Increasing the inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT) signal in vivo with high amplitude, low duty cycle irradiation
Gopal Varma1, Olivier M Girard2, Valentin H Prevost2, Guillaume Duhamel2, and David C Alsop1

1Radiology, Division of MR Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 2CRMBM-CEMEREM UMR 7339, CNRS-AMU, Aix Marseille Université, Marseille, France

Synopsis

High power, off-resonance irradiation as utilized in ihMT/MT can saturate pools of bound magnetization before they exchange in tissues. Observation of such saturation phenomena is limited by power constraints in-vivo and by attenuation of the free pool magnetization. A technique for studying and enhancing saturation effects using relatively short bursts of higher power irradiation is evaluated. The results provided 2-5 fold increases in ihMTR (depending on average power and offset frequency). Such short duration, high power pulses offer a new window to probe exchange kinetics and dipolar order effects, as well as enhancing the quality and feasibility of ihMT imaging.

Purpose

To investigate the use of concentrated (lower duty cycle) high power pulses during saturation preparation to achieve an increase of the inhomogeneous magnetization transfer (ihMT) signal in vivo.

Introduction

ihMT imaging [1-2] shows promise for characterization of myelinated tissues but the signal difference it measures is relatively small, especially at powers achievable in humans. ihMT and MT typically employ RF irradiation spread out over time with duty cycles of 50% or more. In this work, the effect of changing the duty cycle of the RF irradiation on the ihMT signal is explored. This change is compared by taking an initial 50% duty cycle, i.e. distributed case, and, for the same average power over the saturation period, the concentrated case of less frequent, higher B1 pulses.

Methods

The experiments required for ihMT data (i.e. saturation at single, and dual offset frequencies) were conducted on 3 healthy volunteers using a GE 3T scanner and 8-channel head coil. RF preparation was achieved with 5ms pulses (cosine modulated for dual offset frequency irradiation) for a saturation duration of 2s, prior to single shot spin echo EPI (FOV=25x25cm2; matrix=128x128; slice=6mm; TE/TR=24ms/5s). For the distributed case, the 5ms pulses were initially applied every 10ms for a 50% duty cycle (Fig.1a). The effect of duty cycle, absolute offset frequency, |Δ| and B1,RMS (over the saturation duration) was explored. The duty cycle was reduced by increasing the space between pulses whilst maintaining B1,RMS (Fig.1b). The effect of a reduced duty cycle of 5% on the ihMT ratio (ihMTR) was examined for a range of |Δ| and B1,RMS values. Also calculated was the MT ratio (MTR) difference between the saturated signals for duty cycles <50% and 50%, such that MTR difference = MTR(50% duty cycle) - MTR(<50% duty cycle).

Results

There were 2 to 5 fold increases in the ihMTR using the concentrated versus distributed preparation (i.e. data acquired at a lower duty cycle) from white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM) ROIs (Figs.2,3a-b). The ihMTR spectrum was similar in shape but somewhat changed by a concentrated preparation; ihMTR at higher frequency was amplified more by the concentrated irradiation than at lower |Δ|. Examining individual components of the calculated ihMTR, the MTR was greatly reduced for concentrated single frequency irradiation and substantially less so for the dual frequency concentrated case (Fig.4). Based on the MTR difference, the WM/GM ratio increased from 1.3±0.1 to 1.5±0.1 going from single frequency to dual frequency data, and for lower B1,RMS with a ratio of 1.8±0.4 at B1,RMS=15mG (Figs.3c-d).

Discussion

The ability to greatly increase the ihMT signal within safe power levels at 3T enhances the diagnostic and scientific potential of ihMT. Recent work on development of a model for the ihMT signal highlights its sensitivity to the dipolar relaxation time, T1D parameter [3]. Since dipolar order effects and T1D only affect single frequency irradiation, the greater reduction of concentrated single frequency irradiation suggests additional T1D sensitivity. The MTR difference between concentrated and distributed single frequency irradiation might also be considered as an alternative ihMT-like contrast when power constraints are severe, as at 7T. Indeed an example volunteer image of the ihMTR (5% duty cycle; B1,RMS=30mG) and MTR difference from data acquired at the lowest B1,RMS shows comparable contrast (Figs.3b,d).

Conclusions

Use of shorter duration, high power saturation pulses during preparation at equal B1,RMS (i.e. lower duty cycles) increased the ihMTR achievable and provided a means to reduce the average SAR. Further investigation is required to see how this effect relates to MT/ihMT related model parameters, such as the free and bound pool exchange rate, and the dipolar relaxation time, T1D.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank F. Kourtelidis for help with volunteer scans.

References

[1] Varma, et al. MRM 2015 73:614-22. [2] Girard et al. MRM 2015 73:2111-21. [3] Varma et al. JMR 2015 260:67-76.

Figures

Figure 1 Illustration of pulse arrangement for saturation preparation in ihMT/MT experiments for duty cycles of a) 50%, and b) 5%. Note the relative increase in the B1 amplitude of the pulses for a 5% duty cycle in order to maintain B1,RMS.

Figure 2 Plots of ihMTR as functions of: a) duty cycle; b) absolute frequency offset of off-resonance saturation |Δ|, and c) B1,RMS as calculated over the saturation preparation duration.

Figure 3 Example images of ihMT acquired with |Δ|=7kHz, B1,RMS=30mG, and a) 50%, b) 5% duty cycle. MT difference images following single frequency irradiation acquired with |Δ|=7kHz, and c) B1,RMS=30mG, d) B1,RMS=15mG. Note signal is apparent in the scalp of MT difference images, but decreases at lower B1,RMS (arrowheads).

Figure 4 Plots of MTR difference between normalized signals following <50% duty cycle preparation and 50% duty cycle preparation as functions of: a) duty cycle; b) absolute frequency offset of off-resonance saturation |Δ|, and c) B1,RMS as calculated over the saturation preparation duration.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2890