Sanjeev Chawla1, Sumei Wang1, Gaurav Verma1, Aaron Skolnik1, Sulaiman Sheriff2, Katelyn M Reilly1, Lisa Desiderio1, Andrew Maudsley2, Steven Brem3, Katherine Peters4, Harish Poptani5, and Suyash Mohan1
1Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 2Radiology, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States, 3Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 4Neurology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States, 5Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Tumor treating fields (TTFields) are a novel antimitotic
treatment modality for treatment of patients with glioblastoma (GBM). To assess
response to TTFields, 4 GBM patients
underwent diffusion, perfusion and 3D-echo-planar spectroscopic imaging prior
to initiation of TTFields and at one and two month follow-up periods. A trend
towards increased MD and a decrease in FA and rCBVmax was noted in
most patients at 2-month relative to baseline indicating inhibited tumor growth
and vascularity. Cho/Cr values did not exhibit any trend probably due to heterogeneity
in response. These preliminary data indicate the potential of advanced MR
imaging in assessing response to TTFields.
Introduction
Despite
advances in the multimodality treatment strategies, the prognosis of patients
with glioblastoma (GBM) remains poor with a median survival of only 12-15 months
for newly diagnosed GBM and 3-6 months for recurrent GBMs.
1 Recently,
2
tumor treating fields (TTFields), a new frontier in cancer therapy, have been
approved by FDA for the treatment of newly
diagnosed and recurrent GBMs. TTFields deliver low intensity, intermediate
frequency alternating electric fields directly to the brain inhibiting cell
division and causing neoplastic cell death with minimal effect on the quiescent
cells.
3 Due to its unique mechanism of action, this novel treatment
modality has shown promise in pilot clinical trials in patients with both
treatment naïve and recurrent GBMs.
4 Several studies have shown the
potential of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
5, perfusion weighted
imaging (PWI)
6 and proton MR spectroscopy
7 in evaluating
treatment response to different therapeutic regimens in patients with gliomas. However,
until now, no study has investigated the treatment response to TTFields in
gliomas using advanced MR imaging. The purpose of study was to monitor the
effects of TTFields in GBM patients using DTI, PWI and 3D-echoplanar
spectroscopic imaging (EPSI).
Methods
One patient with newly diagnosed GBM and 3 patients with recurrent GBM previously treated with standard of care
maximal safe resection and chemo-radiation therapy received TTFields (intensity~0.7V/cm
and frequency~200kHz). Patients underwent
baseline (prior to TTFields) and 2 follow-up (one and two months post initiation
of TTFields) MR imaging on a 3T MR system.
DTI data were acquired using 30 directions with a single-shot spin-echo
EPI with parallel imaging (acceleration factor=2), TR/TE=5000/86ms; NEX=3; in-plane
resolution=1.72 × 1.72mm
2, slice thickness=3mm, b= 0, 1000s/mm
2. After
motion and eddy current correction of raw DTI data, parametric maps (MD, FA)
were generated using in-house developed algorithm.
8 For PWI, T2*
weighted gradient-echo EPI sequence was acquired prior to and during the course
of a bolus of contrast agent using the following parameters: TR/TE = 2000/45ms,
in-plane resolution=1.72 × 1.72mm
2, 20 slices with thickness= 3 mm. Forty-five
sequential measurements were acquired for each section, with a temporal
resolution of 2.1 s. Leakage corrected CBV maps were constructed
using Nordic ICE program. Scan
parameters for 3D-EPSI were: TR/TE = 1550/17.6ms, spatial points=50×50×18,
voxel size=5.6×5.6×10mm
3. Water suppression using
frequency-selective saturation pulses and inversion-recovery nulling of lipid
signal (TI=198ms) was performed. EPSI acquisition also included an interleaved
water reference imaging to perform signal normalization, and eddy current
correction. EPSI data were processed offline using metabolic imaging and data
analysis system (MIDAS) package
.9 DTI, CBV maps and FLAIR images
were co-registered to post-contrast T1-weighted images and a semi-automated routine
8
was used to segment the contrast-enhancing region of tumor. Median values of
MD, FA, rCBV and Cho/Cr were computed at each time point. The 90
th
percentile rCBV (rCBV
max) values were also measured. Percent changes of each parameter between
baseline and follow-up time points were evaluated.
Results and Discussion
Clinically, all four patients were stable at 2 month follow-up. Percent
changes in MD, FA and rCBVmax from baseline to post TTFields at one
and two month follow-up periods are shown in
Fig 1. An increasing trend in MD accompanied by a steady decline in
FA was noted in most patients at the 2 month follow-up time point. The rCBVmax
was either stable or decreased in three patients and in one patient, it
initially increased at one-month and then stabilized at the 2 month time point.
The median Cho/Cr value did not demonstrate any specific trend as it decreased
in one and increased in another patient.
No
particular trend in the percent variation in volume from contrast enhancing
regions was observed.
In vitro3 studies in cell lines and
in vivo10 studies in cancer xenograft models have shown TTFields arrests neoplastic
cellular proliferation by disrupting normal polymerization-depolymerization
process of microtubules during mitosis. The inhibited cellular growth may
account for large increase in MD and decrease in FA as observed in the current
study. Reducing trends in rCBV
max at the follow-up may be associated
with reduced vascularity and tissue perfusion within the tumor bed after the
therapy. These changes occurred prior to significant changes in tumor volume,
which is typically used to assess response in these tumors, indicating the
potential value of DTI and PWI in assessing early treatment response to this
novel therapeutic paradigm. However, these early findings need to be corroborated
in a larger patient cohort.
Acknowledgements
The study was funded in part by a grant from the makers of the NovoTTF-100A system (Novocure
Ltd., Haifa, Israel).
References
1. Lacroix M,et al.J
Neurosurg 2001,95:190-8. 2.
Lacouture ME et al. Semin Oncol. 2014 ; 41 Suppl 4:S1-14. 3. Kirson ED et al.PNAS. 2007;104:10152–7.4. Stupp R,et al. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:2192–202.5. Saraswathy S et al. J Neurooncol
2009,91:69-81. 6. Nowosielski M et
al.Neuroradiology 2011.53:291-302. 7. Hattingen
E et al.Neuro Oncol 2011,13:1349-63. 8.
Wang S et al. Neuroimage.2009; 44:653-60.
9. Maudsley AA et al. NMR Biomed. 2006;19:492-503. 10. Kirson ED, BMC Med Phys 2009; 9:1.