T1D-w ihMT:  Dipolar Relaxation time weighted imaging using inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer
Guillaume Duhamel1, Valentin H Prevost1, Gopal Varma2, David C Alsop2, and Olivier M Girard1

1CRMBM / CNRS 7339, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France, 2Radiology, Division of MR Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States

Synopsis

The inclusion of a dipolar reservoir in the existing two pool model for MT allowed interpreting the inhomogeneous MT (ihMT) signal as a dipolar order effect -characterized by a relaxation time T1D - within motion restricted molecules. In this study, we demonstrate that an ihMT signal can actually be evidenced in any component with non-trivial T1D value. Adjustment of the dual frequency irradiation efficiency by increase of Δt, the repetition rate of consecutive saturation pulses, filters the signal of shorter T1D components. This provides a means to realize T1D-weighted imaging, a new source of MR contrast between tissues.

Purpose

To use inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer (ihMT) to realize dipolar relaxation time (T1D) weighted imaging, a new MR contrast.

Introduction

The inclusion of a dipolar reservoir in the existing two pool model for MT allowed interpreting the inhomogeneous MT (ihMT) signal as a dipolar order effect - characterized by a relaxation time T1D - within motion restricted molecules1. Comparing saturation of dual frequency irradiation (MT+- image), with the less efficient saturation of single frequency irradiation (MT+ image) allowed revealing dipolar order effect in tissues that have a nonzero T1D. The large fraction of the semi-solid, bound magnetization with long T1D values was responsible for the higher ihMT signal obtained in myelinated structures1 and hence for the apparent specificity of ihMT for myelin2,3. In this study, we demonstrate that an ihMT signal can actually be evidenced in any component with non-trivial T1D value. Adjustment of the dual frequency irradiation efficiency by increase of Δt, the repetition rate of consecutive pulses, filters the signal of shorter T1D components. This provides a means to realize T1D-weighted imaging, a new source of MR contrast between tissues.

Materials and Methods

IhMT experiments were performed at 11.75T (vertical MR system, Bruker, AV 500WB, transmit/receive volume coil: ∅ 2cm, length 3cm) on hair conditioner (containing lamellar liquid crystal structures4, LLC), agarose (agar 2% and 4%), and in vivo, on mouse (n=4, temperature 37±1°C). A 2D single-slice single-shot RARE sequence (TR/TE=3.4s/1.82ms, slice thickness=1mm, FOV=25x25 mm and mtx=64x64) combined with a pulsed ihMT preparation3 was used. Single frequency irradiation (Fig. 1a) was realized with a long train of Hann-shaped RF pulses (length, PW, frequency f=+8kHz for MT+ image, f=-8kHz for MT- image), repeated every Δt for a total saturation time τ, overall depositing a total energy of saturation ETR. Pulsed-dual frequency irradiation (MT+- image) at identical ETR value and achieved by alternating the frequency offset every other pulse from +8kHz to –8kHz (Fig. 1b) was used for LLC, agar and mouse experiments. Additionally, a strategy using cosine-modulated Hann-shape pulses for dual-frequency irradiation (Fig. 1c) was also tested in vivo. Values of saturation parameters are reported in table 1. IhMTR values, defined as the ihMT signal (MT++MT--2MT+-) divided by the unsaturated M0 image, were measured in LLC, agar and in brain internal capsule white matter (IC), cortical gray matter (GM) and muscle area (Mu). The contrast between IC and GM and between IC and Mu was evaluated by measuring the ratio of their ihMTR values.

Results

Different intensities of ihMTR and changes with Δt were obtained in LLC (T1DLLC~270ms, measured using the model developed in (1)) and agar2% (T1Dagar2%~2.3ms) and 4% (T1Dagar4%~2.6ms) (Fig. 2). High ihMTR values in LLC (ihMTRLLC=31.5%, Δt=1.3ms) were only little affected by Δt increase (ihMTRLLC=28.5%, Δt=6.3ms), whereas low agar ihMTR values obtained for Δt=1.3ms (ihMTRagar2%=1.25%, ihMTRagar4%=1.85%) were divided by almost two for Δt=3.3ms (ihMTRagar2%=0.65%, ihMTRagar4%=0.95%) and tended toward zero for Δt=5.3ms (ihMTRagar2%<0.4%, ihMTRagar4%<0.6%). In vivo pulsed dual-saturation results show an increase of ihMTR with decreasing Δt in all structures. For instance, for Δt decreasing from 3.3ms to 1.3ms, the relative ihMT signal increase was similar in IC and GM (~+20%) due to close T1D values (T1DIC=5.9ms, T1DGM=5.2ms) and was greater in Mu (+55%, T1DMu=2.1ms). This resulted in a constant IC/GM contrast but a loss of IC/Mu contrast with decreasing Δt (Fig. 3, left, plots and images). Compared to pulsed-dual saturation, the use of cosine-modulated pulses allowed quasi-instantaneous dual saturation. This led to significant and Δt-independent increase of ihMTR values in all structures: +22% in IC (ihMTRIC~6% vs 4.8%), +30% in GM (ihMTRGM~3.5% vs 2.7%) and +65% in Mu (ihMTRMu~3% vs 1.8%). This signal increase was however accompanied by important loss of IC/Mu contrast (-60%) (Fig. 3 right, plots and images), consistent with minimal T1D-weighting.

Discussion

For pulsed-dual saturation, increasing Δt filters the ihMT signal of shorter T1D components (e.g. agar) with little effect on the signal of long T1D components (e.g. LLC). This filtering strategy allowed performing T1D-weighted imaging, which can be used in vivo to enhance the specificity of ihMT and reinforce its contrast for longer T1D tissue. Hence, ihMTR maps at Δt=3.3ms showed high specificity for WM (T1DMu<Δt<T1DWM) compared to that at Δt=1.3ms (Δt <T1DMu<T1DWM), however, at the cost of a slight decrease in sensitivity (ihMTRIC=4.7% for Δt=1.3ms vs 4.0% for Δt=3.3ms). Conversely, short T1D component (e.g. Mu) ihMT signal can be revealed using faster dual saturation approaches such as cosine-modulated pulses. This strategy could enable the study of ihMT in other tissues than brain.

Conclusion

T1D-weighted imaging, a new source of MR contrast between tissues, can be realized with ihMT.

Acknowledgements

Support from the A*MIDEX grant (n°ANR-11-IDEX-0001-02) funded by the French Government "Investissements d'Avenir" program

References

1. Varma G, et al. J. Magn. Reson. 2015;260:67–76.

2. Varma G, et al. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;73:614–622.

3. Girard OM, et al. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015;73:2111–2121

4. Malyarenko DI, et al. Magn. Reson. Med. 2014;72:1427–1434

Figures

Table 1: Parameters used for the different saturations of the ihMT preparation. Frequency offsets were f=±8 kHz.

Figure 1: ihMT preparation. Single offset saturation for MT+ (a), pulsed dual offset (b) and Cosine-Modulated dual offset (c) saturation for MT+-. Note that for identical RF power deposition, the cosine-modulated B1 peak is increased by a factor √2 compared to Hann-shape pulses B1 peak.

Figure 2: ihMTR as a function of Δt for LLC, agar 2% and 4%

Figure 3: ihMTR and contrast ratios measured in IC, GM and Mu as a function of Δt for pulsed dual saturation (left) and cosine-modulated dual saturation (right). Examples of ihMTR maps are shown at the bottom.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2909