Synopsis
Quantification of liver iron concentration (LIC) is
critical for the diagnosis of patients with liver iron overload. LIC is
conventionally measured using R2/R2* mapping methods which have limited
accuracy and precision, partly due to the non-linear relation between
relaxation rate and iron concentration. Quantitative susceptibility mapping
(QSM) has been shown to be effective in quantifying cerebral iron deposition.
For LIC quantification using QSM, the challenges include dealing with air-tissue
interface in the abdomen in background field removal and solving the ill-posed
inverse problem. Here we show a method which uses the apparent susceptibility
of liver vessels for LIC quantification. Introduction
Quantification
of the liver iron concentration (LIC) is critical for the diagnosis for
patients with
β-thalassaemia, hereditary hemochromatosis, and sickle-cell
disease (1,2). It is also indispensable in monitoring
chelation therapies for patients undergoing blood transfusion (2). LIC is conventionally measured
using R
2/R
2* relaxation rate mapping methods (1,3). However, these methods have limited
accuracy and precision, partly due to the non-linear relation between
relaxation rate and iron concentration (4). Particularly, R
2* may fail completely
for measuring high iron overload (2). Quantitative susceptibility mapping
(QSM) is a method which extracts susceptibility from magnetic field variations (5). In the past, QSM has been shown to
be effective in quantifying cerebral iron deposition. However, there are a few challenges
using QSM for LIC quantification, including dealing with air-tissue interface
in the abdomen, background field removal and solving the ill-posed inverse
problem (4,6). In this abstract, we show a method
which uses the apparent susceptibility of the liver vessels to quantify iron
concentration of the liver tissue itself.
Methods
The field variation is essentially a function of the
local susceptibility differences. For an infinitely long cylinder, the field
variation is given as: ΔB(r)=½B
0(
χin-
χout)∙(a
2/r
2)∙sin
2θ∙cos2φ,
where
χin and
χout are the
susceptibilities inside and outside the cylinder, respectively (7). For a vessel in the liver, the
field variation is dependent on its apparent susceptibility (Δ
χ=
χin-
χout). For
patients with iron overload, the liver vessels can be considered as in vivo
probes which reflect the changes of susceptibility or iron concentration in the
liver tissue, assuming that the changes of susceptibility inside the vessels is
negligible compared to those outside. To prove the feasibility of this method,
in vivo data for 7 healthy controls and 4 patients were collected on a 3T
Siemens scanner, using a 3D double-echo sequence. Imaging parameters were: TE=5/10ms, TR=15ms, FA=15
o,
BW/pixel =427Hz/pixel, voxel size = 1.67x1.67x2 mm
3, matrix size =
192x144x16. The phase images from the first echo were used to generate
susceptibility maps. Binary masks for the liver region were generated manually,
and SHARP (8) was used to remove the background
phase in the liver. Susceptibility maps were created using the iterative SWIM
algorithm (9), with the geometries of the vessels
extracted from the magnitude images from the first echo. R
2* maps were
generated by fitting the magnitude images in both echoes to an exponential
decay curve. The apparent susceptibilities of the vessels and the R
2* values of
the liver tissue were measured.
Results
The healthy controls show the usual contrast for veins
being paramagnetic relative to the background tissue (liver in this case,
Figure 1.c). On the other hand, the
severe iron overload in the patient is reflected by the reduced intensity in
magnitude images (
Figure 1.e), the increased R
2* values (
Figure 1.h) and the reversed sign of
the phase of vessels in the liver (
Figure
1.f), compared those in the healthy control (
Figure 1.a, 1.d and
1.b).
This leads to negative apparent susceptibility of the vessels (
Figure 1.g). The apparent
susceptibilities measured in healthy controls and patients were correlated with
the measured R
2* in the liver tissue (
Figure
2). Specifically, higher LIC was associated with higher R
2* values of the
liver tissues and lower apparent susceptibilities (i.e., more diamagnetic in
nature) of the liver vessels.
Discussion and Conclusion
The main advantages of the proposed method include the
simplicity in data processing and the accuracy in quantifying susceptibility of
the vessels. It is assumed that the changes in susceptibility of the vessels is
negligible from healthy controls to patients. In fact, the actual
susceptibility of the vessels can be more accurately estimated by utilizing the
R
2* of the vessels. On the other hand, there are a few QSM studies which try to
estimate the susceptibility of the liver tissue directly (4,6). However, this requires accurate phase
unwrapping in not only the regions inside the liver but also the regions
outside. In that case, both phase unwrapping and background field removal may
fail due to low SNR and the multiple air-tissue interfaces in the abdomen,
preventing a reliable measurement of LIC. The iterative SWIM algorithm is the
ideal QSM algorithm for quantifying apparent susceptibility of vessels, since
the geometry of the vessels can be faithfully obtained from magnitude images. In
conclusion, this study demonstrated the feasibility of using apparent
susceptibility of liver vessels to estimate liver iron concentration. The
proposed method may provide reliable and automatic measurement of liver iron
concentration in the future and may be able to handle a more accurate
quantification of liver iron for higher iron concentrations.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the Canadian
Institutes of Health Research/Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada Synchrotron
Medical Imaging Team Grant under award number CIF 99472, and the National
Cancer Institute, NIH, through Grant Number R21CA184682. Its contents are
solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the
official views of the NIH.References
1. Wood JC, Enriquez C, Ghugre N, Tyzka JM, Carson S, Nelson MD,
et al. MRI R2 and R2* mapping accurately estimates hepatic iron concentration
in transfusion-dependent thalassemia and sickle cell disease patients. Blood.
2005;106(4):1460–5.
2. Hernando D, Levin YS, Sirlin CB,
Reeder SB. Quantification of liver iron with MRI: state of the art and
remaining challenges. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;40(5):1003–21.
3.
St Pierre TG, Clark PR,
Chua-anusorn W, Fleming AJ, Jeffrey GP, Olynyk JK, et al. Noninvasive
measurement and imaging of liver iron concentrations using proton magnetic
resonance. Blood. 2005;105(2):855–61.
4. Sharma SD, Hernando D, Horng DE,
Reeder SB. Quantitative susceptibility mapping in the abdomen as an imaging
biomarker of hepatic iron overload. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74(3):673-83.
5.
Haacke EM, Liu S, Buch S, Zheng W,
Wu D, Ye Y. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future
directions. Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;33(1):1–25.
6.
Dong J, Liu T, Chen F, Zhou D,
Dimov A, Raj A, et al. Simultaneous phase unwrapping and removal of chemical
shift (SPURS) using graph cuts: application in quantitative susceptibility
mapping. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(2):531–40.
7.
Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR,
Venkatesan R. Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Physical Principles and Sequence
Design. 1st ed. Wiley-Liss; 1999.
8.
Schweser F, Deistung A, Lehr BW,
Reichenbach JR. Quantitative imaging of intrinsic magnetic tissue properties
using MRI signal phase: An approach to in vivo brain iron metabolism?
NeuroImage. 2011;54(4):2789–807.
9.
Tang J, Liu S, Neelavalli J, Cheng
YCN, Buch S, Haacke EM. Improving susceptibility mapping using a
threshold-based K-space/image domain iterative reconstruction approach. Magn
Reson Med. 2013;69(5):1396–407.