Alexander D. Cohen1, Andrew S. Nencka1,2, and Yang Wang1,2
1Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States, 2Biophysics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
Synopsis
A multiband (MB) echo planar imaging (EPI) sequence with multishot
autocalibration was developed and implemented at 7T. Slices were unaliased
using the principles of Hadamard encoding, resulting in a fully-sampled
calibration scan reconstructed without parallel imaging techniques. A Hadamard
unaliasing procedure was demonstrated with an acceleration factor of lower rank
than the Hadamard encoding matrix. Using this sequence, a functional MRI
protocol at 7T was introduced to obtain a sufficient calibration volume, that was
then utilized to unalias the remaining repetitions using a slice-GRAPPA
technique. Preliminary resting state data acquired using this protocol has
generated reliable connectivity networks.Purpose
Multiband (MB) imaging, which involves the simultaneous
excitation of multiple slices, has been developed to speed up 2D EPI
acquisitions
1,2. In order to solve the slice-unaliasing problem of
MB imaging, a fully sampled calibration dataset is needed. Typically, a
separate reference scan with a MB-factor=1 (MB1) is collected. However, collecting
the reference scan in this way can lead to an increased risk of motion between
the reference scan and data acquisition, and long TRs resulting in longer acquisitions
with varied T1 weighting. At 7T, increased
susceptibility effects necessitate the addition of in-plane acceleration to
reduce distortion and T2* related signal loss. To address these issues, a multiband scan with multishot (MS) autocalibration was developed
and prepended to a MB-EPI acquisition. Furthermore, an application of Hadamard
unaliasing with an acceleration factor lower than the rank of the Hadamard
encoding matrix was implemented to unalias the slices
3, yielding a fully sampled
calibration scan unreliant upon parallel imaging techniques.
Methods
Autocalibration
repetitions were Hadamard encoded through the addition of a temporally modulated slice-wise phase tag incorporated into
the excitation pulse. Phase tags are selected so that a linear
combination of the different aliased repetitions results in the signal being
cancelled in all slices but one3. Initial testing was performed on a
phantom on a 7T GE Healthcare Discovery MR950 system using a 32-channel Nova receive-only
head coil and quadrature transmit coil. Further evaluation was conducted on three
healthy volunteers under informed consent. Each subject underwent a resting
state sagittal MB gradient-echo EPI scan.
All data was collected with the following parameters: matrix=128x128,
resolution=1.6mm isotropic, TR/TE=1000/23ms, FA=45°, MB5, in-plane R=2, excitations per repetition=17. This resulted in 85
total slices (17x5) and full brain coverage. Controlled aliasing was performed
using the Blipped-CAIPI approach with a FOV shift of 34.
At the
beginning of the MB acquisition, 32 interleaved autocalibration volumes were
acquired using a Hadamard-encoded multi-slice excitation3. To Hadamard unalias five slices,
eight repetitions are needed to form a standard Hadamard encoding matrix in
which there are effectively three encoded null images. The k-space volumes from
the odd and even interleaves were combined prior to Fourier reconstruction and
Hadamard unaliasing resulting in a fully sampled, unaliased calibration volume.
The time series data following the calibration repetitions was reconstructed
using the autocalibration scan as the reference and a slice-GRAPPA algorithm4.
Navigator echoes were obtained at the
beginning of each shot and used to correct for ghosting on a slice-by-slice and
repetition-by-repetition basis. This algorithm is shown in Figure 1.
The task-free fMRI data was analyzed using independent component
analysis (ICA) and FSL’s (www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl) MELODIC5
software
with 25 components. Data was motion corrected using MCFLIRT, blurred
using a Gaussian kernel with FWHM=3.0mm, and high-pass filtered. For each scan,
the component representing the default mode network was manually extracted. For
each timeseries, the tSNR was also computed.
Results
The Hadamard unaliased, multishot autocalibration volumes were
suitable for use as reference scan for the slice and in-plane unaliasing of the
subsequent MB-EPI volumes. Autocalibration images from a volunteer are shown in
Figure 2 alongside reconstructed MB-EPI volumes and tSNR maps. The mean tSNR in
the whole brain across subjects was 19.0+/-2.8, however tSNR in gray matter,
where brain activation is detected, was consistently greater than 30 (Figure 2C).
Reliable functional connectivity of the default mode network was found for all subjects
using ICA (Figure 3).
Discussion
One advantage of Hadamard unaliasing is the effective averaging
inherent in the unaliasing process. The unaliasing of five Hadamard encoded slices
is essentially equivalent to eight averages since eight repetitions are used to
unalias the five slices
3. Thus, a sufficient calibration volume
could be obtained in 16s (8 Hadamard repetitions x 2 interleaves x TR=1s). This usage of eight repetitions to Hadamard
unalias five slices and three null slices is novel. This allows the utility of
Hadamard unaliasing while retaining a MB acceleration factor which is within hardware
RF amplitude limits and coil sensitivity limits for subsequent GRAPPA based
unaliasing.
Conclusion
A Hadamard-encoded multiband, multishot autocalibration scan can
be used to reliably unalias MB-EPI data. This reference scan was prepended to
the EPI acquisition, reducing the chance of motion between the reference scan
and EPI acquisition. This work further shows an application of Hadamard
unaliasing with an acceleration factor lower than the rank of the Hadamard
encoding matrix through the inclusion of the mathematical construct of null
slices. Finally, the averaging inherent in the Hadamard unaliasing process, and
the fact that k-space is fully sampled, yields high SNR calibration volumes in
a short amount of time.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.
Moeller et al., Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine. 63:1144-1153 (2009).
2.
Feinberg and Setsompop,
Journal of Magnetic Resonance. 229:90-100 (2013).
3.
Souza et al., Journal of
Computer Assisted Tomography. 12(6):1026-1030 (1988).
4.
Setsompop et al.,
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 67:1210-1224 (2012).
5.
Beckmann et al., IEEE
Trans Med Imaging. 23(2):137-152 (2004).