Yutaka Natsuaki1, Xiaoming Bi1, Gerhard Laub1, and David Grodzki2
1Siemens Healthcare, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany
Synopsis
With recent
developments in ultra-short TE (UTE) MRI sequences such as PETRA with the respiratory
triggering and the segmented acquisition, MRI has shown a potential of being a
viable radiation-free alternative to the incumbent gold standard CT lung
imaging. Within a volunteer validation
study (n=14), the current work demonstrates a recent progress in the PETRA lung
MRI towards its robustness and its applicability to all patient populations. The
proposed solution improves patient comfort and image contrast by suppressing
the unintended high intensity signals from surrounding tissues.Purpose
For clinical lung imaging that requires multiple
measurements over treatment duration, computed tomography (CT) has been the
modality of choice despite its concern with accumulating radiation
1. With recent developments in Ultra-short TE (UTE) MRI
sequences such as PETRA
2, lung MRI has shown a great potential of being a
viable alternative to the incumbent CT lung imaging. Not only being
radiation-free, the UTE MRI can further differentiate airway from lung
parenchyma
1, something that the CT cannot deliver. The current work demonstrates a recent progress
in the PETRA lung MRI that improves patient comfort and the image quality by
suppressing unintended signals from surrounding tissues.
Methods
The PETRA sequence
is a 3D radial projection (i.e. Kush ball) based UTE technique. Due to the MRI scanner hardware limitation with
transmit-receive (Tx/Rx) switching time (THW in Fig.1a), each
center-out radial projection will have a gap in the middle of the k-space
(Fig.1c). PETRA then fills in these
missing k-space data with separate Cartesian point-wise acquisitions (Fig.1b). Thus,
PETRA has no special requirements on Tx/Rx switching times and can be utilized
with any coil.
For the lung application, the current PETRA sequence utilizes external respiratory triggering with segmented acquisitions (Fig.2). Since the PETRA sequence operates with low flip angles (FA, typically 3-6 degrees), an effect from frequently breaking steady state with the respiratory triggering is negligible. Thus PETRA is compatible with respiratory triggering and with segmented acquisition.
PETRA is a 3D radial projection sequence with non-slice selective RF, and for the body application it will have unintended RF excitation of the surrounding tissues that can interfere with the intended target. Fig.3 demonstrates such case, where strong external signals from arms (Fig.3a) and chest wall fat (Fig.3b) interfere with overall image quality. The only way to completely avoid arms signal is to keep them away from the coils (e.g. arms up and away from the lung), which is uncomfortable and unrealistic for any imaging subjects. With a general patient population, we expect extra layers of chest wall with fat, and UTE contrast alone cannot suppress this. These external signals can be suppressed if we apply magnetization preparation pulses (e.g. slice-selective regional saturation (RSat) and non-selective fat saturation (FatSat)) to PETRA lung MRI. Since PETRA is compatible with triggered segmentation, we hypothesize that magnetization preparation pulses, too, are compatible (Fig.2). Each acquisition window has the same sets of magnetization preparation pulses repeatedly applied with fixed intervals, starting in-sync with the trigger event.
The sequence prototype was implemented on 3T scanners (MAGNETOM Skyra and Prisma, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The technique was validated with healthy volunteers (n=14) under a local IRB approved protocol. PETRA lung MRI data was acquired with the following protocol: FOV 360mm3, 80000 radial spokes; isotropic 0.9mm3; FA 6°; TR/TE 3.2/0.07 msec; BW 1860 Hz/pixel; 2 RSats and a FatSat per 25 TRs; total scan time ~10 min. The resulting lung MRI data sets were compared for overall image quality, delineation of air to lung tissues, and presence of artifacts.
Results
All scans and
reconstructions were performed successfully (ex./ Fig.s 3c, 3d, 4). Unintended high intensity signals from arms
(Fig.3c) and from chest wall fat (Fig.3d) were suppressed in the all
cases. Mid to upper lung structures were
depicted clearly without breathing motion blurs, with an excellent delineation
of air to lung tissues. However, unlike the
Fig.4 example, liver dome in 9 out of 14 cases were blurred, and this further
propagated to the neighboring tissues, in particular with mid to lower lung
structures.
Discussion
The proposed
lung MRI solution is limited by the respiratory motion. If the subject breathes consistently for the
entire acquisition time (e.g. Fig.4 on lower right), the current solution delivers
blur-free, high quality lung images that rival the CT. However, it is unreasonable to expect this
from every patient population. Improvements
in both sequence efficiency (e.g. MRI acceleration with Phyllotaxis sparse sampling
and iterative reconstruction
3) and motion compensation (e.g. 100% efficiency
self-gating & binning
4) must be considered to overcome the limitation.
Conclusion
With the latest
progress in the respiratory-triggered PETRA sequence, the lung MRI has continued
to show its immense potential of becoming the modality of choice for the lung
imaging. Further clinical testing and R&D
efforts, especially with sequence efficiency and motion compensation improvements,
are warranted.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Dournes G et al. Radiology 276(1):258-265(2015)
2. Grodzki et al. MRM 67(2):510-518 (2012)
3. Piccini et al. MRM 66:1049–1056
(2011)
4. Pang J, et al. MRM 71:67-74 (2013)