Takashi Iwanaga1, Yoshihiko Fukukura2, Tomonori Saito1, Masashi Sasaki1, Yuichi Kumagae2, Koji Takumi2, Takuro Fujisaki1, and Takashi Yoshiura2
1Department of Radiological Technology, Kagoshima University Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan, 2Department of Radiology, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Kagoshima, Japan
Synopsis
When liver MRI is performed using Gd-EOB-DTPA,
DWI is often obtained after Gd-EOB-DTPA injection to shorten examination time
in the busy clinical practice. We compared malignant tumor conspicuity on low
b-value DWI after contrast between chemical shift selective (CHESS) and short
inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) sequences. Malignant liver tumors were
more conspicuous with STIR than
with CHESS. DWI with STIR is useful for visualizing malignant liver tumors after
Gd-EOB-DTPA injection, thus decreasing overall scan time.Purpose
Gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic
acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced MRI has played a very important role in the diagnosis of liver tumors. Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is also used
for detection and characterization of liver tumors. DWI with a low b-value is effective in
suppressing vascular structures and provides a higher tumor-to-liver contrast
(1). When liver MRI is performed using Gd-EOB-DTPA, DWI is often obtained after Gd-EOB-DTPA injection to
shorten examination time in the busy clinical practice. To obtain
meaningful DWI, robust fat suppression is essential because chemical shift
artifacts associated with single-shot echo-planar imaging may interfere with
the detection of pathology. Two types of pulse fat-suppression techniques have
been widely used for DWI: chemical shift
selective (CHESS) and short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR)
sequences. However, there are no reports
regarding the comparison of between DWI with STIR (STIR low b DWI) and DWI with
CHESS (CHESS low b DWI) after Gd-EOB-DTPA injection for visualizing malignant liver tumors. Therefore,
the purpose of this study was to compare the conspicuity of malignant liver
tumors between STIR low b DWI and CHESS
low b DWI after administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA.
Methods
Forty-seven patients with histologically
confirmed 24 hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), 3 cholangiocarcinomas, and 20 metastases
underwent STIR and CHESS low
b DWIs at 20 min after Gd-EOB-DTPA injection. Both low
b DWIs were acquired by breath-hold single-shot echo-planar imaging using a
b-value of 50 s/mm2. A 5-mm section
thickness and an intersection gap of 0.5 mm were used to cover the liver. Inversion
time for STIR low b DWI was 180 ms, which was selected to null fat signals. The pulse sequence parameters of
both low b DWIs were as follows: repetition time,3500 ms; echo time, 40 ms;
flip angle, 90°; field of view, 350 mm; matrix, 168x256; number of excitations, 1; sensitivity
encoding acceleration factor, 2; and number of
slices, 30. Look-Locker sequences (single slice multiphase imaging using gradient-echo
sequence with inversion recovery pulse) were also obtained to calculate T1 relaxation times of the liver and subcutaneous fat at 20 min after
Gd-EOB-DTPA injection. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs
= [signal intensity of tumor – signal intensity of liver] / standard deviation of liver) were compared
between for tumors vs. the liver on STIR and CHESS low b DWIs by using a paired
Student’s t test. We also assessed the relationship between CNR and T1
relaxation time of the liver.
Results
CNR was significantly higher
on STIR low b
DWI (25.1±15.8) than on CHESS low b DWI (11.9±7.6) (P<0.001), regardless of the presence
of chronic liver disease. Forty
of 47 patients (85.1%) showed a higher CNR on STIR low b DWI, compared with CHESS low b DWI. There
was no significant difference in T1 relaxation time of the liver at 20 min
after administration
of Gd-EOB-DTPA between patients with higher CNRs on STIR low b DWIs and those on
CHESS low
b DWIs. However, the differences in T1 relaxation times between the liver and
fat were significantly shorter in patients with higher CNRs on STIR low b DWIs (81±48.2 ms) (P=0.036) than those on CHESS low b DWIs (123±36.9 ms).
Discussion
Malignant liver tumors were more conspicuous on STIR low b DWI than on CHESS low b DWI. It is reasonable to speculate that liver parenchyma with a shot T1
relaxation time from Gd-EOB-DTPA shows lower signal on STIR low b DWI in contrast to high
signal malignant liver tumors that do not take up the contrast (2,3).
Conclusion
Low b DWI with STIR is useful for visualizing malignant liver tumors after
Gd-EOB-DTPA injection.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Takahara T, Kwee
TC. Low b-value diffusion-weighted imaging: emerging applications in the body.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012; 35:1266-1273.
2. Muhler A, Clement
O, Vexler V, et al. Hepatobiliary enhancement with Gd-EOB-DTPA: comparison of
spin-echo and STIR imaging for detection of experimental liver metastases.
Radiology 1992; 184:207-213.
3. Brody JM, Schafer
L, Tung GA, et al. Conspicuity of liver hemangiomas: short tau inversion
recovery, T1, and T2 imaging with gadolinium ethoxybenzyl diethylenetriaminepentaacetic
acid. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005; 21:391-397.