Samir D. Sharma1, Timothy J. Colgan1, Camilo A. Campo1, Tilman Schubert1, Utaroh Motosugi2, Diego Hernando1, and Scott B. Reeder1,3
1Radiology, University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 2Radiology, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan, 3Medical Physics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States
Synopsis
Ferumoxytol is an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) agent
that is taken up by the reticuloendothelial system where
it accumulates in organs such as the liver, spleen, and bone marrow. Given the
superparamagnetic properties of ferumoxytol, it may be possible for
quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) techniques to detect and quantify the
concentration of ferumoxytol in these organs. Recent technical developments have
demonstrated the feasibility of a QSM technique for magnetic susceptibility
mapping of the abdomen. Thus, the purpose of this work was to
test the feasibility of QSM to assess the longitudinal changes of ferumoxytol
in the liver and spleen.Purpose
Ferumoxytol
is an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) agent that has recently
been explored as a blood pool contrast agent for contrast-enhanced MRI and MR
angiography (MRA) of patients with renal failure
1,2. Further, approximately
24 hours after injection, ferumoxytol is taken up by the reticuloendothelial
system where it accumulates in organs such as the liver, spleen, and bone
marrow. Given the superparamagnetic properties of ferumoxytol, it may be
possible for quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) techniques to detect and
quantify the concentration of ferumoxytol in these organs. Recent technical
developments have demonstrated the feasibility of a QSM technique for magnetic
susceptibility mapping of the abdomen
3. This technique may be
further expanded to assess ferumoxytol accumulation in the abdomen. Thus,
the
purpose of this work was to test the feasibility of QSM to assess the
longitudinal changes of ferumoxytol in the liver and spleen.Methods
Subject Recruitment: Five healthy subjects were recruited for this
study after receiving IRB approval. The subjects were scanned during six
separate visits: immediately before ferumoxytol injection, followed by 1, 2, 4,
7, and 30 days after injection.
Data Acquisition: Experiments were
conducted on a 3T clinical MRI system (GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI). During
each visit, the subjects were placed in the supine position and scanned using a
32-channel phased-array torso coil. Data were acquired using a 3D multi-echo,
spoiled gradient-echo acquisition, with TE1 = 1.2 ms, ΔTE = 1.0 ms, number of
echoes = 6, flip angle = 4°, and scan plane = axial. Full coverage of the liver
and spleen was acquired in one breath-held scan of ~20 seconds.
Signal
Model: The acquired complex-valued source images were modeled as a function of
the water (ρw) and fat (ρf) components with known multi-peak fat spectrum (cn),
the R2* map, and the B0 field map (ψ), in the presence of additive white
Gaussian noise (Eq. 1).
$$s(TE_n) = (\rho_w+c_n\rho_f)e^{j2\pi \psi TE_n}e^{-R2^*TE_n}+N(0,\sigma^2)$$ QSM Reconstruction: The source images were processed offline in Matlab
(The Mathworks, Natick, MA). The water and fat images as well as the R2* map
and B0 field map were estimated from the complex-valued data using a nonlinear
least squares fit. The B0 field map was further processed using a joint
background field removal and dipole inversion QSM technique3 to generate the
magnetic susceptibility map (χ) (Eq. 2).
$$\min_\chi ||(WL\psi - WLD\chi )||^2_2+\lambda||WCG\chi||^2_2$$
In Eq. 2, W is the data weighting matrix, L is a Laplacian
operator for background field removal, D is the dipole response kernel, G is
the 3D gradient operator, and C denotes both the edge and fat constraints to
regularize the ill-posed inverse problem3. Because QSM yields estimates of
relative susceptibility, the estimated susceptibility map was shifted such that
the subcutaneous adipose tissue was -8.44 ppm4. The reconstructed
susceptibility maps were converted to DICOM format and then imported into OsiriX
(Pixmeo SARL, Bernex, Switzerland). Co-localized susceptibility and R2*
measurements were made in the liver and spleen using ROIs drawn in OsiriX. Note
that the magnetization of USPIOs does not scale linearly with field strength,
as is commonly assumed in QSM. Therefore, the estimated χ of the ferumoxytol is
not the true magnetic susceptibility, however it is directly related to the
magnetization for a given field strength. For notational convenience with
respect to QSM, we will use the term χ and refer to it as the “effective
susceptibility”.
Results
Figure 1 shows estimated effective susceptibility and R2* maps for one subject
for each of the six visits. Susceptibility changes in the liver and spleen were
observed, reflecting the accumulation and clearance of iron over time. For this
subject, iron accumulation peaked during Visit 3. For all subjects, susceptibility
measurements demonstrate accumulation of iron in the liver and spleen followed
by a clearance over time (Figure 2). Over all subjects and visits, susceptibility
measurements correlated well with R2* measurements (Figure 3). Linear
regression analysis yielded the following results for the liver: slope = 0.0021,
y-intercept = -8.63, R
2 = 0.675, and for the spleen: slope = 0.0024,
y-intercept = -8.81, R
2 = 0.937.
Discussion & Conclusion
We have demonstrated the feasibility of a QSM technique for assessing
the longitudinal changes of ferumoxytol in the body. Susceptibility changes
over time were observed in both the liver and spleen, reflecting the
accumulation and subsequent clearance of iron in those organs. QSM measurements
correlated well with R2* measurements. Ongoing work will focus on absolute
quantification of ferumoxytol concentration as well as assessment of
ferumoxytol accumulation in other organs including the bone marrow and lymph
nodes.
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the support of the NIH (UL1TR00427, R01
DK083380, R01 DK088925, R01 DK100651, and K24 DK102595) and Radiology R&D. We
also thank GE Healthcare for their support.References
1Bashir et al. JMRI 2014;42:884-898.
2Li et
al. JMRI 2005;21:46-52.
3Sharma
et al. MRM 2015;74:673-683.
4Szczepaniak et al. MRM 2002;47:607-610.