Synopsis
DCE-MRI, IVIM and DKI are emerging as
promising tools for tumor diagnositic or therapy-predictive purposes. We
performed these three methods in patients with rectal cancer simultaneously to
find out their correlations. Our results showed significant correlation between
perfusion sensitive parameters of IVIM and DCE-MRI. In addition, DKI parameters
were calculated from data with a low (0-1000) and high (200-2000) b-value range,
and the parameters from low b-value range showed significant correlation with
IVIM parameters, but not for the high b-value range. Purpose
To
find out the correlations between the various parameters derived from dynamic
contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI), diffusion imaging using
intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in
patients with rectal cancer.
Methods
Thirty-seven newly
diagnosed rectal cancer patients were prospectively
enrolled and scanned on a 3T MR scanner (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany)
using a prototype diffusion sequence. Diffusion weighted images were acquired
with 16 b-values 0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, 80, 100, 150, 200,
400, 600, 1000, 1500, and 2000 s/mm
2). DCE-MRI was performed in a
total of 75 dynamic phases with a 4.25s phase interval. An in-house developed
software based on MATLAB were used for both IVIM and DKI post-processing. The
IVIM parameters including perfusion fraction (
f), the pseudo-diffusion coefficient (D*) and true diffusion coefficient(D-IVIM) were calculated with a b values range of
0-1000 s/mm
2. DKI parameters, kurtosis(K)
and apparent diffusion coefficient(D-DKI), were
calculated using data from two b-value ranges 0-1000 and
200-2000 s/mm
2 respectively, denoted as K
1000, D-DKI
1000
and K
2000, D-DKI
2000. DCE-MRI parameters including
transfer constant (K
trans), rate constant of back flux (K
ep)
and extravascular extracellular space fractional volume (V
e) were
calculated using Toft’s modeling on Siemens workstation. Correlations between
IVIM, DKI and DCE-MRI parameters were analyzed respectively using Pearson's
correlation coefficients.
Results
The correlation analysis showed that perfusion-sensitive
parameters
f and D* from IVIM were significantly
correlated with DCE-MRI-derived parameter K
trans (r=0.510,
p=0.001; r=0.352, p=0.033). DKI parameters showed no significant correlation
with DCE-MRI parameters, while significant correlations were found between DKI
and IVIM parameters. K
1000 and D-DKI
1000 showed
significant correlation with D* (r=0.431, p=0.008) and
f (r=0.004, p=0.468) respectively, K
2000 showed weak correlation with
f (r=0.332,
p=0.045), see Figure 2.
Discussion
Personalized
treatment required functional MR imaging methods in addition to conventional
morphologic MRI. In rectal caner, to predict or monitor individual response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has
become the main concern. Hence, multi-parametric MRI including DCE-MRI and DWI
has emerged. Previous studies reported that: 1) Ktrans derived
from DCE-MRI was correlated with CRT treatment response or complete pathologic
response (pCR) 1,2; 2) In conventional DWI, relationship between ADC
and treatment response are still controversial 3-6. However, IVIM is
able to not only get more precise diffusion coefficient, but also get perfusion
parameter without contrast injection. IVIM was reported to be related with
perfusion MR in several tumors 7-9; 3) DKI could be more sensitive
than conventional DWI for cancer detection and evaluation 10. Therefore,
we designed this study to give a comprehensive understanding about
these multi-parametric MRI in rectal cancer.
Our
results showed that IVIM perfusion sensitive parameters was significantly correlated
with Ktrans derived from DCE-MRI, which suggested IVIM could be used
to reflect rectal cancer’s microvascular perfusion. DKI parameters of b-value range
0-1000 showed significant correlation with IVIM, which reflected non-gaussian
property due to combination of perfusion and diffusion signals. While DKI parameters
of b 0-2000 showed weak or no correlation with DCE-MRI and IVIM, which reflected
non-gaussion property not from conventional diffusion and perfusion, but might due
to restricted diffusion of cancer tissue, and could probablely provide
additional information.
Conclusion
IVIM perfusion sensitive parameters showed significant
correlations with DCE-MRI, which has great potential in tumor diagnosis and therapy
monitoring of rectal cancer. DKI parameter at high b-value range may provide addition
diffusion information other than conventional diffusion and perfusion. The correlation
of DCE-MRI, IVIM and DKI with histology and immunohistochemistry
will be conducted in future study.
Acknowledgements
This research is supported by Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China (No. 2014A020212126 ).References
1. Gollub MJ, Gultekin DH, Akin O, et al.
Dynamic contrast enhanced-MRI for the detection of pathological complete
response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur
Radiol. 2012;22(4): 821-831.
2. Lim JS, Kim D, Baek SE, et al. Perfusion
MRI for the prediction of treatment response after preoperative
chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer. Eur Radiol. 2012;22(8):
1693-1700.
3. Dzik-Jurasz A,
Domenig C, George M, et al. Diffusion MRI for
prediction of response of rectal cancer to chemoradiation. Lancet. 2002;360(9329):
307-308.
4. Sun YS, Zhang XP, Tang L, et al. Locally
advanced rectal carcinoma treated with preoperative chemotherapy and radiation
therapy: preliminary analysis of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for early detection
of tumor histopathologic downstaging. Radiology. 2010;254(1): 170-178.
5. Elmi A, Hedgire SS, Covarrubias D, et
al. Apparent diffusion coefficient as a non-invasive predictor of treatment
response and recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(10):
e524-531.
6. Monguzzi L, Ippolito
D, Bernasconi DP, et al. Locally advanced rectal cancer: value of ADC mapping
in prediction of tumor response to radiochemotherapy. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82(2):
234-240.
7. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, et
al. Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR
imaging. Radiology. 1988;168(2): 497-505.
8. Jia QJ, Zhang SX, Chen WB, et al. Initial
experience of correlating parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion and
dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T in nasopharyngeal
carcinoma. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(12): 3076-3087.
9. Lee EY, Hui ES, Chan KK, et al. Relationship
between intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MRI and dynamic
contrast-enhanced MRI in tissue perfusion of cervical cancers. J Magn Reson
Imaging. 2015;42(2): 454-459.
10. Sun K, Chen X, Chai W, et al. Breast
Cancer: Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging-Diagnostic Accuracy and Correlation with
Clinical-Pathologic Factors. Radiology. 2015;277(1): 46-55.