Haris Saybasili1 and Ning Jin2
1MR R&D, Siemens Healthcare USA, Inc., Chicago, IL, United States, 2MR R&D, Siemens Healthcare USA, Inc., Columbus, OH, United States
Synopsis
Flow quantification on uncooperative patients
that cannot hold their breath may be performed by real-time free-breathing flow
acquisitions that generally cover multiple heart-beats. However, heart-rate
fluctuations, low SNR, and respiratory motion associated with such acquisitions
may impede flow quantification process. In this study, we are extending our
unsupervised motion correction method for real-time free-breathing cine imaging
to flow imaging, and comparing the results with gold standard ECG gated, breath-held,
segmented flow acquisition. Preliminary results indicate net forward volumes in
agreement with the reference, with comparable image quality.TARGET AUDIENCE
Cardiovascular MRI, Radiologists, Cardiologists
PURPOSE
ECG gated, breath-held segmented acquisitions are
reference standard for cardiac flow quantification with good spatial/temporal
resolutions. However, such techniques do not perform well with uncooperative
patients that cannot hold their breath, or patients with arrhythmia[NJ1] . Real-time free-breathing
acquisitions are viable alternatives, but with the expense of lower SNR and
decreased spatial/temporal resolution. Additionally, real-time acquisitions
usually covers multiple heartbeats, which makes it difficult to quantify stroke
volume or regurgitation fraction. We previously proposed an unsupervised motion
correction technique that reconstructed single heart-beat, pseudo-breathheld
cardiac cine images from real-time free-breathing acquisitions that covered
multiple heart-beats without human interaction (1). In this work, we extend
this work and apply it in free-breathing real-time flow acquisitions (2) to
generate pseudo-breathhold magnitude and phase flow images in a single
heartbeat. The proposed approach was evaluated in healthy volunteers to measure
flow in the ascending aorta (AO) and main pulmanory artery (MPA) Net forward
flow volume measured from real-time acquisition with motion correction reconstruction
was compared to the reference ECG-gated segmented acquisition during
breathhold.
[NJ1]How
do you think this technique would work with patients with arrhythmia? I am just
saying segmented is not good for arrhythmias J
Real-time works fine, and moco will work as well. Next
step for me is to integrate arrhythmia handling.
METHODS
Segmented gradient echo (GRE) and free-breathing
real-time echo-planar-imaging (EPI) flow images were acquired in four healthy
volunteers (with IRB approval) using a clinical 1.5T MR scanner (MAGNETOM Aera,
Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Images were acquired in AO and MPA. Segmented
flow images were acquired with 4 lines/segment, 192x120
imaging matrix, BW = 449 Hz/pixel, resulting a temporal resolution of 37 ms and
a total acquisition time of 18 heartbeats TGRAPPA factor 3 with shared velocity encoding (2) was used during real-time
data acquisitions with EPI factor = 7, 128 * 84 imaging matrix, BW = 2000
Hz/pixel, resulting in a temporal resolution of 32 ms. The real-time images
were acquired covering 16 to 20 beats per slice, and the data were processed in
an unsupervised fashion using our method as described in (1). Both conventional
segmented and motion corrected real-time single heartbeat flow images were
analyzed to evaluate net forward volume (syngo
Argus, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany).
RESULTS
AO and MPA images reconstructed from reference
standard, and real-time free-breathing data sets with and without motion
correction are presented in Figure 1. Motion corrected
images were superior to the original real-time images in terms of SNR. Although
low in spatial resolution compared to the reference standard, quality of the
motion corrected real-time images was comparable to segmented breath-hold images.
The net forward flow volume from the segmented BH and real-time moco approaches
was also compared using pair-wise t-tests. There was no significant difference
between the values measured by two approaches (p = 0.979). Results are depicted
in Fig. 2. A basic background phase correction was applied to motion-corrected
images by selecting a reference region-of-interest in the nearby static tissue.
Please note that our post-processing tool was applied to reconstructed DICOM
images. Therefore, possible aliasing due to inadequate velocity setting might
negatively affect the results. This work will be extended to work on original
complex images to improve the overall robustness of the aforementioned
automated post-processing technique.
CONCLUSION
We demonstrate the feasibility to apply our unsupervised
motion correction technique to real-time free-breathing flow acquisitions. This
technique generates pseudo breath-held images in a single-heart beat with
high-SNR and makes the workflow for flow quantification quite easy. Compared to
the referenced standard, the image quality was comparable and net flow volume
was in good agreement.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
(1) Saybasili, et al. ISMRM 2015, #1230.
(2) Lin, et al. Magn Reson Med 2012 Sep; 68(3):703-10.