Using frequency difference mapping to assess white matter microstructure in the human corpus callosum
Benjamin Tendler1 and Richard Bowtell1

1Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom

Synopsis

Frequency difference mapping (FDM) is a recently developed phase-based technique that takes advantage of the non-linear temporal evolution of the phase in GE sequences to produce images that are sensitive to white matter microstructure. Images can be produced simply from raw phase data, with minimal post-processing. In this study 10 subjects underwent six repeats of a single-slice, sagittal multi-echo GE scan on the mid-line. Frequency difference maps reproducibly depicted white matter tracts oriented perpendicular to the applied field. Fitting the FD and magnitude data to a three-pool model provided insight into the variation of microstructure along the corpus callosum.

Introduction

Non-linear phase evolution and non-exponential magnitude decay are observed when examining the variation of signal from white matter regions with echo time in high-field GE imaging. This behaviour results from the interference of signals from microstructural compartments with different frequency offsets [1,2]. It can be characterised by using a three-pool model [1-3] which incorporates the contributions from the external, myelin and axonal compartments :

$$F(t)=A_ae^{i2{\pi}f_at-\frac{t}{T_{2a}^{*}}}+A_me^{i2\pi f_mt-\frac{t}{T_{2m}^{*}}}+A_ee^{i2{\pi}f_et-\frac{t}{T_{2e}^{*}}} \qquad\qquad (1)$$

where $$$a$$$, $$$m$$$ & $$$e$$$ denote the axonal, myelin and external pools, $$$A_{a,m,e} $$$ are the relative signal amplitudes, $$$T_{2a,m,e}^{*}$$$ are the $$$T_{2}^{*}$$$ relaxation times and $$$f_{a,m,e}$$$ are the frequency offsets. Frequency difference mapping (FDM) [3-5] takes advantage of this non-linear temporal evolution of the phase in GE sequences to produce images that carry information about white matter microstructure, with a particular sensitivity to the rapidly decaying signal from the myelin pool. Here, we applied GE imaging at 7T to 10 subjects who were each scanned six times. The resulting data demonstrate the capability of FDM and show that fits of the FD and magnitude data to the three-pool model provided insight into the variation of microstructure along the corpus callosum.

Theory

The signal measured in a GE sequence takes the form :

$$S(t)=S_{0}e^{i\Omega t}e^{i\phi_{0}}F(t) \qquad\qquad \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\quad(2)$$

where $$$\Omega$$$ & $$$\phi_{0}$$$ represent the effects of non-local field sources and time-independent phase offsets respectively, with $$$F(t)$$$ as defined in Equation (1). To observe the non-linear signal evolution, it is necessary to remove the dependence on $$$\Omega$$$ & $$$\phi_{0}$$$. $$$\phi_{0}$$$ can be eliminated by dividing each echo by $$$S(\text{TE}_1)$$$:

$$S'(\text{TE}_n )=\frac{S({\text{TE}}{_n})}{S(\text{TE}_1)}=e^{-iΩ(n-1)∆{\text{TE}}}×\frac{F(\text{TE}_n)}{F(\text{TE}_1)} \qquad\qquad\qquad(3) $$

Non-local field effects, $$$\Omega$$$, can be removed by dividing $$$S'(\text{TE}_n )$$$ by $$$(S'(\text{TE}_2))^{n-1}$$$:

$$S''(\text{TE}_n)=\frac{S'(\text{TE}_n )}{(S'(\text{TE}_2))^{n-1}}=\frac{F(\text{TE}_n )}{F(\text{TE}_1 )}×\left(\frac{F(\text{TE}_1)}{F(\text{TE}_2)}\right)^{n-1} \qquad (4)$$

yielding a signal that is sensitive to the non-linear phase evolution, which is predominantly driven by the rapid decay of the signal from the myelin pool.

