Synopsis
In this work, we developed and evaluated a method for reducing motion sensitivity of auto-calibration data for parallel imaging in 3D MRI, with application to high-resolution diffusion imaging at ultra-high field. With the proposed Slice-FLEET method, we successfully achieve high resolution (1mm isotropic) diffusion MRI with high SNR and high b values.Purpose
To
develop and evaluate a method for reducing motion sensitivity of
auto-calibration data for parallel imaging in 3D MRI, with application to
high-resolution diffusion imaging at ultra-high field.
Introduction
3D
multi-slab acquisition can achieve high isotropic-resolution DWI with
optimal SNR efficiency
1,2. Using single-shot EPI for each k
z partition, 3D multi-slab DWI can be as fast as conventional 2D multi-slice DWI. In this case, in-plane parallel undersampling is necessary
to reduce TE and T
2* blurring, especially at ultra-high-field. GRAPPA auto-calibration
data for EPI are typically acquired in a segmented manner for a matched echo spacing with the imaging scans, and it has been shown that GRAPPA reconstruction
in 2D EPI is significantly improved by the recently proposed FLEET method
3: all segments of a given slice are acquired in immediate succession to minimise motion and respiration induced phase corruptions between segments. It has also been
shown that FLEET-like ACS acquisition improves reconstruction in single-slab 3D
EPI
4. We therefore expect that FLEET-ACS will also benefit GRAPPA
reconstruction for 3D multi-slab EPI. In this work, we
implemented several possible versions of FLEET for 3D multi-slab EPI DWI, to
determine how to best acquire FLEET-ACS data. In vivo
results show that “slice-by-slice FLEET” provides the best reconstruction
compared with other methods, enabling high-SNR DWI at 1mm isotropic resolution
with a high b value of 2000s/mm
2.
Design and Implementation
Three
possible FLEET-ACS schemes for use with 3D multi-slab imaging are depicted in Fig.1, along with the expected benefits of different approaches. These can broadly
be characterised as: FLEET-like (exciting slabs aligned to the centre of
the subsequent multi-slab imaging data with fully kz phase-encodes), slab-FLEET (FLEET-like without kz phase-encodes) and slice-FLEET (using 2D
multi-slice acquisitions corresponding to all slices' locations in the imaging
volume). Long acquisition times required by the FLEET-like method might
undermine the goal of reduced motion sensitivity, and this option was not
considered further.
We implemented and compared
four methods for ACS acquisition: spin-echo single-shot (SSH) EPI, conventional
spin-echo multi-shot (MSH) EPI, Slab-FLEET and Slice-FLEET. SSH and conventional MSH based methods excite
the same slab as in imaging scan and one set of 2D ACS data was acquired for
each slab. Slab-FLEET: for each image
slab, the FLEET-ACS scan excites a slab aligned to the centre of the imaging data, but using a thinner-slab excitation to reduce signal loss due to intra-voxel
de-phasing. Slice-FLEET: for each image slab, the FLEET-ACS scan
acquires a set of ACS data for each slice. With thin-slice excitation, the
intra-voxel de-phasing could be minimised and local coil sensitivity can be
better captured.
Experimental Methods
Three healthy subjects were scanned on a Siemens 7T scanner with 32ch RX
Nova coil. Scan parameters: FOV 210×210×117mm
3, matrix size 204×204,14 slabs,10 slices/slab, slice thickness 1.03mm, 20% slab overlap, in-plane GRAPPA
3, partial Fourier 6/8, echo-spacing 0.82ms, BW 1442 Hz/pixel, TE/TR=71/2600ms,
b=0,1000,2000 s/mm
2. For SSH, conventional MSH and Slab-FLEET, GRAPPA kernels calibrated from ACS data were applied to all k
z
partitions. For Slice-FLEET, the GRAPPA kernel for each slice was calculated
separately and a Fourier transform along k
z was applied
before GRAPPA reconstruction. We acquired Slab-FLEET ACS with different slab
thicknesses (100%,50%,20%,10%), and Slice-FLEET ACS with 1× and 2× imaging slice thicknesses (relative
to the final reconstructed 3D volume).
Results
Fig.2 compares GRAPPA reconstructions using different ACS-acquisition methods. SSH
reconstructions show residual aliasing and strong noise amplification
because the distortions are not matched. While the distortions are matched in
the conventional MSH method, the phase error between in-plane segments can be
large, leading to aliased reconstructions. Slab-FLEET improves on this,
although the choice of slab-thickness is a problem: if it is thin (10%-20%) the
performance at the boundary slices degrades, as the kernel does not capture the
local coil sensitivities well enough. If a thick slab is used
(50%-100%), stronger noise amplification can be seen, particularly in the DWI images (red ellipses). Slice-Fleet works well
in all scenarios, with a slightly better performance for the 2x slice thickness
version (boundary slice of the b=0 image). Fig.3 shows a DWI image
at the slab centre (b=2000 s/mm
2), also demonstrating the
SNR improvement in Slice-FLEET over Slab-FLEET.
Discussion and conclusion
The
SNR efficiency of 3D multi-slab DWI makes this method attractive,
but data quality is easily compromised by poor-quality ACS data. We have
adapted the FLEET-ACS approach for accelerated 3D multi-slab reconstruction, and
demonstrate less residual artefacts and increased SNR compared to the typical
ACS schemes. We find that slice-by-slice FLEET-ACS provides
the highest SNR and lowest residual artefacts, as was here illustrated in
application to high-resolution high-b-value 3D multi-slab diffusion imaging at
7T.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Initial Training Network, HiMR, funded by the FP7 Marie Curie Actions of the European Commission (FP7-PEOPLE-2012-ITN-316716), and the Wellcome Trust.References
[1] Engstrom M, Skare S.
Diffusion-weighted 3D multislab echo planar
imaging for high signal-to-noise ratio
efficiency and isotropic image
resolution. Magn Reson Med 2013;70:1507–1514.
[2] Frost R, Miller KL, Tijssen RH,
Porter DA, Jezzard P. 3D multi-slab
diffusion-weighted readout-segmented EPI
with real-time cardiacreordered
K-space acquisition. Magn Reson Med
2014;72:1565–1579.
[3] Polimeni, J. R., Bhat, H.,
Witzel, T., Benner, T., Feiweier, T., Inati, S. J., Renvall, V., Heberlein, K.
and Wald, L. L. (2015), Reducing sensitivity losses due to respiration and
motion in accelerated echo planar imaging by reordering the autocalibration
data acquisition. Magn Reson Med. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25628
[4] Ivanov D, Barth M, Uludag K, Poser BA. Robust
ACS acquisition for 3D echo planar imaging. In: Proceedings of the 23th Scientific Meeting, International
Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Toronto, p 2059; 2015