Artifacts Affecting Derivative of $$$B_1^+$$$ maps for EPT Reconstructions
Stefano Mandija1, Alessandro Sbrizzi1, Astrid L.H.M.W. van Lier1, Peter R. Luijten1, and Cornelis A.T. van den Berg1

1Center For Image Sciences, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands

Synopsis

EPT conductivity reconstruction is affected by difficulties to reliably calculate spatial derivatives on voxelized MRI data. Here, we explore the impact of several numerical approximations. In particular: the different size of finite-difference kernels and the k-space truncation (always present in MR images). We also explore a Fourier-domain alternative, which does not require finite-difference approximation kernels.

Introduction

Electric Properties Tomography (EPT) of tissue is performed through electromagnetic analysis of complex $$$B_1^+$$$ maps1,2,3. A key challenge is the calculation of first and second order spatial derivatives of phase maps near tissue boundaries. The inaccurate reconstruction is due to the invalidity of the electromagnetic reconstruction models4,5,6 and the difficulties to calculate spatial derivatives on voxelized data.

In this study, we investigate the latter aspect by exploring the impact in EPT reconstruction of: different size of finite-difference kernels (K); k-space truncation on the approximated second order spatial derivatives ($$$\frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2}$$$) of the B1+ phase. We demonstrate that there is a fundamental limitation to accurately calculate $$$\frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2}$$$ and we explore alternative strategies with theoretically milder artifact levels.

Theory

Phase-only EPT conductivity reconstruction7, is closely related to the analysis of second order phase derivatives. This reconstruction (Fig. 1/A eq.1) is affected by two main numerical approximations coming from: truncated k-space data (image convolution with a kernel W) (Fig. 1/A eq.2); the use of finite-difference kernels K (Fig. 1/A eq.3). The concurrent action of W and K (Fig. 1/A eq.4) explains the notorious errors in σEPT(r) reconstruction.

Exact Phase Derivatives (EPD)8 can be instead calculated in the Fourier domain without making use of the convolution with K-kernels (Fig.1/B, eqs.5-6). However, as shown in Fig. 1/B eqs.7-8, noise in the high frequencies is amplified by (2πik)n. This could be mitigated by using appropriate truncation strategies. In Fig. 1/C, the effect of a Gaussian window (wG) is compared to a standard boxcar (wB).

Methods

We first explored by means of simulations the impact of different finite-difference K-kernel sizes and of the k-space truncation (W) on $$$\frac{\partial^2}{\partial r^2}$$$ for σEPT(r) reconstruction. Two different geometrical structures were investigated.

Secondly, we investigated the possibility to reconstruct conductivity maps by computing EPD directly in frequency domain (σEPD(r)), therefore independently from K-kernels. The impact of the truncating windows wG and wB was also explored. σEPT(r) maps were compared to σEPD (r) maps through simulations and measurements.

Measurements were performed on a phantom (Fig. 2)9 in a 3T MR scanner10. Simulations were performed in Matlab11 using the same dimensions/properties of the phantom and a realistic $$$B_1^+$$$ phase map. Phase-only conductivity reconstruction was considered.

Results and Discussion

Figure 3/a-c shows that larger K-kernels sizes lead to more extended boundary errors, resulting into edges smoothing. The unavoidable truncation of k-space results in an additional artifact in image domain (Gibbs ringing) which corrupts σEPT(r) reconstruction (Fig. 3/b-d). In particular, as shown in the plots of Fig. 3 and by the coefficient of variation (CV(σEPT)=SD(σEPT)/mean(σEPT), for region 4 as an example), the ringing effect perturbation depends on the mutual position of different compartments. Comparison between truncated (Fig. 3/b-d) and non-truncated (Fig. 3/a-c) k-space reconstructions shows that the Gibbs ringing artifact is not negligible. This artifact can be mitigated if larger differentiation kernels are adopted (because of their smoothing effect) (Fig. 3/b-d). However, this is not a desirable solution since larger K-kernels sizes introduce larger boundary error extent.

The EPD approach, which is independent on differentiation kernels, was also explored (Fig. 1-4). Simulated and measured σEPD(r) maps (Fig. 4/b-c-f-g) seem to detect tissue boundaries better than σEPT(r) maps (Fig. 4/a-e). However, σEPD(r) maps result corrupted if a boxcar window is used to truncate the k-space (Fig. 4/b-f). Small perturbations in the K-space periphery are amplified by the multiplicative factors (2πik)n (Fig. 1, Eq. 7-8) and thus lead to high frequency fluctuations in image space. However, when a truncating Gaussian window is applied, these fluctuations are less pronounced (Fig. 4/c-g). As shown in (Fig. 1/c), the impact of high frequency perturbations is strongly attenuated. Gibbs ringing is reduced, although this effect will always be present at boundaries due to K-space truncation.

Conclusions

In addition to model invalidities, EPT reconstructions are also affected by artifacts related to the truncation of k-space, and the use of differentiation kernels. Our results show that the effect of k-space truncation is not negligible and it depends on structure geometry. In addition, the boundary error extent is larger for larger K-kernels sizes.

A new frequency-domain reconstruction technique, independent on differentiation kernel was explored. This technique is still affected by perturbations but, when combined with appropriate apodization windows, it might enhance the detection of structure boundaries. Although our analysis was limited to second order phase derivatives, our findings could also be extended to first and second derivatives of $$$B_1^+$$$ amplitude or to any other derivative-based reconstruction technique like Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the DeNeCor project being part of the ENIAC Joint Undertaking.

References

[1] Haacke EM, et al. Phys Med Biol 1991;36:723–734.

[2] Wen H. In Proceedings SPIE 5030, Medical Imaging: Physics of Medical Imaging. San Diego, CA, USA, 2003. pp. 471–477.

[3] Katscher U, et al. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2009;28:1365–1374.

[4] Liu J, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Sep;74(3):634-46.

[5] Sodickson D, et al. In Proceedings of the 21th Annual Meeting of ISMRM, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, 2013. p. 4175.

[6] Seo JK, et al. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2012;31:430–437.

[7] van Lier ALHMW, et al. Magn Reson Med 2012;67:552-561.

[8] de Leeuw H, et al. NeuroImage 2012;60:818–829.

[9] Stogryn A. IEEE Trans Microw Theory Tech 1971;19:733-736.

[10] Ingenia, Philips, Best, The Netherlands.

[11] Matlab 2013a, The MathWoks, Inc..

Figures

Figure 1: (A) Conductivity reconstruction using phase-only EPT. (B) Conductivity reconstruction using Exact Phase Derivatives (EPD) in Fourier domain. (C) Truncating windows wB and wG and their multiplication with (2πik)n, with n= 1, 2, for first and second order derivatives.

Figure 2: A) Geometry, dimensions and composition of the phantom used in measurements and simulations. B) MR sequence parameters used in measurements.

Figure 3: (A-C) Effect of different finite-difference kernels K on σEPT maps for two different placements of inner conductive compartments. (B-D) Effect of ringing artifact combined with finite-difference kernels in reconstructed σEPT maps. (Profiles) Constructive and destructive effect of ringing artifact depends on mutual position of inner compartments.

Figure 4: Simulations and measurements of: (A-E) Phase-only EPT conductivity reconstruction. Conductivity reconstruction using EPD with a Boxcar window (B-F) and Gaussian window (C-G). Profiles over two conductive compartments (D-H). The boundary effect is always present. However, σEPD maps seem to enhance delineation of structure boundaries.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2989