Method

Using a Philips Achieva 7T MR scanner, 10 healthy subjects underwent a series of single-slice, sagittal multi-echo GE scans (slice thickness=5mm, resolution=1mm2 ,FOV=224x224mm2, TE1=2.4ms, ΔTE=2.4ms, # of echoes=20, TR=140ms, flip angle=25o, # of averages=10, acquisition time=314s). The slice was positioned on the mid-line, spanning a portion of the corpus callosum where the fibres are oriented perpendicular to B0. Each subject was scanned six times. Frequency difference maps were generated using the method outlined above, with an additional step involving fitting and subtraction of a term describing linear phase variation in the read-direction (foot-head), resulting from small differences of echo position in the acquisition window. Magnitude and frequency difference curves for 5 ROIs over the corpus callosum [6] (Figure 1) were fitted to Equations (1&4) for each subject.

Results

Figure 2 shows the evolution of the frequency difference with TE for a single representative subject, while Figure 3 shows FD maps for the 10 different subjects at TE=12 ms. Figure 4 shows average magnitude and frequency difference curves from all subjects for the 5 ROIs spanning the corpus callosum. Figure 5 shows the three-pool model parameters that provide the best fit to the experimental data from the 5 regions of the corpus callosum in the 10 subjects.

Discussion

Figures 2 and 3 show that corpus callosum and other structures such as the superior cerebellar peduncles, in which nerve fibers are oriented perpendicular to the field appear consistently hypointense in the FD maps. The negative frequency difference results from the decay of the signal from the myelin compartment in which the average frequency offset is positive (Figure 5), with further variation at late echo times resulting from interference of signals from the axonal and external compartments. It is evident from Figure 4 that the genu and splenium display a more rapidly decaying magnitude signal than the central regions of the corpus callosum, and also show a greater change of frequency with TE. The three-pool model parameters shown in Figure 5 are generally in good agreement with those previously obtained by fitting a triple-exponential model to 7T data from the splenium of the corpus callosum [1] and the pool amplitudes are also in correspondence with values measured in the optic radiations at 3T [7] using a similar approach. Analysis of the variation of parameter values across the different regions of the corpus callosum shows that differences in the frequency of the myelin and axonal compartments are the strongest contributory factors to the measured difference in signal evolution in the genu and splenium compared with the central regions of the corpus callosum. These frequency offsets are sensitive to the fiber g-ratio and anisotropic susceptibility of myelin [3].

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Sati, P., et al., Micro-compartment specific T2* relaxation in the brain. NeuroImage, 2013. 77(0): p. 268-278.

2. van Gelderen, P., et al., Nonexponential T2* decay in white matter. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2012. 67(1): p. 110-117.

3. Wharton, S. and R. Bowtell, Fiber orientation-dependent white matter contrast in gradient echo MRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012. 109(45): p. 18559-18564.

4. Wharton, S. and R. Bowtell, Gradient echo based fiber orientation mapping using R2* and frequency difference measurements. NeuroImage, 2013. 83(0): p. 1011-1023.

5. Schweser, F., et al., Non-linear evolution of GRE phase as a means to investigate tissue microstructure. 19th Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med., 2011: p. 4527.

6. Aboitiz, F., et al., Fiber composition of the human corpus callosum. Brain Research, 1992. 598(1–2): p. 143-153.

7. Nam, Y., et al., Improved estimation of myelin water fraction using complex model fitting. NeuroImage, 2015. 116: p. 214-221.

Figures

Figure 1: Sagittal T1-weighted PSIR image indicating division of the corpus callosum into 5 regions (genu, anterior body, middle body, posterior body and splenium).

Figure 2: Development of frequency difference maps over a single subject undergoing a single slice sagittal scan over the midline of the corpus callosum (parameters outlined in methods section). 19 echo difference times (TE=2.4-45.6ms). .

Figure 3: Frequency difference maps in a sagittal slice at the mid-line at TE=12ms for 10 subjects . The corpus callosum is hypointense compared with the surrounding tissue, along with other white matter structures, such as the superior cerebellar peduncle in which fibres run perpendicular to B0. Blood vessels appear hyperintense.

Figure 4: Average magnitude and frequency difference signals for 60 scans from 10 subjects over 5 ROI in the corpus callosum. Error bars represent the standard error of the mean.

Figure 5: Results from fitting of triple-exponential model to magnitude and frequency difference data over 60 scans from 10 subjects. T2* values are shown in s and f values in Hz. The orange line represents the average standard error per subject and the blue line represents the standard deviation between subjects. fe set to 0 to calculate relative frequency offsets to the external pool.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2985