Relations between the stretched exponential DWI model and tumor malignancy related microstructural changes
Chu-Yu Lee1, Kevin M Bennett2, Josef P Debbins3, In-Young Choi1,4,5, and Phil Lee1,5

1Hoglund Brain Imaging Center, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas city, KS, United States, 2Department of Biology, University of Hawaii, Manoa, HI, United States, 3Neuroimaging research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States, 4Department of Neurology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States, 5Department of Molecular & Integrative Physiology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, United States

Synopsis

Diffusion weighting imaging (DWI) has been shown to be useful in differentiating low- and high-grade tumors in the brain. The decreased apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been associated with increased tumor cellularity. However, tumor malignancy involves multiple microstructural changes that may also affect changes in the ADC. The alternative way to assess water diffusion in the complex microstructure is through the diffusion heterogeneity measured by the stretched exponential model (α-DWI). Recent studies using the α-DWI model have shown the increased diffusion heterogeneity in high-grade tumors. However, it remains unclear about the microstructural information provided by the α. The purpose of this study was to investigate how the α-DWI model responds to tumor malignancy related microstructural changes. We simulated a 3-D microenvironment in tumors and a DWI experiment. We studied how ADC and the fitted parameters of the α-DWI model responded to microstructural changes related to tumor malignancy.

INTRODUCTION

Diffusion weighting imaging (DWI) has been shown to be useful in differentiating low- and high-grade tumors in the brain. The decreased apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in high-grade tumors has been associated with increased tumor cellularity 1. However, changes of the ADC may be associated with other microstructural changes related to tumor malignancy 2-4. An alternative way to assess water diffusion in the complex microstructure is through the diffusion heterogeneity measured by the stretched exponential model (α-DWI), S(b) = exp( ̶ b × DDC)α 5-7. Recent studies using the α-DWI model showed the increased diffusion heterogeneity in high-grade tumors 8-11. However, the relation between the α-DWI and the tissue microstructure remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate how the α-DWI model responds to tumor malignancy related microstructural changes. We simulated DWI experiments in 3-dimensional (3-D) microenvironments with varying microstructural parameters associated with tumor malignancy. We studied how ADC and the fitted parameters of the α-DWI model responded to the microstructural changes.

METHODS

3-D microenvironments in low-grade tumors were simulated through randomly packed spheres with a gamma distributed diameter (mean ± std: 10 ± 7 µm 12). Each sphere have two free-exchange compartments: nucleus and cytoplasm with their volumetric ratio (NC ratio): 6.4 % 4,13 and diffusivities: 1.17 and 0.3 × 10-3 mm2/s respectively 14 (Fig. 1a-b). The simulated cell volume fraction (VF) was 65 % 2,3. The extracellular diffusivity was determined based on the tortuosity measured in low-grade tumors 2-3: Dex = Dfree/(tortuosity)2 = 1.19 × 10-3 mm2/s. The cell membrane permeability was 0.03 mm/s 15,16. According to the histopathological studies in tumors, four independent microstructural changes related to tumor malignancy were simulated: decreased VF from 65 to 55 % 2,3, increased extracellular tortuosity (Tex) from 1.6 to 1.7 2,3, increased cell density by a factor of 3.6 1, and increased NC ratio from 6.4 to 21.6 % 13 (Fig. 1c). The cell density was computed as the number of cells per unit volume. A pulsed gradient spin-echo (PGSE) experiment in human DWI (δ/Δ= 40/46 ms, GMAX = 40 mT/m) was simulated using a Monte Carlo simulation developed in C++ 15,17. 40,000 spins were randomly distributed in the 3-D microenvironment and performed a random walk of 80,000 steps/sec. The spin phase accrual during applied diffusion gradients was computed to generate DWI signals with b-values up to 5500 s/mm2 in increments of 500 s/mm2. The signals were fitted with the α-DWI model using the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm in Matlab (Mathworks, Inc.). The ADC was computed with signals of b = 0 and 1000 s/mm2. The goodness of fit was assessed using the reduced chi-square statistic (χν2). Each simulation was repeated five times to quantify the precision.

