Whole-body diffusion weighted imaging in multiple myeloma: Temporal changes of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion parameters following treatment. Initial experience at 3.0T
Arash Latifoltojar1, Margaret Hall-Craggs2, Nikolaos Dikaios1, Kwee Yong1, Neil Rabin2, Alan Bainbridge2, Magdalena Sokolska2, and Shonit Punwani1

1University College London, London, United Kingdom, 2University College London Hospital, London, United Kingdom

Synopsis

Diffusion weighted imaging's apparent diffusion coeffiecient (ADC) has been shown to be a potential imaging biomarker for monitoring treatment response in multiple myeloma. However, in most instances, a mono- exponential fitting model is used to assess temporal changes. In this work, we investigated the Gaussian and non-Gaussian fitting algorithms and their respective quantitative biomarkers for assessing response in multiple myeloma using whole body diffusion weighted imaging.

Introduction

Whole-body diffusion weighted MRI (WB-DWI) is gaining widespread recognition in initial evaluation and treatment response monitoring of bone marrow disease in multiple myeloma (MM). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) has been shown to have the potential for assessing response and discriminating responder and non-responder groups in MM [1,2]. However, mono-exponential DWI model (Gaussian model), widely used in vendors’ generated ADC maps, is predisposed to fitting errors [3]. Non-Gaussian fitting algorithms might be more accurate and provide further details of microstructural changes of bone marrow [4]. This study aims to evaluate WB-DWI’s biomarkers in focal lesions (FLs) of newly diagnosed MM patients prior to (Pre) and 8 weeks (8W) following Bortezomib-based chemotherapy.

Material and Methods

Twenty-one patients (13 male, median age 52 (range 36-69)) with biopsy proven MM were enrolled prospectively. Free breathing axial diffusion weighted echo planar imaging (DWI-EPI) with spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) plus slice selective gradient reversal (SSGR) fat suppression (TR/TE 6371/71ms, slice thickness 5mm, pixel bandwidth 3369Hz, acquisition matrix 124*72, SENSE factor 2.5, number of slices 40, b-values; 0, 100, 300 and 1000 s/mm2) was acquired from vertex to toe. Skeleton was divided to 10 anatomical locations. Images were reviewed by two radiologists in consensus and prospectively scored (0 - non-diagnostic quality images; 1=unlikely, 2=indeterminate, 3=likely and 4=highly likely disease) for the presence of focal lesions (FLs). Up to 4 largest FLs > 5mm and scored 3/4 selected for each anatomical site, to a maximum of 20 FLs per patient. A region of interest (ROI) was drawn around the focal lesion on b1000 images and then transferred to b0, 100 and 300 images (figure 1). Mean signal intensity (SI) was recorded at each b-value. Three diffusion models were used to fit the signal decay using an in-house MATLAB script: mono-exponential, stretched exponential (SE) and diffusion kurtosis models (DKI) [4, 5]. Mono-exponential diffusion coefficient (Dmono, ADC), diffusion coefficient (DSE) and heterogeneity index (α) from SE, and diffusion coefficient (DDKI) and diffusional kurtosis index (K) from DKI were calculated. All focal lesions were re-evaluated following treatment. Disease response was assessed by international myeloma working group (IMWG) criteria after termination of induction therapy and patients were assigned to responder and non-responder groups [6]. Difference in MRI biomarkers between Pre and 8W studies for each group was assessed by Wilcoxon test.

Results

There were 15 responders and 6 non-responders after induction chemotherapy. In total 254 focal lesions underwent quantitative biomarker analysis. The median number of lesions evaluated per patient was 14 [range 1 to 18]. The number of lesions evaluated in responders and non-responders was 186 [median 14, range1- 18] and 68 [median 12, range 7-15] respectively. There was no significant difference in per patient median lesion count between the two groups (p=0.33). Dmono increased significantly in responders (median ADC 0.80 and 1.45 x 10-3 mm2/s at Pre and 8W respectively, p=0.002) but not in non-responders (median ADC 0.61 and 0.68 x 10-3 mm2/s at baseline and early post-treatment respectively; p=0.22) (figure 2). DSE and α both significantly increased in responders (median DSE 0.95 and 1.49 at Pre and 8W respectively, p=0.003 and α of 0.77 and 0.81 at Pre and 8W respectively, p= 0.03) whilst no changes observed in non-responders (median DSE 0.52 and 0.58 at Pre and 8W respectively, p=0.22 and α of 0.70 and 0.73 at Pre and 8W respectively, p= 0.31)(figure 3). There was a significant increase of DDKI in responders (median 1.34 and 1.86 at pre and 8W respectively, p= 0.002) and a significant decrease of K (median 1.35 and 0.84 at pre and 8W respectively, p=0.02) following treatment. No significant changes of DDKI and K were observed in non-responder group (median DDKI and K of 1.00 and 1.94 at Pre and 1.20 and 2.04 at 8W respectively, p=0.43 and 0.56) (figure 4).

Discussion and Conclusion

In line with previous publications [1, 2] we demonstrated significant increase of Dmono in responders whilst no significant changes were observed for non-responders. Furthermore, we showed that similar pattern of temporal changes of DSE and DDKI occur in these groups. Observed changes of α, K in responders might be attributed to underlying accelerated destruction of the bone marrow by FLs, creating expanded spaces where behavior of water molecules move towards mono-exponential model. On the other hand, absence of any significant changes of biomarkers in non-responders could be related to a more conserved marrow structure at early phases of treatment. Longitudinal assessment of DWI related biomarkers might provide more insight to long-term changes of bone marrow following completion of treatment, remission or relapse of the disease.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

[1] Horger M, Weisel K, Horge W et al. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI with apparent diffusion coefficient mapping for early response monitoring in multiple myeloma: Preliminary results. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2011;196(6): W790-W795.

[2] Giles S.L, Messiou C, Collins D.J et al. Whole-Body Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Assessment of Treatment Response in Myeloma. Radiology. 2014; 271(3):785-94.

[3] Filli L, Wurnig M, Nanz D et al. Whole-body diffusion kurtosis imaging: initial experience on non-Gaussian diffusion in various organs.2014;49(12):773-778.

[4] Jambor A, Merisaari H, Taimen P et al. Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: A repeatability study. MRM.2015;73:1988-1998

[5] Yuan J, Yeung DK, Mok GS et al. Non-Gaussian analysis of diffusion weighted imaging in head and neck at 3T: a pilot study in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. PLoS One. 2014;23;9(1):e87024.

[6] Durie BGM, Harousseau J-L, Miguel JS et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2006;20; 1467-1473.

Figures

Representative images of b0(a), b100(b), b300(c) and b1000(d) diffusion weighted imaging of a myelomatous focal lesion at left femoral neck. Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion weighted parameters derived using mean signal intensity from each b-value.

Box and whisker plot for temporal changes of ADC (Dmono) in both groups. The boundaries of the box show 25th and 75th percentiles, and the line within the box is the median. Whiskers show 10th and 90th percentiles. Means (+) and outliers (•) are shown.

Box and whisker plot for temporal changes of stretched exponential diffusion parameters in both groups. The boundaries of the box show 25th and 75th percentiles, and the line within the box is the median. Whiskers show 10th and 90th percentiles. Means (+) and outliers (•) are shown.

Box and whisker plot for temporal changes of diffusion kurtosis parameters in both groups. The boundaries of the box show 25th and 75th percentiles, and the line within the box is the median. Whiskers show 10th and 90th percentiles. Means (+) and outliers (•) are shown.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
3043