Mehdi Hedjazi Moghari1,2, Martin Uecker3,4, Sébastien Roujol5, Tal Geva1,2, and Andrew J Powell1,2
1Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 2Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 3German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Goettingen, Germany, 4Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany, 5Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King’s Health Partners, St. Thomas’ Hospital, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
Synopsis
To accelerate
whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography, we implemented a variable density Poisson
disc undersampling pattern and compressed sensing parallel image reconstruction,
and compared it to a standard parallel image (SENSE) acquisition in 15 patients.
The compressed sensing technique was faster (mean 3.4±1.0 minutes vs 7.6±1.7 minutes)
and had similar objectively measured sharpness in 4 designated regions (all p>0.05)
but a lower subjective image quality scores (all p≤0.05). Introduction
Electrocardiogram and respiratory navigator
(NAV)-gated 3D whole-heart magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) acquired with
an intravascular gadolinium-based contrast agent and a non-selective inversion
recovery (IR) pulse to null the myocardial signal generates a high-resolution
anatomic dataset allowing for a comprehensive evaluation of intra-cardiac,
coronary, and vascular abnormalities [1]. To improve respiratory motion
compensation with this sequence, we previously implemented the “Heart-NAV”
technique, which prospectively tracks the heart position rather than hemi-diaphragm
location. Still, an important limitation of this sequence is a relatively long acquisition
time lasting 5-15 minutes [2]. During longer acquisitions, the patients’ heart-rate,
breathing pattern, and body position may change leading to reduced image
quality or incomplete scans. Therefore, we sought to reduce the imaging time of
this sequence by implementing a variable density Poisson disc undersampling
technique that randomly samples k-space lines and using compressed sensing (CS)
reconstruction algorithm to complete the scan in ≈3 minutes.
Materials and Methods
The
schematic diagram of the whole-heart IR
3D SSFP MRA sequence with Heart-NAV is shown in Fig. 1. One of the startup
pulses for the 3D SSFP acquisition was used to collect the centerline of
k-space, and its 1-dimensional reconstruction was fed into the conventional
navigator signal analysis process to prospectively gate and track respiratory-induced
heart displacement. A variable density Poisson disc undersampling pattern was
implemented on the scanner to randomly sample k-space lines with a variable
sampling rate. The most central 2% of k-space was fully sampled. The sampling
rate was then exponentially decreased from the center to periphery of k-space to
sample 16-18% of the k-space lines in a radial order on Cartesian grids (Fig. 2).
A nonlinear iterative CS reconstruction algorithm, L1-ESPIRiT [3], with L1-wavelet
penalty and random shifting as implemented in Bart [4] was used to estimate the
unacquired k-space lines and reconstruct the images. The regularization
parameter was optimized on one dataset and kept constant for the whole study. To
assess this approach, 15 patients (7 females; age 19±9 years) underwent 2 Heart-NAV
IR 3D SSFP acquisitions on a 1.5T MR scanner (Philips Ingenia) after the
administration of 0.03 mmol/kg
gadofosveset trisodium (Ablavar) contrast. The first acquisition used parallel-imaging
(SENSE) and the second used variable density Poisson disc k-space filling with
CS reconstruction. Imaging parameters were FOV ~310(SI)×140(AP)×130(RL) mm, spatial
resolution 1.2-1.5 mm; α/TE/TR 90°/2/4 ms, bandwidth 1.06 kHz, Heart-NAV
acceptance window 3 mm, tracking factor 1, 28-element phased-array coil, and a
reduction factor of 2 for SENSE and ~6 for CS. CS image reconstruction was performed
offline (processing time 5.3±2.1
minutes). To assess the image quality, the
border sharpness of the lower pulmonary vein (LPV), right pulmonary artery
(RPA), ascending aorta (AAO), and ventricular septum (VS) was subjectively
graded by 2 clinicians based on a 5 point-scale (1-poor/non-diagnostic;
2-fair/moderate blurring; 3-acceptable/mild blurring; 4-Good/sharp image; and 5-excellent), and objectively measured (MediaCare tool, range
0-infinity with higher values being sharper) [5]. Subjective and objective
measures for the 2 acquisitions were compared using the signed-rank test and
paired student t-test, respectively, and a p-value ≤0.05 was considered
statistically significant. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Results
Fig.
3 shows representative 3D whole-heart MRA images acquired from 2 patients using
SENSE and CS. The scan time for CS was significantly shorter (3.4±1.0 vs.
7.6±1.7; p<0.05). As shown in Table 1, there was no significant difference
in the objectively measured border sharpness at all 4 locations between SENSE and
CS (all p>0.05). The subjective image quality score for CS was lower than
that for SENSE at all 4 locations (all p≤0.05, mean 3.46±0.64 vs. 4.33±0.83). The
minimum image quality score for all locations using CS was 3.
Conclusions
Compared
to a SENSE rate of 2, our variable density Poisson disc undersampling with CS
reconstruction method for the whole-heart IR 3D SSFP MRA reduced scan time by a
factor of 2.2. Objectively measured border sharpness was not significantly
different but subjective image quality was reduced by approximately 1 grade. The
latter finding may be related to more extensive undersampling of the k-space (18-20%
vs. 50%) and the resulting reduction in signal-to-noise ratio. Future work will assess this CS approach in a larger group of children
and adults, and extend it to a 3D cine acquisition.
Acknowledgements
Authors acknowledge support from Translational
Research Program (TRP) fellowship and office of faculty development from Boston
Children’s Hospital and Harvard Catalyst from Harvard Medical School.References
[1] Makowski, Radiology, 2011; [2] Fenchel, Pediatric Radiology, 2006; [3] Uecker, MRM, 2014; [4] Uecker, ISMRM 2015, [5] Roujol, JCMR, 2014.