Principal Component Analysis Applied to Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting Data in Prostate
Debra F. McGivney1, Alice Yu2, Chaitra Badve3, Mark A. Griswold1,4, and Vikas Gulani1,3

1Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 3Radiology, University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH, United States, 4Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States

Synopsis

MR fingerprinting provides a way to generate quantitative information on tissue parameters, giving a set of multidimensional data at each pixel. Having a method to interpret this multidimensional data will aid in an objective and efficient means for differentiating between normal and healthy tissues, or variations between disease states. We apply principal component analysis (PCA) to MRF data along with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) to differentiate between normal and diseased (prostate cancer, prostatitis) tissue within the prostate.

Purpose

Magnetic resonance fingerprinting1 (MRF) has been shown to be an efficient and accurate method to produce simultaneous quantitative maps of tissue properties such as T1 and T2 relaxation times. These quantitative data can aid in developing objective algorithms for assessing disease by imaging. Previous works have looked to draw conclusions from quantitative MRF data in prostate cancer2 and brain tumors3, however, interpretation of this multidimensional data is difficult. In this work, we consider additional mathematical tools for interpreting the multidimensional quantitative MRF data for differentiation of normal and diseased states within the prostate. More specifically, we consider if the tissue parameters of T1 and T2 relaxation times acquired from MRF combined with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps from traditional echoplanar imaging (EPI) acquisitions can delineate between prostate cancer, prostatitis, and normal tissue within the peripheral zone. Our aim is to find a simple score that can be quickly and widely used to aid in diagnosis.

Methods

This study is HIPAA and IRB compliant. Patients were scanned on 3T scanners (Siemens Verio and Skyra) using an MRF FISP4 acquisition. Analysis on the MRF maps was provided by two radiologists, each drawing regions of interest in both suspicious lesions as well as in the normal peripheral zone (NPZ). We analyze the data from one radiologist. The T1, T2, and ADC values were averaged in each of these locations and diagnosis of the lesions was made using targeted biopsy in 22 of the cases and the remaining with untargeted transrectal ultrasound biopsies. Biopsy specimens were read clinically by a genitourinary specialized pathologist. Gleason score was assigned. Gleason 3+3=6 cancers were considered low grade, 3+4=7 intermediate, and 4+3=7 and higher were considered high grade cancers.The data were gathered into a matrix and standardized so that each column had standard deviation of one, but was not centered. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to the three-dimensional data set to project each point into one-dimensional space using the right singular vector associated with the largest singular value of the matrix X.

Results

The one-dimensional projection of the data using principal component analysis is shown in Figure 1. The results have been shifted so that a delineation can be visualized at zero; data points to the right of zero are all from the normal peripheral zone, while all of the diseased states lie to the left of zero. When data is acquired from a new patient, in terms of T1 and T2 in units of ms and ADC in units of mm2/s, this point can be projected into the one-dimensional space using the values of the first principal component found from this experiment, and given a score with the simple equation, score =-0.000939*ADC -0.001342*T1 -0.006772*T2+4.79. The last term is a shift to center the data around zero.

Discussion

PCA is a powerful tool in the analysis of a data set that describes the directions in which maximal variance is observed. PCA analysis of the prostate data results in a simple equation that can be applied to a new data point consisting of the T1, T2, and ADC measurements, projecting it into the same one-dimensional space shown in Figure 1. This will allow for a fast additional test that can potentially rule out disease or flag the individual for further testing. While a strict delineation between the diseased states themselves is not evident, that is, we do not see a distinct clustering of low grade from high and intermediate grade prostate cancers, this is something that we are hoping for in future studies. This could be achieved either from using other clustering techniques, such as kernel PCA, or by expanding the dimensionality of the data to include additional quantitative parameters measured from MRF such as perfusion. In addition, more accurate data provided by the targeted biopsies on more patients, will improve the mathematical results.

Conclusions

We have presented a simple method to cluster MRF data from the prostate into normal and diseased groups using principal component analysis. The single dimensional score shown here can be used to directly differentiate diseased from healthy tissues.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge funding from Siemens Healthcare and NIH grants 1R01EB016728-01A1 and 5R01EB017219-02.

References

1. Ma D, et al. (2013), Nature 495, 187-192. 2. Badve C et al. (2015), Proc. ISMRM 23, 3848. 3. Badve C et al. (2015), Proc. ISMRM 23, 2254. 4. Jiang Y et al. (2014) Magn. Reson. Med. 10.1002/mrm.25559.

Figures

One-dimensional projection of the ADC, T1, and T2 prostate data using principal component analysis.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2753