Chao Zou1, Wensha Guo1, Xin Liu1, Hairong Zheng1, and Yiu-Cho Chung1
1Paul C. Lauterbur Research Center for Biomedical Imaging, Shenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, CAS, Shenzhen, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
A
novel SSFP sequence with interleaved acquisition for F0, F- and F+ was proposed
and applied to T1/T2 relaxometry. The good agreement with analytical solution
of SSFP implies that steady state is maintained at different TR. Compared to
TESS, TEs of the three echoes can be identical to eliminate T2* effect. The reduced
TR decreases susceptibility induced signal void and motion sensitivity. The
crusher in slice select direction avoids the unwanted diffusion effect for high
resolution imaging. The phantom study shows that the T1/T2 relaxometry results
are consistent with the traditional IR-TSE and SE results.Introduction
Steady state free precession (SSFP) signal has
multiple signal components. The FID (F0) and the spin echo (F-) components can
be used to measure T2 1. It was also demonstrated
that the various components could be acquired within the same TR 2. Triple Echo Steady-State (TESS) used this technique to acquire
the F0, F- and the echo shifted (F+) components within one TR for T1 and T2
relaxometry 3.
Acquiring multiple echoes in one TR is
unfavorable to signal components that decay over more than one TR cycle before acquisition
(such as F- and F+). We propose here a novel SSFP sequence that acquires the
F0, F- and F+ component in an interleaved way for T1 and T2 relaxometry.
Materials and Methods
Figure 1 shows the 3D iTESS
sequence. The unbalanced SSFP sequence has a net crusher moment Q (≠ 0) over every TR. F0, F- and F+ were acquired in an
interleaved way. The gradients in the phase encoding (PE) and readout (RO) direction were balanced to reduce motion sensitivity. Unwanted
components were dephased by designing appropriate crushers
applied to any direction but the slice select (SS) direction is preferred due
to its lowest resolution 4. Let A = the SS gradient
moment, the crusher moments are (Figure 1):
F+: B=-Q–A/2, C=2*Q-A/2 [1]
F0: D=-A/2, E=Q-A/2 [2]
F-: F = Q-A/2, G = -A/2 [3]
TE was identical among the three
echoes to eliminate the T2* decay effects. The readout bandwidths were also
identical. The sequence was implemented on a 3T MRI scanner (TIM TRIO,
Erlangen, Germany).
Four tubes of MnCl2 solution
with concentration 0.125/0.25/0.375/0.5 mM were fixed in an agar
phantom. Using IR-TSE and SE, the T1 values in ms were found to be 654.9±15.7, 418.8±28.2, 295.5±9.3, 233.9±15.6, the T2 values in ms were 41.3±0.84, 28.2±0.65,
20.0±0.59, 15.6±0.35 respectively. iTESS was used to image the phantom and
acquired the three signals using different FAs. The measured signals
were compared to the analytical results. Imaging parameters used were: TR/TE =
8/4 ms, bandwidth = 723 Hz/pixel, matrix size = 256*152*64, resolution =
0.83*0.83*3 mm3; FA was varied between 5o~40o.
The signals of iTESS were validated against their corresponding analytical equations 5 using one tube
with T1/T2 = 418.8/28.2 ms.
The signals dependence on FAs were compared to the corresponding
signals measured from the sequence.
T1
and T2 relaxometry were then performed. Here, the
signals acquired at a flip angle of 10o/15o were used.
The T1 and T2 maps were found using the golden section search algorithm 3 implemented in MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, USA).
Results
Figure 2 shows the phantom images from the
F0, F- and F+ components at a flip angle of 10o. Figure 3 shows how
the analytical solutions for the three signal components compared to the
experimental results at various FAs. The analytical solutions matched
the experimental SSFP signals very well.
The T1 and T2 maps computed from the signals
acquired using iTESS are shown in Figure 4. Figure 5 summarizes how the values
compared to the reference standards. The slightly higher standard deviations of
T1 and T2 values derived from iTESS were likely due to its low SNR.
Discussion and conclusions
In this study, a novel SSFP sequence with
interleaved acquisition for F0, F- and F+ was proposed and applied to T1/T2
relaxometry. The good agreement in Figure 3 shows that signals acquired from iTESS
are described by the corresponding signal equations, implying that steady state
is maintained when crushers were placed at different TR cycles according to
Eq.[1-3].
Though iTESS takes longer time to image
than TESS, it has several advantages over TESS. First, the TEs of the three
echoes are identical. The T2* decay of the three echoes can be
canceled out. In TESS, the T2* effect cannot be ignored since the three echoes have
different TEs. Second, iTESS has a shorter TR. As the effective TE of F+ is
(nTR + TE), the short TR decreases susceptibility induced signal void. Short TR also reduces motion
sensitivity. Third, in TESS, the crushers are applied along the RO direction, which has the highest spatial
resolution. Strong crushers are needed, which would introduce unwanted diffusion
effect that needs to be taken into account in the SSFP signal model since TR is
long. Meanwhile, the crushers in iTESS can be put in the SS direction and can
be small. Together with the short
TR, the diffusion effect can be neglected.
In conclusion, a new interleaved SSFP
sequence was proposed. It can be and successfully applied to simultaneous T1/T2
relaxometry.
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by National Science Fundation of China (NSFC) grant No. 81327801 and No. 61302040, and Natural Science Research Program of Shenzhen No. JCYJ20150630114942317References
[1] S Matsui, M Kuroda, H Kohno. A new
method of measuring T2 using steady-state free precession, Journal of Magnetic
Resonance, 1969, 62(1):12-18.
[2] C Mizumoto, E Yoshitome. Multiple echo
SSFP sequences, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1991, 18(1): 244-250.
[3] R Heule, C Ganter, O Bieri. Triple echo
steady-state (TESS) relaxometry, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2014, 71(1):
230-237.
[4] O Bieri, C Ganter, K Scheffler. On the
fluid-tissue contrast behavior of high-resolution steady-state sequences, Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine, 2012, 68(5): 1586-1592.
[5] W Hanicke, H Vogel. An analytical
solution for SSFP signal in MRI, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2003, 49(4):
771-775