Arjan D. Hendriks1, Cezar B.S. Alborahal2, Michel G.M. Italiaander2, Dennis W.J. Klomp1,2, and Natalia Petridou1
1Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 2MR Coils B.V., Drunen, Netherlands
Synopsis
There
is an overall drive to high speed, high resolution brain MRI. High density
receive arrays have proven to be a very valuable tool in this process. However,
alternative acquisition strategies like 2DCAIPIRINHA have shown to be highly
effective in acceleration. We investigated whether a 256ch high density receive
array with or without 2DCAIPIRINHA can still outperform a 32ch array with 2DCAIPIRINHA.Introduction
The brain is organized at multiple spatial scales,
ranging from small neuronal populations to brain-wide networks. To understand
how the brain operates we need to measure dynamic processes across these
spatial scales, concurrently.
Present-day efforts are geared towards accelerated
imaging techniques (SENSE [1], CAIPIRINHA [2], SMS [3]). These techniques have
significantly advanced our capability to image whole brain function at a
resolution in the order of millimeters in a few seconds (for example 1.25 mm isotropic
in 2 sec at 7T for human connectome project [4]). At high fields, the increased
SNR and sensitivity offers the advantage of increased resolution. However, very
high resolution scans still have a penalty of increased scan time for whole
brain imaging (for example 0.55 mm isotropic in 6 sec [5]) or restrictions to
small areas in the brain.
The performance of accelerated imaging methods depends
on the coil used. High density receiver arrays allow for higher acceleration
factors with reduced g-factors and very high resolutions [5]. It may be
questioned whether alternative acceleration techniques can improve acceleration
even further. Which is why, in this work, we investigate 2DCAIPIRINHA [6] performance
in an extension of the high density array, that is a 256 channel coil (Figure 1) for whole brain imaging.
Aim
In
this study, while in the process of installing the receivers, simulations are
performed to investigate the possible acceleration performance of a virtual 256
channel coil in combination with an advanced parallel imaging sequence, i.e. 2DCAIPIRINHA
for 3D datasets.
Methods
All measurements were performed on a healthy volunteer in
a 7 Tesla Achieva system (Philips, Cleveland, USA). To simulate the performance
of a 256ch whole brain receive array, two 16ch receive arrays (MR Coils BV,
Drunen, the Netherlands) were shifted 8 times to different positions on the
head (Figure
2).
For each position a reference scan was acquired, yielding a total of 8
reference scans, each containing signal from 32 channels. For comparison
purposes, a reference scan was also acquired with the standard 32 channel headcoil
(Nova Medical, USA). The SENSE reference scans were acquired as follows: 3D gradient
echo, acquired interleaved with receiver arrays and volume coil; TE/TR=
1.22/8.0 ms, 2x2x2 mm3 voxel, 20x20x20 cm3 FOV,
acquisition time= 1min. After scanning, sensitivity maps were constructed from
the reference scans. The resulting 8 sets of 32 channels were combined to form
a virtual 256ch coil. The sensitivity maps were calculated using ReconFrame (Gyrotools,
Zurich, Switzerland). To correct for head displacement in between reference
scans, images acquired for each coil position were aligned to the images of the
first position using AFNI. Alignment parameters (rotation & translation)
were calculated, using the reconstructed magnitude images from the reference scan.
Afterwards these parameters were applied to the sensitivity matrices per coil
position.
The g-factor (geometry factor, noise
amplification factor) was calculated from the sensitivity maps according to
Pruessman et al. [1]. Multiple g-factor calculations were performed for
different combinations of SENSE acceleration factors and different 2DCAIPIRINHA
undersampling patterns (Figure 3).
Results
The calculated g-factor maps (Figure 4)
are shown for different acceleration factors, for both the standard 32ch head
coil (Figure
4,
top) and the virtual 256ch coil (Figure
4,
bottom). The undersampling patterns shown are 2DSENSE (left) and 2DCAIPIRINHA (right).
Different acceleration factors are displayed in feet-head
(FH) and anterior-posterior (AP) direction. When considering a g-factor of less
than 2 (to avoid excessive noise amplification), the maximum achievable
acceleration for the standard 32ch headcoil is: 9 (SENSE 3x3) and 12
(CAIPIRINHA 4x3
_FH2). For the virtual 256ch headcoil this is: 24 (SENSE 4x6)
and 28 (CAIPIRINHA 4x7
_AP3).
Discussion and conclusion
The results show that a virtual 256ch head coil allows for
more than 2-fold acceleration performance compared to the standard 32ch head coil.
In addition, for both the standard head coil and the virtual 256ch coil, a 2DCAIPIRINHA
sampling pattern results in significant improvements for a high SNR or
acceleration performance. Overall, a spectacular maximum acceleration factor of
28 is estimated.
Note that the reference scan of the virtual 256ch coil is
acquired consecutively, excluding incorporation of the full noise correlation
matrix in the simulation. However, coil coupling is expected to be highest
between neighboring coils, which is taken into account in this simulation by partially
filling the noise correlation matrix (diagonally) with the noise coupling
measured from the 32ch sets.
In conclusion, the virtual 256ch head coil shows great
acceleration performance. Together with 2DCAIPIRINHA, a peak acceleration factor
of 28 can be achieved, showing great potential for high density receive arrays combined
with fast parallel imaging acquisition methods.
Acknowledgements
The
Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), grant number:
ALW-834.14.004References
[1] K.P. Pruessmann et al. 1999 Magn Reson Med 42:952–962
[2] F.A.
Breuer et al. 2005 Magn Reson Med 53:684–691
[3] M. Barth et al. 2015 Magn Reson Med [Epub ahead of
print] 26-08-2015
[4] K. Ugurbil
et al. 2013 NeuroImage 80: 80–104
[5] N. Petridou
et al. 2013 NMR Biomed 26: 65–73
[6] F.A.
Breuer et al. 2006 Magn Reson Med 55:549–556