Yasuhiro Fujiwara1, Hirotoshi Maruyama2, Nobuyuki Kosaka3, Yoshiyuki Ishimori4, and Noriyuki Furukawa2
1Department of Medical Imaging, Faculty of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan, 2Radiological Center, National Hospital Organization Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan, 3Department of Radiology, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan, 4Department of Radiological Sciences, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan
Synopsis
We applied 3D phase-sensitive
inversion recovery (PSIR) sequence to liver MR imaging. Experiments with
phantom and healthy subjects revealed that this sequence improved contrast
enhancements of Gd-based agents and liver-to-spleen or muscle contrasts while
simultaneously providing an accurate T1 map of the liver. Better Gd contrast
enhancements and liver contrasts may improve tumor-to-liver contrasts in the hepato-biliary phase with
Gd-based hepatocyte-specific contrast agents, and the accurate T1 map may be
useful for liver-function assessments. Although a clinical study is required to
evaluate its utility, this sequence
may have potential to improve liver MR imaging.
INTRODUCTION
Gadolinium-based
hepatocyte-specific contrast agents have been widely used in liver imaging to
detect liver tumors in clinics. However, tumor-to-liver contrasts are low in
the case of chronic liver disease because contrast agents accumulate less to
hepatocytes [1]. In this study, we applied 3D phase-sensitive inversion recovery
(PSIR) sequence to liver imaging because this sequence is expected to improve
tumor-to-liver contrasts. Moreover, this sequence can simultaneously provide a T1
map of the liver without any additional scan, which has been recently reported
to be useful for liver-function assessments [2]. The purpose of this study was
to determine whether the PSIR sequence can improve contrast enhancements of
Gd-based agents and liver contrast while simultaneously providing an accurate
T1 map of liver parenchyma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Phantom study
The segmented
3D PSIR sequence was performed with a 3.0T clinical MRI system using an IR TFE readout and centric k-space
reordering [3]. Thirteen phantom tubes containing a mixture of 1.0% agarose solution and different concentrations of Gd contrast agents
were used. To determine the optimal
TI for PSIR, the phantom tubes were imaged by PSIR with four different TIs (300, 400, 500, and 600 ms), and then the contrast of each phantom
was calculated in the comparison to those of a control phantom with a T1 value of 764 ms, which is the same as in a liver tumor. These phantoms
were also imaged by conventional
TFE with FA = 15° and 30° for comparison with PSIR. For simultaneous T1 calculation
by PSIR, we used two
time-point images acquired from IR prepared image data and reference data with FA = 10°.
From the relationships between two IR magnetization evolutions, the fully
relaxed magnetization and T1 value were estimated using the iterative process
reported by Warntjes MJB et al. [4]. Finally, these T1 values
determined by PSIR were validated with two conventional T1 calculation methods:
the standard IR-SE (10 points) and look-locker methods (L-L).
In vivo study
Seven healthy volunteers (mean age: 29.6 years) participated in this
study. T1-weighted images were obtained using PSIR with optimal TI and conventional TFE (FA = 15° and 30°), and
regions of interest were drawn over the liver, spleen, and muscle in each image.
Liver-to-spleen and liver-to-muscle contrast were calculated and compared with each
sequence. For validating the simultaneous T1 calculation by PSIR, T1 values of
liver parenchyma, spleen, and muscle were compared with those obtained with the
look-locker method.
RESULTS
PSIR showed a higher contrast of Gd-containing
phantoms than those of conventional TFE (Fig. 1). The estimated T1 values measured by PSIR in each TI setting were linearly correlated with
those
measured by IR-SE. However,
shorter TI values (300
and 400 ms) showed
higher gradients in the range
of longer T1 values (Fig. 2a); thus,
the optimal TI for
PSIR was determined as 500 ms. The
estimated R1 (= 1/T1) of the phantom measured
by PSIR were also well
correlated with those measured by IR-SE and L-L (Fig. 2b). In the
in
vivo study, PSIR demonstrated significantly higher liver-to-spleen and liver-to-muscle contrast
than those of TFE with FA = 15° and
30° (PSIR:
1.16 ± 0.14, TEF with FA = 15: 0.30 ± 0.12, TFE with FA = 30: 0.44 ± 0.23 for
liver-to-spleen contrast, and
PSIR: 1.30 ± 0.26, TEF with FA = 15: 0.22 ± 0.03, TFE with FA = 30: 0.22 ± 0.05 for
liver-to-muscle contrast)
(Fig. 3). The representative
images of each sequence are shown in Figure 4. The estimated
T1 values of
liver parenchyma, spleen, and muscle
in
each subject measured by PSIR were clearly
correlated with those measured by L-L (Fig. 5).
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
The PSIR sequence
improved contrast enhancements of Gd-based agents and liver-to-spleen or muscle
contrasts while simultaneously providing an accurate T1 map of liver
parenchyma. Although a clinical study is required to evaluate its clinical
utility, this sequence may have potential to improve liver MR imaging.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Tamada T,
et al. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;37:1093-1099.
2. Katsube T,
et al. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:277-283.
3. Kellman P, et
al. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:372-383.
4. Warntjes
MJB, et al. BMC Med Imaging. 2010;10:19.