Ting Liang1,2, Chao Jin1, Hongwen Du1, Gang Niu1, Peng Cao1, Chenxia Li1, Miaomiao Wang1, and Jian Yang1
1Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China, People's Republic of, 2School of Life Science and Technology, Xi' an Jiaotong University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
The combined strategy
of DCE-MRI and DWI shows promising diagnosis efficiency in breast cancer. This
paper is to explore the diagnostic value of combined DCE- MRI and DWI based on
histogram-metrical in discriminating breast masses. The results indicate that combined
DWI and DCE-MRI based on histogram-metrical analysis have superior efficacy than either DCE-MRI
or DWI alone in discriminating breast masses; moreover, the parameters based on
histogram-metrical can offer additional features of tumor heterogeneity.Introduction
Dynamic
contrast-enhancement (DCE) MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) are widely
used in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. However, previous
studies have reported a low specificity on DCE-MRI
1,2, and meanwhile
there is a higher specificity but lower sensitivity on DWI. The combined strategy
of DCE-MRI and DWI provides more quantitative parameters of tumor properties.
In addition, quantitative parameters based on histogram-metrical could reflect
the information of tumor heterogeneity. The purpose of this study is to explore
the diagnostic value of combined DCE- MRI and DWI based on histogram-metrical
in discriminating breast masses.
Methods
This
study was approved by the local institutional review board. Patients:32 patients (13 benignancy and 19
malignancy) determined by needle biopsy or/and surgical pathology were
included and performed by DWI and DCE-MRI. MR
Protocols: All MR examinations were performed by a 3.0T MR scanner (GE, Signa
HDxt, USA) with 16-channel dedicated breast coil. The protocol included EPI (TR/TE,
7800ms/82ms; slice thickness, 5mm; FOV, 320mm; matrix, 128×128;b-value 1000s/mm2)
and VIBRANT sequence (TR/TE, 4.4ms/2.1ms; FA, 15o; slice thickness,
5mm; FOV, 350mm; matrix, 416×320). Data
analysis:The mean and histogram metrics (skewness, kurtosis, median,
variance, entropy and energy) of pharmacokinetic parameters (i.e. Ktrans
and kep) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) at transverse
slice with maximal tumor diameter were calculated by using commercially
Omni-Kinetics 2.0 and MATLAB software. Statistical
analysis:The comparisons between benign and malignant group in the
different parameters were used by Mann-Whitney U test. Receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted to assess the prediction
accuracies of each metric in discriminating the benignancy and malignancy by
using the commercial software (MedCalc 13.0, Mariakerke, Belgium). The combined
diagnostic indexes were estimated by Logistic regression. The ROC curves of
combined diagnostic indexes were used to assess the efficiency in identifying benign
from malignant lesions. For all tests, p<0.05
was considered as statistically significant difference.
Results
Mean and histogram
metrics (skewness) of ADC showed significantly differences between benign and
malignant lesions (
pmax=0.007).
On DCE-MRI mean and histogram metrics (median and variance) of Ktrans,
mean and 5 metrics (skewness, median, variance, entropy and energy) of kep
showed significantly differences between benign and malignant masses (
pmax=0.034). The sensitivity
and specificity of DWI, Ktrans and kep were 94.7% and
92.3%, 78.9% and 61.5%, 89.5% and 92.3%, respectively. The sensitivity and
specificity of combined DCE-MRI and DWI were 94.7% and 100%, respectively (
Table 1); The area under the ROC curve
of combined DCE-MRI and DWI, DWI, Ktrans and kep alone were 0.988,
0.976, 0.733 and 0.915 respectively (
Figure 1).The ROC analysis showed that combined DCE-MRI and DWI have a good
accuracy in identifying benign from malignant lesions, especially the
specificity was 100%.
Discussion
According
to our knowledge, three parameters (Ktrans, kep and ve)
calculated from DCE-MRI can provide quantifying tumor blood flow,
microvasculature and capillary permeability
3. DWI yields information
about possible changes in the biological environment. The quantitative
parameter-ADC reflects the mean diffusion of water molecules
4.
Therefore, combined DCE-MRI and DWI show the potential pathophysiological
process in the tumor issue. Our study obtain that the sensitivity and
specificity of combined DCE-MRI and DWI are 94.7% and 100%. It was inconsistent with a recent study, which showed
the sensitivity and specificity of combined DCE-MRI and DWI with 91.6% and 85.5%
5.
It maybe attribute to histogram analysis in
this study which has the potential to
improve specificity Thus, combined DCE-MRI and DWI based on the histogram-metrical
features have greater prospect of clinical application.
Conclusion
Combined
DWI and DCE-MRI based on histogram-metrical analysis have superior efficacy
than either DCE-MRI or DWI alone in discriminating breast masses. Moreover, the
parameters based on histogram-metrical can offer additional features of tumor heterogeneity.
Acknowledgements
This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81171317 & 81471631), the 2011 New Century Excellent Talent Support Plan from Ministry of Education of China (NCET-11-0438) and Research Development Program for Science and Technology of Shaanxi province of China (2012K13-01-07)References
1.
N. H. G. M. Peters, et al . Meta-analysis of MR imaging in the diagnosis of
breast lesions.Radiology.2008;246(1):116–124.
2. P. Gibbs, et al .Correlation of
ADC and T2 measurements with cell density in prostate cancer at 3.0 Tesla. Investigative
Radiology.2009.44(9):572–576.
3. O'Connor J P B, et al. DCE-MRI biomarkers in
the clinical evaluation of antiangiogenic and vascular disrupting agents. Brit
J Cancer. 2007. 96(2): 189–195.
4.Sibel Kul, et al. Diagnostic Efficacy of the
Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the Characterization of Different Types of Breast
Lesions.2014.40:1158-1164.
5.Li Zhang, et al. Accuracy of combined dynamic contrast-enhanced
magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging for breast cancer
detection: a meta-analysis.2015. doi: 10.1177/0284185115597265