Benjamin Zahneisen1, Murat Aksoy1, Julian Maclaren1, Christian Wuerslin1, and Roland Bammer1
1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
Synopsis
Simultaneous-Multi-Slab-Imaging is a promising approach for high resolution DW-EPI (<1mm) where the slice profile of a typical multi-band RF-pulse limits the spatial resolution for single-shot DW-EPI. Like every multi-band technique, slab separation during a parallel imaging reconstruction requires a combination of coil sensitivity variation and k-space encoding. The most prominent way is blipped-CAIPIRINHA where k-space encoding along the slice direction is achieved by adding small gradient blips in z-direction to the EPI readout. Here we demonstrate how multi-band RF phase modulation can be used as an alternative way to encode along the slab dimension without affecting intra-slab phase encoding. The use of phase modulated RF-pulses decouples encoding between the logical intra- and inter-slab directions that are otherwise linked because there is only one physical z-gradient axis.Introduction
Simultaneous-Multi-Slab-Imaging
1,2,3 is a promising approach for high resolution DW-EPI (<1mm) where the
slice profile of a typical multi-band rf-pulse limits the spatial resolution
for single-shot DW-EPI. Like every multi-band technique, slab separation during
a parallel imaging reconstruction requires a combination of coil sensitivity
variation and k-space encoding. The most prominent way, and only way in case of
single-shot acquisition, is blipped-CAIPIRINHA
4 where k-space encoding
along the slice direction is achieved by adding small gradient blips in
z-direction to the EPI readout.
Here we demonstrate how multi-band
RF phase modulation
5,6 can be used as an alternative
way to encode along the slab dimension without affecting intra-slab phase encoding. The use of phase modulated RF-pulses decouples encoding between the logical intra-
and inter-slab directions that are otherwise linked because there is only one
physical z-gradient axis.
Theory
Every pixel within a group of
simultaneously excited slabs (Fig.1) can be described by 4 coordinates r=(x,y,z',s), where x and y are the in-plane coordinates, z’
is the distance relative to the center of each slab and s is the position of each slab relative to the
gradient isocenter. The resolution and the intra-slab voxel dimensions Δx,Δy,Δz define the intra-slab k-space. Δzslab is the distance between the centers of Nslab simultaneously excited, non-contiguous slabs. It determines the FOV
along the slice direction by FOVslab=NslabxΔzslab.
Full k-space sampling requires NxxNyxNzxNslabs samples spanning a 4-dimensional k-space
(Fig. 1 b). Each k-space location corresponds to a multi-directional (i.e. 4d) and
mutually orthogonal phase modulation in image space.
In practice, however, there are only 3 independent physical gradient
directions to encode 4 logical directions. The slab dimension and the high-resolution intra slab dimension are both represented by the physical
z-gradient axis and therefore cannot be varied independently. The effective
wave vector along the slice direction is always a sum of
both logical k-space contributions.
Since encoding is solely based on the wave length (k-space value) both
dimensions (i.e. multi-slab and intra-slab) are modulated with an effective
k-space wave k'=kz+kslab.
For the logical z-axis
that means that additional slab encoding (CAIPI-blips) results in small to moderate
deviations from the nominal k-space location (see Figure 2b where the red dots
are slightly shifted relative to the Cartesian grid depicted as gray circles). Imposing the phase modulation along slabs with RF- instead of gradient pulses overcomes this limitation and all four dimensions can be varied independently.
Methods
Images were acquired at 3T using an
8-channel head coil array (GE Healthcare). Multi-band RF excitation was
performed by cosine modulation of a sinc-pulse (3.2ms, bw= 950Hz) and adding a
slice dependent phase prior to complex summation across slices. Each phase
modulation corresponds to a k-space sample along the logical slab dimension (ksms in
Figure 1). For m slabs, m different RF-pulses were generated online,
corresponding to full sampling along the slab direction. RF-waveforms were then updated in real-time between sequence TRs. Sequence parameters for the 3D-EPI sequence were FOVxy=224mm, Nxy=64x64, slab thickness=FOVz=4mm, Nz=4, multi-band factor=3, Δzslab=12mm Reconstruction was performed off-line using a 3D-SENSE method or in case of fully sampled scans by 4d-iFFT.
Results
Figures 2a,b display the magnitude and phase of a multi-band RF-pulse. In c,d the phase modulation relative to b along the slab direction corresponds to k-space coordinates -kmax and kmax + Δk, respectively. Figure 4 displays the reconstruction of 3 simultaneously excited slabs with Nz=4 intra-slab resolution acquired with a 3D-EPI readout using (Nz=4 kz phase encoded) x (m=3 different RF pulses) TR's. The blue rectangles highlight the first group of simultaneously excited slabs, each containing Nz=4 slices. The reconstruction was performed using a 4 dimensional inverse FT. No coil sensitivity information was used. Under sampling can be performed by either skipping RF-pulses or lines/planes of the remaining gradient directions.
Discussion & Comparison between RF-encoding
and blipped-gradient encoding
Using RF-pulses (POMP
5, CAIPIRINHA
6)
to encode the slab dimension in a simultaneous multi slab experiment is an
alternative to blipped gradient encoding in combination with a 3d-EPI
trajectory. It allows sampling on a Cartesian grid for all 4 encoding dimension
and can be used with an unmodified 3d-EPI readout. It further has the potential
to optimize the acquisition by providing more flexibility in terms of
multi-band k-space traversal especially with respect to non-Cartesian
trajectories. It also might help to reduce slice/slab leakage because all k-space values along the slab dimension have identical T2* weighting. The downside of the method is that peak power reduction using PINS pulses is not feasible for RF-encoding because one needs full control over the phase of each slice.
Acknowledgements
NIH (2R01 EB002711 , 5R01 EB008706, 5R01 EB011654), the Center of Advanced MR Technology at Stanford (P41 RR009784), Lucas
Foundation.References
[1] Frost R et al., MRM, 2013. doi:
10.1002/mrm.25062.
[2] Bruce I. et al., Proc.
Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 23 (2015)
[3]
Van AT et al., MRM, 2014.doi: 10.1002/mrm.25169.
[4] Setsompop K. et
al. MRM 2012; 67:1210-1224.
[5] Glover G., Phase-offset multiplanar (POMP)
volume imaging: A new technique, JMRI 1991
[6] Breuer F. et al., MRM 2006