Meng Lin1, Xiaoduo Yu1, Han Ouyang1, Dehong Luo1, Chunwu Zhou1, and Bing Wu2
1Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 2GE Healthcare MR research China, Beijing, Beijing, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
Tumor extent assessment of NPC is critical for delineating the
radio-therapeutic target region. We aimed to investigate the use of the fusion
images of fat
suppressed (FS)-T2 with arterial spin labeling (ASL)
in measuring the volume of NPC. Two observers measured the volume of 21
untreated NPC using FS-T2, FS-T2/ASL (with PLD=1.0, 1.5 and 2.0s) fusion images
and enhanced-T1WI separately. Compared to those obtained using FS-T2 alone,
measurements made using FS-T2/ASL were more consistent with those made using
enhanced-T1WI. The FS-T2/ASL fusion image has the potential to be an
alternative to enhanced-T1WI, when contrast administration can not be
performed.Purpose
Nasopharyngeal
carcinoma (NPC) is a type of malignant head and neck tumor. Imaging is needed
to assess the extent of the tumor for staging and delineating the target region
of radiotherapy. In MRI, contrast enhanced T1 has advantages in NPC diagnosis
and staging due to the improved contrast noise ratio between tumor and
surrounding tissue (such as fat and muscle)
1, it is also the only
MR examination recommended by national comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) for
NPC. However, contrast agent administration is associated with the danger of
allergy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). Arterial spin labeling (ASL) uses
RF labeled blood as bolus, and produces contrast free perfusion images.
However, ASL itself lacks necessary anatomical information for diagnosis as
compared to contrast enhanced T1. The fat suppressed (FS)-T2/ASL fusion image
overcomes this limitation. In this work, we investigate if FS-T2/ASL fusion
images may be a viable alternative to enhanced T1 when contrast administration
is not feasible.
Method
21
patients with untreated NPC confirmed by pathology received MRI before
nasopharyngoscope biopsy and treatment. MR scans were performed on a 3.0T whole
body scanner (GE Discovery 750) equipped with an 8-chanel head and neck coil. Consent
forms were obtained prior to the scans. Enhanced T1, fat suppressed T2 weighted
and ASL were performed with matching spatial coverage. In ASL, three post
labeling delays (PLD) of 1.0s, 1.5s and 2.0s were used. Fusion images of FS-T2/ASL
were performed using vendor supplied software based on the scan spatial
locations of each slices. The tumor regions based on different contrasts were
delineated manually by two experienced radiologists and their volumes were used
as the metric for assessing the consistency between FS-T2/ASL and enhanced T1. The
comparison of volume measurements included:1) the inter-series
correlation and consistency (ICC), which was the comparison between the
measurements made using enhanced
T1 and those made using FS-T2 alone and the FS-T2/ASL fusion images
respectively by same observer, 2) the inter-observers consistency, which was
the comparison between the measurements by the two observers based on the same
image contrast. Spearman correlation coefficients were performed to
determine the correlation. The consistency was evaluated using the Bland Altman
plots, which were made of the mean values against the difference values, with
the 95% limits of agreement calculated as the mean difference plus or minus
1.96 times the standard deviation of the difference.
Results
A
typical set of FS-T2, FS-T2/ASL and enhanced T1 images are shown in Fig.1.
It is seen that FS-T2 image (Fig.1a)
exhibit relatively poor delineation of the tumor region as compared to ASL (Fig.1b)
or enhanced T1 (Fig.1d) as arrowed. ASL image although delineates the
high perfusion regions well, the matching anatomical information is completely
missing. In comparison, FS-T2/ASL fusion images (Fig.1c) offers a much consistent description
to enhanced T1 image.
Statistically, the volumes
measured by two observers using enhanced T1 and those using FS-T2, FS-T2/ASL
(PLD of 1.0s, 1.5s, 2.0s) fusion images showed significant correlation. It is
seen that the correlation coefficients of FS-T2 /ASL (0.921 ~ 0.973) were
higher than those of FS-T2 alone based on both observers; and the correlation
coefficient of FS-T2 /ASL (PLD = 1.0s) from observer 1 was the highest (0.973)
while that of FS-T2 from observer 2 was the lowest (0.896) (Fig.2). The
superior performance of FS-T2/ASL (PLD = 1.0s) can also be seen in the
Bland-Altman plots, where the difference between measurements by FS-T2 and
enhanced T1, measurements by FS-T2/ASL and enhanced T1 are shown (Fig.3).
It is seen that by two observers the variations of the measurements of
FS-T2/ASL are much smaller than those of FS-T2 alone.
Discussion
and conclusion
ASL
is able to provide good contrast between tumor and non-tumor regions
2,
but lacks the necessary anatomical information of the lesions. FS-T2 alone has
difficulty in in defining the tumor extents as although NPC shows hyper-intense
signal to muscle, it has near iso-intense signal level to normal nasopharyngeal
mucosa and cerebral cortex. FS-T2/ASL fusion image provides both anatomical and
functional perfusion information, and hence offers very consistent information
as enhanced T1 image, while being contrast free. As demonstrated by this study,
FS-T2/ASL may be a viable alternative to enhanced T1 when contrast
administration is infeasible.
References
1. Lau KY, Kan WK, Sze WM, et al. Magnetic Resonance for T-staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma--the most informative pair of sequences. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2004;34(4):171-5.
2. Cai W, Li F, Wang J, et al. A comparison of arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI and DCE-MRI in human prostate cancer. NMR Biomed. 2014;27(7):817-25.