Ana Beatriz Solana1, Erin A. Paul2, Ek Tsoon Tan3, Amee M. Shah2, Wyman W. Lai2, Christopher J. Hardy3, and Anjali Chelliah2
1GE Global Research, Garching bei Muenchen, Germany, 2Dept of Pediatrics, New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York, New York, NY, United States, 3GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY, United States
Synopsis
Phase contrast (PC)
MR flow measurements are affected by multiple sources of error, including background
phase offsets. The gold-standard approach to correct these offsets involves
repeating PC measurements on a static phantom, prolonging each CMR study and impeding
exam workflow. Here, we compared the performance of a self-calibrated correction
to static-phantom corrected PC data obtained from a pediatric and congenital
heart disease population. Self-calibrated correction results showed strong agreement with
phantom-corrected data for all vessel types and differed from static-phantom
correction by a mean difference in Qp/Qs values of only 0.069. Purpose
In this work, we evaluate the effect of a self-calibrated image-based non-linear background
phase correction
1 on 2D Phase Contrast MRI data and validate it
against gold-standard data after static phantom correction
2 in a pediatric
and congenital heart disease population.
Methods
Patients: 109 patients ages 5 months
to 60 years (mean age 15 years) with 227 PC sequences (100 aorta, 78 main pulmonary
artery (MPA), 25 right pulmonary artery (RPA) and 24 left pulmonary artery (LPA))
from the New York-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children’s Hospital congenital
CMR program between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2015 were retrospectively
identified. PC MRI free-breathing (respiratory triggered or multiple averages) data
were acquired using two GE Signa HDx 1.5T scanners (Waukesha, WI) with commercially available RF
coils as part of routine clinical CMR studies. Static phantom correction2
was performed for each of the images.
Post-hoc
correction:
Nonlinear self-calibrated phase-contrast (SCPC)1 postprocessing using
5 terms (constant + XYZ + concomitant field) was applied in all the PC series using
Matlab 2013b. Static tissue detection incorporated an automated iterative
removal of outliers and a higher weighting of velocities from the quiescent
cardiac phase to reduce effects from flow artifacts at systole. In both cases,
over-fitting was prevented. The algorithm incorporates automatic failure-mode
detection when static tissue is not properly detectable or does not reflect the
background phase within the FoV3. There are three main automatic failure-mode
types: 1) Appearance of wrapping (aliasing in the FoV)3; 2) Less
than a percentage value (set to 10% in this study) of the image FoV is detected
as static tissue; and 3) Velocity to noise ratio (VNR) in the static tissue is
less than a defined threshold (set to 0.02 in this study).
Analyses: Mean and standard-deviation
velocity values in the static tissue of the flow images for all vessels were
computed before and after non-linear correction. Additionally, velocities
within a 4-cm-radius region at isocenter (near the great vessels) after non-linear
correction and without correction were compared with ground-truth stationary
phantom correction1. Flow was evaluated using identical ROI contours
for the same dataset without correction, after non-linear correction and
evaluated against the static-phantom correction within the same ROI. Intraclass correlation (ICC) was calculated
to compare static phantom and self-calibrated corrected data. Paired t-test of
pairwise difference of the pulmonary-to-systemic flow ratio, Qp/Qs, between the
uncorrected data and self-calibrated data versus the static-phantom corrected
data (gold-standard) was computed in patients without known intracardiac shunts
or significant valvular regurgitation.
Results
Eleven PC
series were discarded automatically by the algorithm due to insufficient detected
static tissue (failure-mode type 2), and four more series were discarded due to
incorrect static-phantom acquisition. For visualization purposes, Figure 1 shows
the mean velocity maps in two acquisition planes (aorta and pulmonary
acquisition planes) of a 1-year-old patient for the uncorrected data, after
self-calibrated correction and after static phantom subtraction. The maps after
both corrections appear visually very similar; however in areas marked with
white arrows, the static tissue after self-calibrated correction appears more
homogenous and closer to velocity values of zero than after static phantom
correction. Figure 2 and Figure 3 show that non-linear correction reduced the
background velocity mean error below ±6 mm/s with reduced variability. The net
flow values obtained after self-calibrated correction showed strong agreement with
phantom-corrected net flow measurements for all vessel types (ICC = 0.98):
aorta (ICC = 0.95), MPA (ICC = 0.98), LPA (ICC = 0.99) and RPA (ICC = 0.99). Self-calibrated
correction Qp/Qs showed statistically significant (p<0.04) lower mean error
(|mean diff Qp/Qs| 0.069, SD diff Qp/Qs 0.10) than the Qp/Qs obtained from
uncorrected data (|mean diff Qp/Qs| 0.1, SD diff Qp/Qs 0.14) with respect to
the static-phantom corrected Qp/Qs in 39 patients without shunts or
regurgitation.
Discussion
Self-calibrated non-linear
background phase correction showed a very high level of agreement in great vessel
net flow measurements and Qp/Qs ratios with phantom correction in a pediatric
and follow-up congenital-heart-disease population. Although static-phantom
correction is considered the gold-standard to correct for background phase
correction in PC MRI, image-based correction algorithms, as the one evaluated
here, have the potential to perform better as the background phase is evaluated
under identical conditions, with the same coil loading, body shape, tissue
susceptibilities, etc. These results are also encouraging for the future of accurate
quantitation of 4D flow measurements as a static-phantom acquisition would prohibitively
increase CMR study time.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Tan ET et al., ISMRM 2014
[2] Chernobelsky et al, LCMRM 2007
[3] Solana et
al, ISMRM 2015