RESULTS

All the data fits were within the 95 % confidence interval (0.3 < χν2 < 1.9) (Fig. 2). The increases of the ADC and DDC were related to the decreased VF and increased NC ratio. The percentage changes were 15.4, 16 % and 7.7, 9.8 %. Their decreases were related to the increased Tex and cell density. The percentage changes were ̶ 10.1, ̶ 11.1 % and ̶ 6.6, ̶ 4.8 %. Interestingly, the increase of the diffusion heterogeneity (decreased α) was specifically related to the decreased VF. The percentage change was ̶ 2.8 %. The decrease (increased α) was specifically related to the decreased Tex. The percentage change was 3.7 % compared to the percentage changes: 0.8 and 0.6 % in response to the increased cell density and NC ratio.

DISCUSSION

It has been postulated that the elevated cellularity in high-grade tumors is related to a decreased diffusivity. However, our results consistent with a previous finding 18 suggest that the increased NC ratio, despite being correlated with cellularity 19, may result in an increased diffusivity (Fig. 3). Our results also showed that the diffusion heterogeneity measured by the α was more specifically related to the microstructural changes in VF and Tex compared with the measured diffusivity (Fig. 3). This suggests that the diffusion heterogeneity may help better identify the changes in VF and Tex that are associated with the proliferation and mitotic activity in tumors 3.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that the diffusion heterogeneity measured by the α-DWI provided distinct information from the measured diffusivity, and specifically reflected tumor malignancy related microstructural changes in VF and Tex.

Acknowledgements

This work is partly supported by the National Institutes of Health (S10RR29577, UL1TR000001) and the Hoglund Family Foundation.

References

[1]. Sugahara T, et al, JMRI (9), 53-60, 1999.

[2]. Vargová L, et al, Glia. (42), 77-88, 2003.

[3]. Zámecník J, et al, Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. (30), 338-50, 2004.

[4]. Xu J, et al, MRM (61), 828-33, 2009.

[5]. Bennett KM, et al, MRM (50), 727-34, 2003.

[6]. Magin RL, et al, JMR (190), 255-70, 2008.

[7]. Hall MG, et al, MRM (59), 447-55, 2008.

[8]. Bennett KM, et al, MRM (52), 994-1004, 2004.

[9]. Kwee TC, et al, NMR Biomed (23), 179-87, 2010.

[10]. Sui Y, et al, Radiology (277), 489-96, 2015.

[11]. Bai Y, et al, Radiology, in press, 2015.

[12]. Aboitiz F, et al, Brain Res. (598), 143-53, 1992.

[13]. Slater DN, et al, Cytopathology (16), 179-92, 2005.

[14]. Grant SC, et al, MRM (46), 1107-12, 2001.

[15]. Szafer A, et al, MRM (33), 697-712, 1995.

[16]. Nilsson M, et al, MRM (69), 1573-81, 2013.

[17]. Hall MG, et al, IEEE TMI (28), 1354-64, 2009.

[18]. White NS, et al, MRM (72), 1435-43, 2014.

[19]. Guo AC, et al, Radiology (224), 177-83, 2002.

Figures

Fig. 1 a: simulated 3-D cell packing. b: 2-D cross-sectional illustration of simulated intracellular space: nucleus (dark gray) and cytoplasm (gray), and extracellular space (white). c: illustrations of microstructural alterations associated with tumor malignancy: decreased cell volume fraction (VF), increased cell density, and increased NC ratio.

Fig. 2 The α-DWI and ADC fits to the baseline signals generated in the simulated low-grade tumor microenviroment; α = 0.81, DDC = 0.38 × 10-3 mm2/s, and ADC = 0.46 × 10-3 mm2/s. The χν2 of the α-DWI fit was 1.31.

Fig. 3 Percentage changes of the fitted parameters with the simulated microstructural changes (Fig. 1c). Percentage changes were computed with respect to the fitted parameters obtained from the fits to the baseline signals (Fig. 2). Error bars present the standard deviations across the repeated experiments.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3080