Jisu Hu1,2, Zhigang Wu3, Wenxing Fang3, Ming Li4, Bing Zhang4, and Feng Huang3
1Suzhou Institute of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Suzhou, China, People's Republic of, 2The Laboratory for Medical Electronics, School of Biological Sciences and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China, People's Republic of, 3Philips Healthcare, Suzhou, China, People's Republic of, 4Department of Radiology, the Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
A new reconstruction method is presented for high-resolution DWI in zoomed FOV imaging with parallel acquisitions. this method can reduce noise and artifact in the reconstructed images compared to conventional SENSE magnitude average.Purpose:
Single-shot echo planar imaging (ssh-EPI), which is widely used in
diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), has the advantages of
short acquisition time and less sensitivity to motion. However, it suffers from
geometric distortion, image blurring and signal loss due to local B0 field
inhomogeneity, for which imaging resolution is highly restricted,
even when parallel imaging is applied, such as sensitivity encoding (SENSE)
[1].
Zoomed field-of-view (FOV) imaging provides a feasible way to increase in-plane
resolution by reducing the FOV along the phase-encoding (PE) direction, which
has been approved in previous studies
[2, 3, 4]. To further increase
resolution and reduce distortion, it is intuitive to apply parallel imaging to
zoomed FOV DWI but at the cost of more SNR reduction and reconstruction
artifact. SENSE usually cannot provide satisfactory results in this
situation due to the ill-conditioned inverse of SENSE encoding matrix. Hence, the
goal of this work is to provide a new reconstruction method for zoomed FOV DWI
with parallel acquisitions.
Methods:
Theory: SENSE
reconstruction is formulated as I = S*p, where I is the vector of pixels in
each aliased coil image at the same location, S is the matrix of coil
sensitivity values, and p is the vector of pixels to be reconstructed. In
zoomed FOV imaging, the locations of fold-over pixels get closer and the sensitivity
values in these locations become similar, resulting in more amplified noise and
artifact in the reconstruction than in the full FOV case due to more ill-conditioned
inverse of S. To enhance SNR, more number of signal averages (NSA) are
performed traditionally, but they are not fully used in zoomed FOV imaging via
just an average. In practice, the image phase varies across different NSAs and
the coil sensitivities can be modulated by different phases. In the proposed
reconstruction, Joint SENSE across NSA, instead of average after individual
SENSE, is performed and the image phase P is extracted after some proper
de-noising (total-variation de-noising, for example). Then the new
reconstruction can be reformulated as I’ = S’*p, where I’ = [I1; I2;
…; INSA], S’ = [S1.*P1; S2.*P2;
…; SNSA.*PNSA]. In this way, the condition of the inverse
of S’ is greatly improved compared to S.
Data
acquisition: The DWI experiment was performed on a Philips 1.5T
MRI scanner (Philips Healthcare, Suzhou, China) with an 8-channel head coil.
All the scans in this experiment involved 3 diffusion encoding directions with
b = 1000 s/mm2 and the PE direction was set to left-right. The
ssh-EPI full FOV DWI was first performed using the following parameters: SENSE
acceleration factor = 2, FOV = 230*230 mm2, default in-plane
resolution = 2.3*2.3 mm2, slice thickness = 5mm, TR = 2500ms, TE =
minimum and NSA = 2. Then, iZOOM[4] DWI was scanned twice with SENSE
acceleration factor set to 1 and 2 respectively, and the other parameters were
kept the same in these two scans: in-plane resolution = 1.5*1.5 mm2,
FOV = 230*60 mm2, slice thickness = 5mm, TR = 2500ms, TE = minimum
and NSA = 12.
Data
processing: Since different SENSE acceleration factors generate
different distortion patterns in the images, we artificially under-sampled the
fully sampled iZOOM imaging data by a factor of 2. Images were reconstructed
using conventional SENSE and the proposed method, and the
root-mean-square-errors (RMSE) were calculated for quantitative comparison. For
visual comparison, conventional SENSE was performed on all the imaging data in
this experiment and the proposed method was conducted on the iZOOM imaging data
with SENSE acceleration factor of 2.
Results:
Fig. 1 shows the reconstruction results of the simulated imaging data.
The conventional SENSE magnitude average introduces strong noise and artifact
in the image, whereas higher reconstruction fidelity is achieved using the
proposed method. Fig. 2 lists the RMSEs of SENSE magnitude average and the
proposed reconstruction in all the 3 diffusion directions, where the reference
image is obtained using CLEAR (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) with
the fully acquired iZOOM imaging data. The RMSE of the proposed method is
greatly reduced compared to that of conventional SENSE average. In visual
comparison, although in-plane resolution is set to 2.3mm and parallel acquisition
is applied, distortion in the anterior fossa (white arrow) is still severe in
the full FOV DWI (Fig. 3A). iZOOM DWI with fully sampled data (Fig.3B) is able to
provide higher image resolution, but the distortion is still obvious. Fig. 3C
and Fig. 3D show the two reconstructions of iZOOM DWI with parallel acquisitions.
We can see that the SENSE magnitude average result is covered by strong noise
and artifact, while the anatomical structure in the anterior fossa is better
revealed in the proposed reconstruction.
Discussion:
In this work, we present a new reconstruction method for high-resolution
zoomed FOV DWI with parallel acquisitions. The sensitivity values can be
modulated by phases from different NSAs so that data from all NSAs can be used
to jointly calculate the pixels to be reconstructed. The improved condition of
the inverse of S’ makes the reconstruction results with less amplified noise
and artifact compared to SENSE. Both quantitative and qualitative results show that the proposed method
can provide better reconstruction than conventional SENSE magnitude average.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Pruessmann K.P., et. al. MRM 1999; 42:952-962. [2] Saritas E., et.
al. MRM 2008; 60:468–473. [3] Finsterbusch J., JMRI 2012, 35:984-992. [4] Wu
Z., et. al. Proceedings of ISMRM 2015; 4161.