
and 16-channel sagittal VIPR images. Robust fat/water separation with VIPR IDEAL
is shown throughout.
Discussion
Though demonstrated in
volumetric T1-W imaging, robust fat/water separation with VIPR IDEAL and
Cartesian IDEAL IQ supplies a Proton Density Fat Fraction map (labeled PDFF in
Table 1) that can be exploited in a DCE compressed sensing reconstruction. Moreover,
the B0 maps provided by IDEAL also allow data from multiple echoes to be
correctly combined.
The nearly six-fold voxel
reduction with VIPR causes some loss of SNR in comparison to Cartesian IDEAL,
though this could be mitigated by averaging adjacent slices. Similarly, T1-W FSPGR two-point Dixon scan time combined with
its voxel size put it on par with VIPR IDEAL for SNR and performance. Finally, the
VIPR sampling patterns can be interleaved in a manner compatible with
compressed sensing and reconstructed over varying time intervals with incoherent
artifacts, making it suitable for iterative reconstruction algorithm.
Conclusion
We have
successfully demonstrated the benefits of adding the sampling characteristics
of VIPR in conjunction with IDEAL to obtain high spatial resolution, flexible
echo selection and important quantitative properties. Doubling the receiver channel
configuration produced a substantially greater performance increase for VIPR
relative to the Cartesian methods. Lastly, VIPR IDEAL is a promising acquisition
foundation for further study with a DCE Breast MRI protocol.
Acknowledgements
Research
supported by NIH R25 GM083252 and T32CA009206, RSNA Research & Education Foundation, the
Department of Radiology R & D Fund at the Authors’ Institution, Wisconsin
Women's Health Foundation, and GE Healthcare. Special thanks to Venkat
Goruganti and NeoCoil. References
1. Reeder SB,
Pineda AR,
Wen Z,
Shimakawa A,
et al. Iterative decomposition of water
and fat with echo asymmetry and least-squares estimation (IDEAL): application
with fast spin-echo imaging. Magn Reson Med.
2005 Sep;54(3):636-44.
2.
2. Jimenez
JE, Bancroft LH, Strigel RM, et. al. Non-Cartesian
Compressed Sensing with Fat/Water Decomposition: Feasibility Study for High
Performance Breast DCE-MRI. ISMRM 2015
3.
3. Moran CJ,
Brodsky EK,
Bancroft LH,
et al. High-resolution 3D radial bSSFP
with IDEAL. Magn Reson Med. 2014. v71 pp 95-104.