Angular Complexity and Fractional Displacement Probability: New metrics for diffusion propagator imaging
Luis Miguel Lacerda1, Gareth Barker1, and Flavio Dell'Acqua1

1Department of Neuroimaging, The Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, United Kingdom

Synopsis

Several methods have been used to represent the diffusion signal, and recently novel multi-shell approaches like SHORE, have allowed analytical and continuous reconstruction of the diffusion propagator. In this study, we propose two new metrics to better characterize the propagator at different displacement radii, the Angular Complexity Index (ACI), as a measure of propagator anisotropy, and the Fractional Displacement Probability (FDP), as index of relative mean displacement probability within fixed displacement bands. Furthermore, we display preliminary results that suggest sensitivity to microstructural organisation at different displacement scales, as opposed to traditional propagator metrics that reduce it to single scalar maps.

Target Audience

Researchers and Clinicians developing and using diffusion imaging methods to study tissue microstructure

Introduction

Diffusion imaging is an established technique that provides in vivo information about the architecture of the brain and allows extraction of measures of its integrity. Several methods have been used to characterize the diffusion signal, and recently novel multi-shell methods have allowed analytical and continuous reconstruction of the diffusion propagator. The Simple Harmonic Oscillator based Reconstruction and Estimation (SHORE)1 is one such method, and has been shown to provide better tissue contrast in propagator-based metrics than inherently incomplete discrete methods like DSI2. However, existing metrics reduce the rich information present in the diffusion propagator to single scalar maps and discard potentially useful information about microstructure at the different scales probed by the propagator. In this study, we propose two new metrics to better characterize the diffusion propagator at different displacement radii, the Angular Complexity Index (ACI), as a measure of propagator anisotropy, and the Fractional Displacement Probability (FDP), as index of relative mean displacement probability within fixed displacement bands. Preliminary results are here presented on healthy in-vivo data.

Methods

Data acquisition: Diffusion MRI data were acquired from a single healthy normal volunteer using a 3T GE Signa HDx and consisted of sampling q-space on 6 different shells defined by b-values: 500, 750, 1000, 1500, 2000 and 3000 mm2/s. The number of directions for each shell was {20;20;40;40;60;60} respectively, and an additional {2;2;4;4;6;6} non-diffusion weighted volumes were collected alongside each shell. Acquisition parameters were the following for all shells: voxel size 2x2x2 mm, matrix = 128x128, FOV=256x56 mm, 70 slices, 1 average, TE=78 ms, using a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence with an ASSET (parallel imaging) factor of 2. Peripheral gating was applied with effective TR of 12 R-R intervals. Additionally, an inversion recovery prepared spoiled gradient echo (IR-SPGR) structural image was acquired and used to perform EPI distortions correction of all diffusion data with ExploreDTI3, combined with motion and eddy current distortion correction.

Data Processing: After pre-processing, all shells were used to fit the coefficients of the 3D-SHORE basis, as implemented in dipy4, and the diffusion propagator was computed at a maximum displacement of 40$$$\mu m$$$, in a volume of 35x35x35 points, yielding a resolution of approximately 2$$$\mu m$$$. The ACI was then calculated as the “angular” standard deviation of the propagator over the sphere at displacement ($$$r$$$), normalized by the integral of the overall displacement probability:$$$ACI(r)=std(Propagator(r))/\int_{}^{} Propagator$$$. FDP maps were computed as the ratio between the integral defined within a displacement band demarcated by two radii $$$(r_{1},r_{2})$$$ and the total propagator integral as:$$$FDP(B) = \int_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}}Propagator /\int_{}^{} Propagator$$$. For both ACI and FDP maps, radii and bands can be chosen as required by the experiment. In this study we computed ACI at 2,10,16,22 and 28$$$\mu m$$$; the radii chosen for ACI computation defined the upper and lower limits of four different FDP bands, [A,B,C,D], respectively from 2-10,10-16,16-22 and 22-28$$$\mu m$$$.

Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows that by measuring ACI at different ranges it is possible to extract different anisotropy contrasts from the diffusion propagator enabling the retrieval of anisotropic information that is characteristic of specific displacements ranges. In the enlarged region, different ACI contrasts can be identified in the region of the corona radiata (Fig1 red arrows) suggesting a different sensitivity to microstructural organisation at different displacement scales. Similarly, Figure 2 shows that with FDP maps it is possible to identify different probability of displacement within different displacement bands. For smaller displacement bands (Fig2.A), higher probabilities are confined to tissue with high restriction like white matter while for higher bands we see contribution only from CSF tissue (Fig2.D). While still preserving a model independent approach it was possible to identify and classify different tissues by looking at their characteristic displacement pattern in the different bands. These maps can potentially be used for new segmentations approaches and may also be able to better inform tractography algorithms in areas of complex microstructural configurations.

Conclusion

In this study we have presented a new set of model independent diffusion metrics that extent the amount of information that can be extracted from the diffusion propagator. The additional contrast provided by ACI and FDP maps is complementary to currently existing and more global propagator metrics, such as return-to-origin probability (RT0P) and Mean squared Displacement (MSD) since they are specific only to selected ranges of diffusion displacements1. These maps have the potential to provide further insight and facilitate exploration of brain microstructure organisation even when no a-priori biophysical model is available.

Acknowledgements

The author Luis Miguel Lacerda would like to acknowledge GE/EPSRC/Case award for funding; the author Gareth J. Barker receives honoraria from teaching from GE Healthcare, and acts as a consultant for IXICO; the author Flavio Dell’Acqua acknowledges BRC and Welcome Trust for funding.

References

[1] – Özarslan et al. Neuroimage. 2013; 78: 16:32. [2] – Zucchelli et al, p4294, ISMRM 2014. [3] – Leemans et al, p3537 ISMRM 2009. [4] – Garyfallidis et al. Front. Neuroinformatics. 2014. 8.

Figures

Angular complexity Index (ACI): “angular” standard deviation of the propagator over the sphere at different displacement radii. Five different ACI profiles are displayed and enable different contrast, suggesting sensitivity to microstructural organisation at different displacement scales.

Fractional Displacement Probability (FDP): ratio of displacement probabilities within fixed displacement bands and the total propagator integral. Four FDP bands are shown and enable identification of different profiles of displacement probabilities for particular displacements.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3045