Synopsis
Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Tractography
Reconstructions (DKI-TR) are often performed using high quality data. In
clinical practice, that is often not possible, as only a lower number of
b-values and diffusion gradient directions can be acquired. This study assessed
the performance of DKI-TR for the two algorithms currently proposed for DKI-TR
using variable amounts of data, and looked at their respective structural
connectivity metrics. A 64 gradient direction data set was acquired in six
healthy subjects, and down-sampled to 21 and 32 directions. Differences were
found between gradient sets and also between algorithms, regarding the
reconstructions and the connectivity metrics.Introduction
Diffusion Kurtosis
Imaging (DKI) can take into account the presence of crossing fibers when
performing tractography to reconstruct the brain’s white matter. The increased
sensitivity compared to Diffusion Tensor Imaging may lead to more accurate
representations of structural connectivity. At present, there are only two deterministic
streamline algorithms for DKI-based tractography: an ODF-based algorithm,
proposed by Lazar et al.1 and a KT-based algorithm, proposed by
Neto-Henriques et al.2. Studies using these algorithms have always
used large amounts of data (high number of diffusion directions and sometimes
also more than the minimum of 3 b-values required). However, no study had yet
been performed to assess the algorithms’ robustness when using the minimum data
requirements. In this study we sought to explore the performance of the
DKI-based algorithms when performing whole-brain tractography using different
numbers of diffusion directions. We also looked at the variation in
connectivity metrics calculated for the structural networks obtained from the
different reconstructions.
Methodology
Six
healthy subjects were scanned (3 females) with mean±standard deviation age of
30±5 years.
A 3T Siemens Trio scanner was used for the acquisition, equipped
with a 32-channel head coil.
The anatomical MRI scan included a
T1-weighted MPRAGE sequence, with TR=2250ms, TE=2.98ms, TI=900ms,
FOV=256x256mm2, slice thickness of 1mm and voxel size of 1x1x1mm3.
The
diffusion MRI acquisition sequence used was a Twice Refocused Spin Echo,
Echo-Planar Imaging, with TR=9400ms, TE=104ms, acquisition matrix=94x94, voxel
size of 2x2x2mm3, and 64 equally spaced gradient directions per shell, at
b-values of 0, 1000 or 2000s.mm-2.
Datasets
of 21 and 32 gradient directions were extracted from the original data, using
subsets of 21 and 32 directions of the original 64. The criterion used to
select each subset was having the lowest electrostatic repulsion amongst the
chosen directions, out of 5x106 possible arrangements.
For
anatomical parcellation and registration, the all-in-one MIBCA toolbox3 was
used. To fit both diffusion and kurtosis tensors, extract the metrics and
perform tract reconstructions, uDKI4 was used. Tract reconstructions were based on the ODF- and KT-based algorithms1,2.
To inspect the tractography results and obtain tractography related statistics,
TrackVis5 was used. Whole-brain network studies were
accomplished with MIBCA and encompassed the computation and comparison of adjacency matrices for 78 brain regions based on
the Destrieux brain atlas (provided by Freesurfer6) and also the
comparison of the global network metrics: Characteristic Path Length (Lambda),
Transitivity, Global Efficiency, and Small-Worldness, computed using the Brain
Connectivity Toolbox7.
Results and Discussion
Figure 1
shows the number of tracts reconstructed per algorithm and per number of
directions considered. For every set of directions, the KT algorithm shows a
reduced number of computed tracts, when compared to the ODF algorithm. This
difference decreases when the number of acquired gradient directions increases.
Figures 2 and 3 show the mean adjacency matrices of the computed networks based on the
tractography reconstructions. In Table 1, the Dice coefficients for all of the
pairs of matrices are displayed.
The
adjacency matrices revealed that the KT algorithm reconstructs lesser and weaker
connections for 21 directions, when faced against the ODF algorithm. With
the increase in considered directions, the difference becomes smaller,
suggesting that the results obtained by both algorithms tend to overlay at higher numbers of gradient directions.
This is also supported by the Dice coefficients: both reconstructions based on
64 directions show high degree of overlap. Additionally, the highest overlap was observed between
21 directions and 32 directions ODF reconstructions, and the lowest between 21
and 64 directions KT reconstructions.
The observed difference may be due to the
fact that the KT algorithm has an increased angular sensitivity2. When sampling a lower number of directions, the uncertainty in the eigenvectors for each
voxel tends to increase, and thus the uncertainty cone widens, leading to
weaker reconstructions using streamline algorithms, which do not consider these
variations.
The
global connectivity metrics obtained from all of the computed networks are
displayed in Table 2. These are mean±standard deviation values across the
6 subjects considered.
Once again, the ODF algorithm showed better consistency
in results than the KT algorithm. Nevertheless, the metrics seem to converge to
a common value for both algorithms.
Conclusion
Overall, the ODF
algorithm seems more robust to the downsampling of gradient directions than the
KT algorithm in tractography reconstruction. This may be helpful in clinical
practice and pre-surgical planning, where the amount of data acquired is often
limited due to time constraints. In the future it would be interesting to
quantify the cone of uncertainty associated to the estimated directions for
both models and apply validation methods such as those of Tractometer
8.
Acknowledgements
Research supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT) and Ministério da Ciência e Educação (MCE) Portugal (PIDDAC) under grants UID/BIO/00645/2013, PTDC/SAU-ENB/120718/2010, and FCT Investigator Program, grant IF/00364/2013.
MRI scanning was funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC), UK
References
1. Lazar, M., Jensen, J. H., Xuan, L., Helpern, J. A. Estimation of the orientation distribution function from diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magn
Reson Med. 2008, 60, 774-81.
2. Neto-Henriques, R., Correia, M., Nunes, R. G., Ferreira, H. A. (2015) Exploring the 3D geometry of the diffusion kurtosis tensor—Impact on the development of robust tractography procedures and novel biomarkers, NeuroImage, 111, 85-99
3. Ribeiro AS, Lacerda LM, Ferreira HA. (2015) Multimodal Imaging Brain Connectivity Analysis (MIBCA) toolbox. PeerJ 3:e1078
4. Neto Henriques, R., Ferreira, H.A., Correia, M.M., 2015. United Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging (UDKI) toolbox. MAGMA 28 (S1): 511-512
5. Ruopeng Wang, Van J. Wedeen, TrackVis.org, Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital
6. Fischl, B. (2012). FreeSurfer. Neuroimage, 62(2), 774-781.
7. Rubinov, M., & Sporns, O. (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage, 52(3), 1059-1069.
8. Côté, M.A., Girard, G., Boré, A., Garyfallidis, E., Houde, J.C., Descoteaux, M. Tractometer: Towards validation of tractography pipelines, Medical Image Analysis, 17(7) ,844 - 857