Ho-Fung Chan1, Neil J. Stewart1, Juan Parra-Robles1, Guilhem J. Collier1, and Jim M. Wild1
1Academic Unit of Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Compressed sensing (CS) was implemented to reduce scan
time and facilitate acquisition of 3D multiple b-value 3He diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI data for whole
lung morphometry. A fully-sampled 3D DW-MRI dataset was retrospectively
undersampled using CS simulations to determine optimal k-space undersampling
patterns. Whole lung morphometry measurements derived from prospective 3-fold
undersampled 3D multiple b-value
DW-MRI were compared to 3D and 2D fully-sampled equivalents. Good agreement was
obtained between lung morphometry measurements indicating 3D multiple b-value 3He DW-MRI with CS can
provide reliable measurements of whole lung morphometry within a single
breath-hold. Purpose
Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) with hyperpolarised gases
has been shown to be sensitive to changes in lung microstructure [1,2]. Fitting
a fractional diffusion stretched exponential model to multiple
b-value
3He DW-MRI data can
provide a robust quantitative measure of mean alveolar dimension (
LmD) [3]. Previous 2D
3He
DW-MRI sequences allow acquisition of up to six slices and
b-values in a single breath-hold (~15s), but do not provide whole
lung coverage required for lung morphometry. 3D diffusion sequences with similar
slice thickness and
b-values would
require long breath-holds to obtain whole lung coverage. In this work,
compressed sensing (CS) [4] was implemented to reduce scan time and facilitate
3D multiple
b-value
3He
DW-MRI of the lung within a single breath-hold.
Methods
Fully-sampled 3D DW-MRI images of a healthy subject’s
lungs (M, 30y) were acquired on a GE HDx 1.5T MR scanner with 500mL of 3He
(~25% polarisation) in a 22s breath-hold. Imaging parameters: 3D SPGR, two b-values=0, 1.6 s/cm2, diffusion
time Δ=1.6ms, 96x78x24 matrix, FOV= 40x32.5x28.8 cm3, TE/TR=
4.2/5.7ms, flip angle=2°, bandwidth=±31.25
kHz. Pseudo-random under-sampled k-space patterns were generated for acceleration
factors (AF) of 2 to 5. These patterns were used to retrospectively undersample
the fully-sampled images, and a non-linear algorithm [4] was used for image
reconstruction. Reconstructions were optimised by minimising the mean absolute
error (MAE) between reconstructed and fully-sampled apparent diffusion
coefficient (ADC) maps (MAEADC). Optimal patterns for each AF were
selected and resulting MAE and mean ADC values were compared.
To enable quantitative lung morphometry, a prospective 3D
3He CS DW-MRI dataset was acquired with four b-values (0, 2.4, 4.8, 7.2 s/cm2) and AF=3 in a 15s breath-hold,
and compared to equivalent fully-sampled 2D multi-slice DW-MRI (same slice
thickness and b-values) and
fully-sampled 3D DW-MRI (b=0, 2.4
s/cm2) from the same healthy subject. ADC maps were calculated from
the first two b-values, whilst LmD was calculated from all
four b-values using the stretched
exponential model [3]. For further validation, an additional five healthy
volunteers and one COPD patient (FEV1=31.2% predicted) were each
imaged with 3D multiple b-value CS
DW-MRI, fully-sampled 2D and 3D DW-MRI.
Results and Discussion
The
MAE between 3D 3He magnitude (b=0)
lung images, reconstructed from optimal k-space patterns, and fully-sampled
images was found to increase with AF. However, reconstructed images showed no
visual artefacts and good preservation of main details. Some blurring of the
edges of the lungs was observed on magnitude images at higher AFs due to the
greater undersampling of high frequency components. ADC maps were generated
(from b=0 and 1.6 s/cm2 images)
for each AF and compared to those of the fully sampled dataset (Table 1). A
very small increase in mean ADC value with AF was observed, however the maximum
global increase in mean ADC (+1% for AF=3 & 5) remained within the range of
healthy lung values (~0.20±0.08 cm2/s) at b=1.6 s/cm2 [1,2]. The small increase in global ADC and
similar appearance of sample slice ADC maps and histograms (Figure 1) indicated
good preservation of quantitative information.
The mean global ADC and LmD values of the prospective 3D CS dataset were
0.191±0.054 cm2/s and 0.226±0.023 μm respectively (Table 2).
The CS-derived values were ~3% larger than their fully-sampled equivalents from
2D and 3D datasets. This mismatch was within the standard deviation of the global
values, and well below reported ADC values in emphysema lungs (~0.47±0.18 cm2/s)
[1,2]. The LmD value is consistent
with reported healthy human lung mean linear intercept values obtained from
histology [5].
Good agreement was obtained from a slice-by-slice
comparison between ADC and LmD
values derived from fully-sampled and CS datasets of the six healthy volunteers
and one COPD patient. Again, a small positive bias was observed in 3D
CS-derived ADC and LmD values
and is likely the result of the CS reconstruction process. These results
indicate that 3D multiple b-value
DW-MRI could be used clinically to assess pathological changes in the microstructure
of the whole lung in a single breath-hold. This potential is
demonstrated in Figure 2, which depicts images of a healthy and COPD subject
from 3D multiple b-value DW-MRI with
CS, and LmD values calculated across the entire lung reflect the
expected alveolar size of each subject [5].
Conclusions
We have demonstrated that it is feasible to acquire 3D
multiple
b-value
3He
DW-MRI images for whole lung morphometry in a single breath-hold using
compressed sensing. Good agreement was obtained between ADC and
LmD values derived from
prospective CS and fully-sampled datasets indicating that 3D DW-MRI with CS can
provide reliable measurements of whole lung morphometry.
Acknowledgements
This work was funded by the University of Sheffield, National Institute for Health Research, and Medical Research Council.References
[1] Saam, B. et
al. 2000. Magn Reson Med 44(2):174-179.
[2] Salerno, M. et al. 2002. Radiology 222(1):252-260.
[3] Parra-Robles, J. et al. 2014. Proc ISMRM:3529.
[4] Lustig, M. et al. 2007. Magn Reson Med 58(6):1182-1195.
[5] Woods, J. et al. 2006. Magn Reson
Med 56(6):1293-1300.