Mengye Lyu1,2, Yilong Liu1,2, Victor B. Xie1,2, Yanqiu Feng1,2, Zhe Zhang3, Hua Guo3, and Ed X. Wu1
1Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Signal Processing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, People's Republic of, 2Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, People's Republic of, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
For simultaneous multislice (SMS) PROPELLER, we
propose multi-step joint-blade (MJB) SENSE reconstruction. In MJB SENSE, all
blades are jointly reconstructed in three steps without relying on iterations. Compared
to separately reconstructing individual blades, MJB SENSE substantially reduces
noise amplification and narrow-blade artifact. MJB SENSE is also compatible
with motion correction. With these advantages, MJB SENSE can be used to achieve
very high MB factors in SMS PROPELLER.Introduction
PROPELLER consists of rotatory blades and
is well-known for motion robustness. Previous studies have investigated the
feasibility of SMS PROPELLER by applying SMS in each blade [1, 2]. For reconstruction, SMS slice-separation
can be done within each blade separately, which we denote as simple single-blade
(SSB) approach. However, SSB approach has two limitations: excessive noise may
arise from individual blades; artifact may arise when blades are narrow. Here, we propose multi-step joint-blade (MJB)
SENSE reconstruction, which jointly reconstructs all blades in three steps.
Compared to SSB SENSE, MJB SENSE substantially reduces noise amplification and
the narrow-blade artifact so that high MB factors is feasible.
Methods
Simple Single-Blade SENSE:
The slices are reconstructed using SENSE separately within each blade [2, 3], and motion correction [4] is performed for each slice independently.
The blades are combined with k-space density filtering.
Multi-Step Joint-Blade SENSE:
MJB SENSE consists of three steps as follows (Figure 1).
(1) SSB SENSE is performed. It provides
rough estimations of blade images, blade-combined images, and motion
parameters.
(2) Regularized single-blade SENSE is
performed. It improves the estimations provided by SSB SENSE. From the
blade-combined images, we regenerate two sets of blade images, with and without
coil sensitivity map (CSM) weighting. Dividing the CSM-weighted regenerated
blade images by non-CSM-weighted ones, we obtain so-called narrow-blade CSMs.
By “back-substitution”, the pixels are re-estimated one-by-one in SENSE
equations: when estimating one pixel, all other pixels are treated known and
replaced by the corresponding pixels in the regenerated blade images. Motion
parameters and blade-combined images are updated.
(3) Joint-blade SENSE is performed. It
produces the final images. High frequency data is regenerated to widen the
acquired blades to full resolution. Joint-blade SENSE equation is formed
pixel-wise: for each slice to solve, the images of widened blades are rotated
and shifted according to motion parameters and CAIPI shift patterns, such that
this slice is spatially fixed in all blades; for each pixel on this slice, the
single-blade SENSE equations are combined to form the joint-blade SENSE
equation. Back-substitution is also used.
Simulations: SMS PROPELLER data (16 blades×30 lines or 32 blades×15 lines) were
synthesized from phantom images and brain images, at MB4/6/8. The images were
acquired at 3T using eight-channel coil with matrix size 256×256. Inter-blade
in-plane rigid motion was added with uniform random distribution (±5 degree
rotation and ±5 pixels translation). Random Gaussian noise was added with
SNR=10/30. G-factor maps were generated by pseudo multiple replica [5].
Results
(1) In phantom simulation (Figure 2), MJB
SENSE resulted in much less noise than SSB SENSE. The nRMS error and mean
g-factor confirmed the noise reduction using MJB SENSE was 30%-50% (Figure 3).
The mean g-factors using SSB/MJB SENSE were 1.27/0.83, 3.66/1.85, and 7.46/3.81
at MB4, MB6, and MB8, respectively.
(2) Even without noise (Figure 4), SSB
SENSE resulted in ringing artifact and slice leakage, which became more serious
with narrower blades; MJB SENSE largely reduced these artifacts.
(3) In moving brain simulation (Figure 5),
the noise reduction effect of MJB SENSE was similar to that in the phantom
simulation. Both methods achieved good motion correction.
Discussion and Conclusion
(1) MJB
SENSE substantially reduces noise amplification, because it treats the data as
a whole rather than separately. Specifically, we establish joint-blade SENSE
equations such that the blades are linked and regularized mutually; we also utilize
blade-combined images, which is essentially utilizing all blades. In fact,
similar concept has also been employed in other reconstruction methods to
improve SNR [6,7]. With the capability of
reducing noise, MJB SENSE may enable very high MB factors for future SMS
PROPELLER applications.
(2) MJB
SENSE largely reduces the narrow-blade artifact. Normal Cartesian SENSE assumes
point-spread-function being Dirac [8],
which is not satisfied with narrow blades. To address this, customized CSMs are
used for the blades in step 2, and the blades are widened in step 3. In this
way, Cartesian SENSE are adapted to narrow blades.
(3) Both
SSB and MJB SENSE are compatible with motion correction. To address more
complicated motion, more strategies such as weighting and relaxation, may need
to be further developed for MJB SENSE. Note that MJB SENSE can enable higher MB
factors, which may promise SMS PROPELLER for true 3D motion correction in the
future.
(4) MJB
SENSE is efficient, not relying on iterations. Yet it is feasible to combine
MJB SENSE with iterations to further improve the reconstructed image quality (shown
in another abstract submitted). MJB method may be further applied to GRAPPA-based
or non-Cartesian-based methods to enhance SNR and address motion-induced
calibration error.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Norbeck, O., et. al., ISMRM, 2015. No.0245.
[2] Lyu, M., et. al., ISMRM, 2015. No.2411.
[3] Chang, Y., et al., Magn Reson Med, 2014.
[4] Pipe, J.G., et al., Magn Reson Med, 2014.
[5] Robson, P.M., et al., Magn Reson Med, 2008.
[6] Chen, N.K., et al., Neuroimage, 2013.
[7] Mistretta, C.A., et al., Magn Reson Med, 2006.
[8] Pruessmann, K.P., et al., Magn Reson Med, 1999.