zhongbiao xu1, Yanqiu Feng1, Wufan Chen1, Zhigang Wu2, Ha-kyu Jeong3, Wenxing Fang2, Yingjie Mei1,4, Li Guo1, and Feng Huang2
1School of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of, 2Philips Healthcare (Suzhou), Suzhou, China, People's Republic of, 3Philips Korea, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 4Philips Healthcare, Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
Though cMUSE proposed by our group tackles the pixels mismatch of
macroscopic motion in multi-shot EPI by clustering and registration, it neglects altered gradient directions. In this work, we treat motion induced variations in gradient direction as addtional diffusion direction(s). The proposed method simply and effectively solves the gradient direction
alternation due to macroscopic motion in multi-shot DTI.Purpose
Multi-shot EPI has been an alternative method of single-shot EPI in DTI acquisition
due to reduced distortion and improved spatial resolution [1]. However, subjects’
involuntary motion often challenges this technique. Namely, miniscule motion during diffusion gradient will
induce shot-to-shot phase variations, leading to ghosting artifact.
Furthermore, macroscopic
motion
will introduce pixels mismatch, causing images blurring, and altered diffusion
directions, resulting in inaccurate tensor estimations. The famous MUSE [2] and
IRIS [3] well resolve the miniscule motion
induced shot-to-shot phase variations, but not account for macroscopic motion. Though
cMUSE [4] proposed by our group tackles the pixels mismatch of macroscopic
motion, it neglects altered gradient directions and has the limitation on net
acceleration factor due to the dependence on SENSE reconstruction. The goal of
this work is to address the altered diffusion direction issue from macroscopic
motion in multi-shot DTI while avoiding the drawback of limited acceleration
factor in cMUSE.
Methods
IRIS extracts phase
information from low resolution and high SNR navigator images, thus avoids the
limitation on acceleration factor. Here, we propose a novel IRIS-based method,
named clustered IRIS (CIRIS) based on the idea of cMUSE and the advantage of
IRIS. CIRIS firstly classifies the navigator images into clusters which have no
macroscopic intra-cluster motion using the method suggested in cMUSE. After
that, intermediate images are reconstructed with the clustered navigator data
and corresponding image data by using IRIS. For DWI, these intermediate images
are combined using weighted average after registration to generate the final
reconstruction. For DTI, they are registered to the non-DW image and the
rotation matrix from registration is used to calculate the actual gradient
direction to compensate motion’s effect on diffusion
encoding gradient directions. Next, the registered images and
corrected gradient directions are used to calculate the diffusion tensor. That
is to say, we treat motion induced variations in gradient direction as updated
diffusion direction(s), instead of correcting these directions as in AMUSE [5].
The performance of CIRIS
was evaluated on multi-shot EPI brain data acquired on a Philips Multiva 1.5T
scanner (Philips healthcare, Suzhou, China) using an 8-channel head coil. The acquisition parameters include: 1) DWI scan: number
of shots (NS) =3, SENSE factor (SF) =2, number of signal averages (NSA) =6; 2)
DTI scan: NS=2, SF=2, NSA=12,
number of diffusion gradients=10. For each scan, two datasets were acquired: a
stationary dataset used as gold-standard and a motion dataset where the
volunteer was asked to rotate his head 4 times during the scan. Two
quantitative measures were used to assess tensor accuracy: 1) angular deviation (A) between the major eigenvectors of
the gold-standard image and the reconstructed images; 2) roots mean square
error (RMSE) in fractional anisotropy (FAerr) compared to the
golden standard. Two regions of interest (ROIs) were selected in the genu and
splenium of the corpus callosum (GCC and SCC). All processing was performed
using Matlab (2.33GHZ, 4GM RAM).
Results
The total
computation time except registration is 5.60s per direction for DTI. Fig.1 compares
the reconstructions with IRIS, cMUSE and CIRIS on DWI motion dataset with an acceleration
factor 6. Compared to IRIS (Fig.1a) and cMUSE (Fig.1b), CIRIS (Fig.1c) gave a
clear improvement in image quality. Fig.2 shows the reconstructed images with
different methods and the corresponding angular deviation maps in GCC and SCC. For macroscopic motion dataset, IRIS (Fig.2a) produced significant image blurring, causing
large angular deviation. Using the proposed method, the artifact was removed
and thus the angular deviation was significantly reduced (Fig.2b and Fig.2c). When
accounting for altered diffusion direction, the lower angular deviation was achieved
(Fig.2c vs. Fig.2b). Table 1 further
demonstrates that the tensor measurements were more accurate using CIRIS with
gradient correction.
Discussion
The proposed method corrects the pixels mismatch by clustering and
registration, and treats motion induced gradient direction variations as updated
diffusion direction(s). Because motion is estimated from navigator data, the
proposed method overcomes the limitation of acceleration factor in cMUSE
(Fig.1c vs. Fig.1b). Compared to AMUSE [5], CIRIS has lower computational cost
due to the clustering, and avoids diffusion direction correction.
Conclusion
The proposed method simply and effectively solves the gradient direction
alternation due to macroscopic motion in multi-shot DTI while avoiding the
shortcomings of cMUSE
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]
Bammer, R. European Journal of Radiology 2003, 40:169-184 [2] Chen, N-k. et.al.
NeuroImage 2013;72:41-47 [3] Jeong, H-k. et.al. MRM 2013; 69:793-802 [4] Xu, Z-b.
et.al. ISMRM 2015, p961 [5] Guhaniyogi, S. et.al. MRM DOI 10.1002/mrm.25624