Diffusion Tractography of the Entire Heart using Free-Breathing Accelerated Simultaneous Multislice Imaging
Choukri Mekkaoui1, Timothy G Reese1, Marcel P Jackowski2, Stephen F Cauley1, Kawin Setsompop1, William J Kostis3, Himanshu Bhat4, and David E Sosnovik1

1Harvard Medical School - Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States, 2University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil, 3Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States, 4Siemens Healthcare, Boston, MA, United States

Synopsis

We introduce an approach to perform free-breathing DTI and tractography of the whole heart based on simultaneous multislice excitation, sequential reordering of the diffusion-encoding gradients, combined with a retrospective entropy-based image alignment and selection method. The approach was tested in 7 healthy volunteers, in whom breath-hold and free-breathing scans were performed. Coherent tracts of the entire heart could be derived in all cases, and no significant differences were seen in mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, or myofiber helix angle. Accelerated free-breathing DTI of the entire heart could be performed in less than 15 minutes without significant loss of image quality.

Purpose

Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI) of the heart in vivo has previously been performed using multiple breath-holds or respiratory navigation, providing a subset of short-axis slices of the left ventricle (LV), comprising ~25% of the LV in about 20 minutes (1,2). Here we demonstrate a clinically feasible whole heart free-breathing DTI approach, with scan time under 15 minutes, based on a simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) acquisition technique combined with a retrospective image alignment and selection method. This approach avoids navigator echoes and synchronized breathing and enables anatomic coverage of the entire LV.

Methods

DTI was performed in healthy volunteers (n=7) on a clinical 3T scanner (Skyra, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) equipped with a 45 mT/m gradient system and a 34-element cardiac receive coil. Imaging was performed with an ECG-gated diffusion-encoded STE sequence, volume selected in the phase-encode axis using a slab selective radiofrequency (RF) pulse. Acquisition parameters were: FOV = 360 x 200 mm2, resolution 2.5 x 2.5 mm2, slice thickness = 8 mm, in-plane GRAPPA rate 2, TE = 34 ms, b-values = 0 and 500 s/mm2, 10 diffusion-encoding directions, and 8 magnitude averages (repetitions). Twelve short-axis and six 4-chamber slices were acquired in the systolic sweet spot of the cardiac cycle to mitigate strain effects (3). SMS excitation was followed by a blipped-CAIPI (Controlled Aliasing in Parallel Imaging) readout (4). Free-breathing scans were performed with rate 2 SMS and compared with breath-hold scans acquired with rate 3 SMS.

Breath-hold DTI was performed with the default interleaved gradient ordering scheme. For free-breathing DTI a sequential gradient ordering scheme was implemented, which ensured that enough uncorrupted samples of each diffusion-encoding direction could be selected to determine the diffusion tensor accurately. Spatiotemporal registration (STR) was performed by matching radial intensity profiles over all repetitions, and reduced the misregistration resulting from respiratory motion. With free breathing, following STR, an entropy-based retrospective image selection (ERIS) was applied to accept or reject both the diffusion-free and diffusion-weighted images. An entropy measure (EM), based on Shannon’s definition of entropy, was calculated from the distribution of signal intensity within the myocardium, across repetitions (5). Images with EM within a prescribed range ER were accepted, while those adversely affected by artifact were rejected.

For each voxel, we computed a dyadic tensor comprising the primary, secondary, and tertiary eigenvectors and their associated eigenvalues. Mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA) and myofiber helix angle (HA) were calculated, as previously described (6). Tractography was performed by numerically integrating the primary eigenvector field into streamlines using an adaptive 5th order Runge-Kutta approach (6). Comparisons between the breath-hold and free-breathing data were performed using paired t-tests.

Results

Combining STR and ERIS yielded the best quality of MD, FA, and HA maps during free breathing (Fig 1). For a mid-ventricular slice, the entropy measure EM varied between 6.39 and 7.17, rejecting images with EM less than 6.54, corresponding to the bottom 20% of EM values. DTI and tractography of the entire heart in both the short-axis and 4-chamber views could be successfully performed with the blipped-CAIPI SMS approach during both breath-hold and free-breathing (Fig 2). Each approach produced similar tractograms. Using STR and ERIS, no significant differences were found in MD (0.9 ± 0.09, 0.89 ± 0.08 ×10-3 mm2/s), FA (0.42 ± 0.06, 0.42 ± 0.05) or HA profiles between the free-breathing and breath-hold scans (Fig 3).

