Erpeng Dai1, Xiaodong Ma1, Zhe Zhang1, Chun Yuan1,2, and Hua Guo1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 2Vascular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
Synopsis
Simultaneously multi-slice (SMS) has been a powerful
tool for single-shot EPI DWI acceleration, but still not well established for
interleaved EPI (iEPI) DWI acceleration. The main challenge is how to
effectively combine slice un-folding and inter-shot phase correction. In this
study, a 3D k-space reconstruction method for navigated SMS accelerated iEPI
DWI has been proposed. An optimized acquisition for navigator is designed. Then
slice un-folding and inter-shot phase correction are performed in a SMS 3D
k-space. The performance is compared with ssEPI and un-accelerated iEPI DWI,
and has been shown to be applicable for both 4-sh and 8-sh iEPI DWI.Purpose
Simultaneously
multi-slice (SMS) has been a powerful tool for single-shot EPI (ssEPI) DWI
acceleration, but still not well established for accelerating interleaved EPI (iEPI)
DWI. The main challenge is how to effectively combine slice un-folding and inter-shot
phase correction. Recent studies have proposed several k-space based methods
for iEPI DWI phase correction
1-3, for which inter-shot phase variances
are corrected by interpolation in k-space, based on extra acquired navigators. This
characteristic makes it straightforward to integrate such methods into the SMS 3D reconstruction framework
4. In this study, a 3D k-space
reconstruction method for SMS accelerated iEPI DWI is proposed. A new acquisition
strategy for navigators is designed to accurately estimate inter-shot phase
variance for all simultaneously excited slices. Then slice un-folding and inter-shot
phase correction are performed in a SMS 3D k-space. The performance of the
proposed method is compared with ssEPI and un-accelerated iEPI DWI, and has
been shown to be applicable for both 4-sh and 8-sh iEPI DWI.
Methods
Sequence A previously reported generalized blipped-CAIPI
sequence 1,3 is used in this study, as shown in Fig. 1. The navigator is optimized to reduce its distortion in both phase
encoding and slice selective direction, by using CAIPI under-sampling patterns
and reducing its echo spacing (ESP).
Reconstruction The pipeline of the proposed 3D
k-space reconstruction is shown in Fig. 2. Data with SMS acceleration factor
MB = 3, 2-shot acquisition are shown as an example. For simplicity, the kx and
coil dimension are not shown here. First, the under-sampled navigator of each
shot is recovered to a full SMS 3D k-space (Fig. 2(a)) using traditional GRAPPA
4. Then the weighting matrix (Fig. 2(b)) for slice un-folding and inter-shot
phase correction is calculated from the recovered navigator. For the image
echo, data from different shots are divided into different k-space (from Fig. 2(c)
to (d)). Then the missing data is recovered using k-space interpolation (arrows
in Fig. 2(d)), using the calculated weighting matrix in Fig. 2(b). Here, both
the inter-shot phase variation and coil sensitivity information are used. The fully
recovered 3D k-space data (Fig. 2(e)) are inversely Fourier transformed and
combined over different channels and shots.
Experiments All scans were performed
on a Philips 3.0T Achieva TX MRI scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, The
Netherlands) using a 32-channel head coil. All human studies were performed
under IRB approval from our institution. The imaging parameters for
different acquisitions were summarized in Table 1. For diffusion imaging, diffusion
preparation was applied in 16 directions with b = 800 s/mm2. For
un-accelerated imaging, 4 slices with gap = 16mm were acquired, while for SMS
accelerated imaging, the same slices were covered by simultaneously exciting 2
slices with gap = 36 mm. In this study, the ESP of the navigator was reduced to
half of the image echo, which induced a navigator size of 80×29 (kx×ky), while the size of
the image echo was 216×216.
Data analysis The SNR for msEPI DWI
images with or without SMS acceleration were calculated using the pseudo-multiple
replica method with 128 repetitions 6. FA maps were calculated using
DTIstudio 7 and compared.
Results and Discussion
Fig.
3 shows the DWI image comparisons among ssEPI (a), un-accelerated 8-sh EPI (b),
accelerated 4-sh (c) and 8-sh EPI (d) with MB=2. As shown, the msEPI DWI images
show higher spatial resolution and less distortion (red arrow heads) than ssEPI.
The proposed 3D reconstruction has successfully reconstructed SMS accelerated
4-sh and 8-sh EPI DWI images. The SNR drop from SMS acceleration is also shown from
(e) to (g).
Fig.
4(a) to (d) show the corresponding color-coded FA (cFA) maps, with ssEPI as
references. Both un-accelerated and accelerated 8-sh EPI show more detailed
structures than ss-EPI and 4-sh EPI, especially where severe distortion exists
(yellow arrow heads).
Conclusion
In this study, a 3D k-space reconstruction method
for SMS accelerated iEPI DWI has been proposed for the first time. A new
strategy is first proposed to acquire SMS 3D navigator, which can estimate the
inter-shot phase variance for all simultaneously excited slices. For the
reconstruction, slice unfolding and inter-shot phase
correction are effectively combined into one SMS 3D k-space, which is
novel in concept and easy to implement. The performance of the proposed method
has been demonstrated in iEPI DWI with 4 shots and 8 shots. This method is
promising for high resolution iEPI DWI imaging acceleration, which is valuable
for clinical diagnosis and neuroscience study.
Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61271132,
61571258) and Beijing Natural Science Foundation (7142091).References
[1] Ma X et al. ISMRM 2015; p2799.
[2] Liu W et
al. Magn Reson Med. 2015;00.
[3] Guo H at al. ISMRM Workshop on SMS Imaging
2015.
[4] Zahneisen B, et al. Magn Reson Med 2014;71.
[5] Griswold M a et al. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47(6).
[6] Robson PM, et al.
Magn Reson Med 2008;60.
[7] Jiang H, et al. Comput Methods Programs Biomed
2006;81