On-resonance Variable Delay Multi Pulse Scheme for Imaging of Fast-exchanging Protons and semi-solid Macromolecules
Jiadi Xu1,2, kannie W. Y. Chan1,2, Xiang Xu2, Nibhay Yadav1,2, Guanshu Liu1,2, and Peter C. M. van Zijl1,2

1F. M. Kirby Center, Kennedy Kriger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States

Synopsis

An on-resonance variable delay multi-pulse (onVDMP) scheme was developed for separation and quantification of magnetization transfer contrast (MTC) and total fast-exchanging protons (TFP) contributions. Phantom studies of glucose, bovine serum albumin (BSA) and hair conditioner show the capability of onVDMP to separate out exchangeable protons with different exchange rates by their unique signal buildup curves. Quantitative MTC and TFP maps acquired on healthy mouse brains showed strong gray/white matter contrast for the slowly transferring MTC protons while the TFP map was more uniform across the brain.

PURPOSE

In conventional quantitative magnetization transfer (qMT) studies, the MTC pool is usually assumed to be a single pool with slow exchange rate (1-2). However, a diversity of proteins, lipids and metabolites are present in tissue. Assuming fast-exchanging protons to be a part of the overall slow-exchanging MTC pool not only ignores existing information about the molecular constituents of the semisolid matrix, but also induces errors when estimating the pool size and exchange parameters for qMT. Here, we propose an on-resonance variable delay multi-pulse (onVDMP) approach (3) to separate slowly exchanging MTC and total fast-exchanging protons (FTP, from metabolites + some MTC from fast exchanging protons) by fixing the pulse number and varying the mixing time, which is used as an exchange rate filter to separate these two pools based to their unique characteristic buildup patterns as a function of mixing time.

METHODS

The basis of onVDMP is a label-transfer module (LTM) of a simple binomial pulse (pp) followed by a mixing time (tmix) A train of LTMs was applied at the water resonance (Fig. 1A) and tmix was varied to separate and quantify MTC and FTP contributions. A binomial pulse can achieve high label efficiency for both MTC (4) and fast-exchanging protons. The onVDMP curve as a function of tmix is sensitive to the exchange rate of slow-exchanging protons, but almost identical for exchange rates above 1 kHz (Fig. 1B). In tissue, the slow-exchanging pool at high B1 mainly originates from the conventional MTC. We describe the slowly transferring pool (slowMTC) with a fraction xslowMTC and exchange rate kslowMTC. The pool of total fast-exchanging protons has concentration xTFP . Since the saturation efficiencies and concentrations cannot be separated out for the TFP pool, an αxTFP map will be calculated instead. The onVDMP curves were fitted with three variable parameters (xslowMTC, kslowMTC, αxTFP) using a three-pool model (slowMTC, TFP and water pool).

Glucose (Glc, 200 mM), cross-linked BSA (10%w/v) and hair conditioner (Suave) were selected to represent metabolites and MTC pools arise from proteins and lipids found in tissues. All MRI experiments were performed on a horizontal 11.7 T Bruker Biospec system (Bruker, Germany). Images were acquired using a RARE sequence with TR/TE= 8 s/ 4 ms, RARE factor= 8, slice thickness =1 mm, a matrix size of 64 × 64. 32 binomial pulses (B1=93.6 μT; 2 ms pulse width) with ten mixing times (0 to 150 ms ) were used for slowMTC and TFP quantification, respectively.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Figure 2A illustrates a simulation of the observed CEST/MT signal when taking DS (water Direct Saturation), slowMTC and TFP contributions into account. At zero mixing time, the observed CEST/MTC signals originate mainly from the DS and TFP pools. The contribution from the slowMTC pool increases with longer tmix, while that of DS and FTP signals decreases with T1w. The time for the MT signal of slowMTC pool to reach maximum is determined by the balance between kslowMTC and T1w. This observation was verified by the phantom studies shown in Fig. 2B. The fraction xslowMTC and the rate kslowMTC were extracted by fitting the onVDMP buildup curves, and were found to be xslowMTC=10.7% / kslowMTC=50.6 Hz (cross-linked BSA) and xslowMTC=7.7% / kslowMTC=24.8 Hz (hair conditioner), respectively. αxTFP was determined for the Glc phantom. Due to a significant amount of fast-exchanging protons in cross-linked BSA, the CEST/MTC signal at zero mixing time is already around 60 %, while only a small amount of fast-exchanging protons was found in hair conditioner.

The parametric maps of xslowMTC, kslowMTC and αxTFP maps in healthy mouse brain by fitting a three-pool model to onVDMP data acquired using 32 binomial pulses are shown in Figs. 3A-C, respectively. The xslowMTC and kslowMTC maps show similar contrast as conventional qMT. The mixing time dependencies of signals from the cortex (cx) and thalamus (th) (Fig. 3D) resemble the one obtained from cross-linked BSA. The αxTFP map is presented in Fig. 3C, showing uniform signal across the brain with an average value of 3.0%.

CONCLUSION

The onVDMP technique proposed provides a simple and comprehensive way of separately mapping slow and fast-exchanging protons in tissues. Besides the quantification of the exchange rate together with macromolecule fraction, this technique can provide further information about the metabolites in tissues.

Acknowledgements

Funding Support: NIH R01EB019934, P50CA103175, R01EB015032, P41EB015909 and R21EB018934.

References

1. Sled JG, Pike GB. JMR 2000;145:24. 2. Graham SJ, Henkelman RM.JMRI 1997;7:903. 3. Xu J, et. al. MRM 2014;71:1798. 4. Hu BS, et. al. MRM 1992;26:231.

Figures

Fig. 1. (A) On-resonance VDMP sequence with cycling of the pulses over four label transfer modules (LTMs) by ϕ1 = x y –x –y; ϕ2 = -x -y x y. Open rectangles represent hard pulses. (B) Simulation of the onVDMP buildup curves for different exchange rates. In the simulations, a series of 32 2-ms pulses with, B1 field of 93.6 μT was applied; An exchanging proton concentration of 20 mM and an offset of 2 ppm was used.

Fig. 2. (A) Simulation of the three contributions in the observed onVDMP buildup curves, and their typical patterns for onVDMP excitation: DS, slowMTC and TFP. (B) onVDMP buildup curves for hair conditioner, cross-linked BSA, Glc. The solid lines are the fitted curves using the 3-pool Bloch simulations.

Fig.3 xslowMTC (A), kslowMTC(B) and αxTFP maps (C) of mouse brain calculated from the VDMP buildup curves resulting from 32 binomial pulses (2ms, 93.6 µT) and fitted using a three-pool model. (D) The corresponding onVDMP buildup curves of cortex (cx), and thalamus (th) together with fitted curves. From the fitting, xslowMTC=11% (cx) / 14.7% (th), kslowMTC=24.5 Hz (cx)/ 24.5 Hz (th) and αxTFP=3 % (cx)/ 3 % (th) were found.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2891