Discussion

Clinical translation of cardiac diffusion imaging has proven technically challenging. Previous studies have required multiple breath-holds or synchronized breathing (3,7), with partial anatomic coverage of the LV and comparatively long scan times (1,2), even with accelerated techniques such as SMS (8). In this study, we establish a free-breathing DTI approach with complete coverage of the human heart in less than 15 minutes. Respiratory motion during diffusion encoding can cause cancellation of signal in the myocardium. Lengthy breath-hold acquisitions will be burdensome for many patients. Free-breathing acquisition overcomes this hurdle using respiratory-gating with navigator echoes, or by retrospectively eliminating respiration-affected images. In this work, we used STR and ERIS to align and select the usable scans.

Conclusion

This is the first demonstration of whole heart DTI producing 3D tractograms of the entire LV using free breathing, of either the short-axis or 4-chamber views, in under 15 minutes. This clinically feasible protocol could facilitate the translation of whole heart DTI to patients with heart failure and other disease states. The characterization of myocardial microstructure using DTI in the clinical setting could provide important insights into disease pathogenesis and treatment.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the following grants from the National Institutes of Health: R56HL125590 (C.M.), R01HL093038 (D.E.S.), R01HL112831 (D.E.S.), P41RR14075 (Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging).

References

1. Nielles-Vallespin S, Mekkaoui C, Gatehouse P, et al. In vivo diffusion tensor MRI of the human heart: reproducibility of breath-hold and navigator-based approaches. Magn Reson Med. 2013;70(2):454-65.

2. Wu MT, Su MY, Huang YL, et al. Sequential Changes of Myocardial Microstructure in Patients Postmyocardial Infarction by Diffusion-Tensor Cardiac MR: Correlation With Left Ventricular Structure and Function. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2:32-40.

3. Tseng WY, Reese TG, Weisskoff RM, Wedeen VJ. Cardiac diffusion tensor MRI in vivo without strain correction. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42(2):393-403.

4. Setsompop K, Gagoski BA, Polimeni JR, Witzel T, Wedeen VJ, Wald LL. Blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g-factor penalty. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67(5):1210-24.

5. Tsai D-Y, Lee Y, Matsuyama E. Information Entropy Measure for Evaluation of Image Quality. Journal of Digital Imaging. 2008;21(3):338-47.

6. Mekkaoui C, Huang S, Chen HH, et al. Fiber architecture in remodeled myocardium revealed with a quantitative diffusion CMR tractography framework and histological validation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012;14:70.

7. Reese TG, Weisskoff RM, Smith RN, Rosen BR, Dinsmore RE, Wedeen VJ. Imaging myocardial fiber architecture in vivo with magnetic resonance. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34(6):786-91.

8. Lau AZ, Tunnicliffe EM, Frost R, Koopmans PJ, Tyler DJ, Robson MD. Accelerated human cardiac diffusion tensor imaging using simultaneous multislice imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2015;73(3):995-1004.

Figures

Figure 1: Impact of spatiotemporal registration (STR) and entropy-based retrospective image selection (ERIS). Columns from left to right: uncorrected, ERIS only, STR only, and STR followed by ERIS. The quality of the HA, MD, and FA maps is highest when STR and ERIS are applied consecutively.

Figure 2: Comparison of breath-hold and free-breathing tractography of the left ventricle. The entire heart was imaged in under 15 minutes using breath-hold DTI with rate 3 SMS (A), and free-breathing DTI with rate 2 SMS (B). In both cases the derived tracts are coherent and correctly oriented.

Figure 3: Quantification of myocardial microstructure using breath-hold and free-breathing DTI. Seven healthy volunteers were imaged and the data compared using paired t-tests. No significant differences were seen in (A-C) MD, FA, and HA between the two groups.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3111