Jiadi Xu1,2, kannie W. Y. Chan1,2, Xiang Xu2, Nibhay Yadav1,2, Guanshu Liu1,2, and Peter C. M. van Zijl1,2
1F. M. Kirby Center, Kennedy Kriger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
An on-resonance variable delay multi-pulse (onVDMP) scheme was developed
for separation and quantification of magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and total
fast-exchanging protons (TFP) contributions. Phantom studies of glucose, bovine
serum albumin (BSA) and hair conditioner show the capability of onVDMP to
separate out exchangeable protons with different exchange rates by their unique
signal buildup curves. Quantitative MTC and TFP maps acquired on healthy mouse
brains showed strong gray/white matter contrast for the slowly transferring MTC
protons while the TFP map was more uniform across the brain. PURPOSE
In
conventional quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) studies, the MTC pool is
usually assumed to be a single pool with slow exchange rate (1-2). However, a
diversity of proteins, lipids and metabolites are present in tissue. Assuming fast-exchanging
protons to be a part of the overall slow-exchanging MTC pool not only ignores existing
information about the molecular constituents of the semisolid matrix, but also
induces errors when estimating the pool size and exchange parameters for qMT. Here,
we propose an on-resonance variable delay multi-pulse (onVDMP) approach (3) to
separate slowly exchanging MTC and total fast-exchanging protons (FTP, from metabolites
+ some MTC from fast exchanging protons) by fixing the pulse number and varying
the mixing time, which is used as an exchange rate filter to separate these two
pools based to their unique characteristic buildup patterns as a function of
mixing time.
METHODS
The
basis of onVDMP is a label-transfer module (LTM) of a simple binomial pulse (pp)
followed by a mixing time (tmix) A train of LTMs was applied at the
water resonance (Fig. 1A) and tmix was varied to separate and
quantify MTC and FTP contributions. A binomial pulse can achieve high label
efficiency for both MTC (4) and fast-exchanging protons. The onVDMP curve as a
function of tmix is sensitive to the exchange rate of
slow-exchanging protons, but almost identical for exchange rates above 1 kHz
(Fig. 1B). In tissue, the slow-exchanging pool at high B1 mainly originates
from the conventional MTC. We describe the slowly transferring pool (slowMTC) with
a fraction xslowMTC and
exchange rate kslowMTC.
The pool of total fast-exchanging protons has concentration xTFP .
Since the saturation efficiencies and concentrations cannot be separated out
for the TFP pool, an αxTFP map will be calculated instead. The onVDMP
curves were fitted with three variable parameters (xslowMTC, kslowMTC,
αxTFP)
using a three-pool model (slowMTC, TFP and water pool).
Glucose
(Glc, 200 mM), cross-linked BSA (10%w/v) and hair conditioner (Suave) were
selected to represent metabolites and MTC pools arise from proteins and lipids
found in tissues. All MRI experiments were performed on a horizontal 11.7 T
Bruker Biospec system (Bruker, Germany). Images were acquired using a RARE
sequence with TR/TE= 8 s/ 4 ms, RARE factor= 8, slice thickness =1 mm, a matrix
size of 64 × 64. 32 binomial pulses (B1=93.6 μT; 2 ms pulse width) with ten mixing
times (0 to 150 ms ) were used for slowMTC and TFP quantification,
respectively.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Figure
2A illustrates a simulation of the observed CEST/MT signal when taking DS
(water Direct Saturation), slowMTC and TFP contributions into account. At zero
mixing time, the observed CEST/MTC signals originate mainly from the DS and TFP
pools. The contribution from the slowMTC pool increases with longer tmix,
while that of DS and FTP signals decreases with T1w. The time for
the MT signal of slowMTC pool to reach maximum is determined by the balance
between kslowMTC and
T1w. This observation was verified by the phantom studies shown in
Fig. 2B. The fraction xslowMTC and
the rate kslowMTC were extracted by fitting the onVDMP buildup
curves, and were found to be xslowMTC=10.7%
/ kslowMTC=50.6 Hz (cross-linked BSA) and xslowMTC=7.7%
/ kslowMTC=24.8 Hz (hair conditioner), respectively. αxTFP was determined for the Glc phantom. Due to a significant amount of
fast-exchanging protons in cross-linked BSA, the CEST/MTC signal at zero mixing
time is already around 60 %, while only a small amount of fast-exchanging
protons was found in hair conditioner.
The parametric maps of xslowMTC, kslowMTC and αxTFP maps in healthy mouse brain by fitting a
three-pool model to onVDMP data acquired using 32 binomial pulses are shown in
Figs. 3A-C, respectively. The xslowMTC and kslowMTC maps show similar contrast as
conventional qMT. The mixing time dependencies of signals from the cortex (cx)
and thalamus (th) (Fig. 3D) resemble the one obtained from cross-linked BSA.
The αxTFP map is presented in Fig. 3C, showing
uniform signal across the brain with an average value of 3.0%.
CONCLUSION
The onVDMP technique proposed provides a
simple and comprehensive way of separately mapping slow and fast-exchanging
protons in tissues. Besides the quantification of the exchange rate together
with macromolecule fraction, this technique can provide further information
about the metabolites in tissues.
Acknowledgements
Funding
Support:
NIH
R01EB019934, P50CA103175, R01EB015032, P41EB015909 and R21EB018934.References
1. Sled JG, Pike GB. JMR 2000;145:24.
2. Graham SJ, Henkelman RM.JMRI 1997;7:903.
3. Xu J, et. al. MRM 2014;71:1798.
4. Hu BS, et. al. MRM 1992;26:231.