Eleanor S K Berry1, Peter Jezzard1, and Thomas W Okell1
1FMRIB Centre, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
Synopsis
Vessel-encoded pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (VEPCASL) can be
used to obtain vessel-selective time-resolved angiograms. Here we compare accelerated
Cartesian and radial readouts to demonstrate the feasibility of speeding up their
acquisition, enabling better prospects for use of the method in a clinical setting.
It was possible to acquire 2D vessel-selective angiograms in less than one
minute. Accelerated (undersampled) radial acquisition consistently led to
angiograms with higher signal-to-noise ratio and better quality peripheral
artery imaging versus accelerated Cartesian imaging.Purpose
To assess the possibility of acquiring vessel-selective
time-resolved angiograms in the brain in less than one minute using accelerated
Cartesian and radial readouts.
Background
Vessel-encoded pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (VEPCASL)1
can visualize the delivery of blood from individual arteries in the brain. This
technique has previously been used to obtain 2D vessel-selective dynamic
angiograms in ~10 minutes2. Here we compare two accelerated readout schemes
– one Cartesian and one radial – to demonstrate the feasibility of acquisition
in approximately one minute, enabling the method to be deployed in a busy
clinical protocol.
Methods
Five healthy subjects were scanned on a 3T Verio
system (Siemens, Germany), with a 32-channel head coil. Two standard 3D
multislab time-of-flight angiography sequences were performed at the start of
each scan to localize the four main brain-feeding vessels and position the imaging
slice over the circle of Willis. A unipolar VEPCASL3 pulse train was
applied using the Optimized Encoding Scheme4. Other labeling
parameters were as in Okell et al2. This resulted in eight labeling
cycles followed by one of three 2D bSSFP acquisitions: an accelerated Cartesian
readout and two evenly undersampled radial readouts, i.e. constant azimuthal
angle spacing (see parameters in Figure 1). The Cartesian readout was applied
with GRAPPA factor 4 and acquired in ~63 s. The first radial readout was
undersampled (80 spokes, undersampling factor versus fully sampled radial = 4.4)
to match the acquisition time of the Cartesian readout. The second radial
readout was further undersampled (60 spokes, undersampling factor = 5.9) to
assess angiogram acquisition in less than one minute. All readouts maintained a
temporal resolution of ~100 ms. All raw images were reconstructed online with
Siemens software.
Image analysis was performed using a Bayesian
maximum a posteriori (MAP) method5
to separate out vessel-specific information. The SNR in the vessels for each
subject, using a somewhat heuristic metric, was then calculated as follows:
1. Mask signal from outside the brain and any large artifacts at the center
(Figure 2a)
2. Create vessel-specific signal masks according to the dominant feeding artery
of each voxel meeting the signal threshold in data averaged across acquisitions.
The threshold was set at two-thirds of the 99th percentile of the averaged data
signal, to reduce inclusion of voxels away from the main brain-feeding arteries
3. Select a noise region-of-interest from the center of the brain of each
subject, avoiding any arteries, to assess noise close to vessels of interest
4. Calculate the SNR for each vessel, considering only signal within the
vessel masks.
Results
Across subjects scan times of approximately one
minute and below were achieved. Figure 3a shows an example vessel-selective
angiogram. Figure 3b illustrates the poorer SNR of the Cartesian acquisition in
both peripheral (orange arrow) and more proximal arteries (blue arrow) versus
the time-matched radial acquisition (Figure 3c). In Figure 3d increased streak
artifacts towards the periphery (orange arrow) can be seen versus the more
densely sampled radial acquisition (Figure 3c). However, there is still visibly
better SNR (blue arrow) around more proximal vessels versus the Cartesian
acquisition.
The mean SNR, averaged across all vessels and subjects,
for the Cartesian acquisition (SNR = 3.07 +/- 1.76) was significantly lower than both
the 80 spoke (SNR = 6.04 +/- 3.05, p~10-5) and 60 spoke (SNR = 5.87 +/- 3.02,
p~10-4) radial acquisitions according to paired t-tests (Figure 4).
There was no significant difference between the radial acquisitions.
Discussion
It is possible to acquire vessel-selective
angiograms in one minute with accelerated Cartesian and radial readouts. The
Cartesian readout with high GRAPPA factor reduced SNR in the center of the
brain around vessels of interest. Radial undersampling, however, has reduced SNR
at the edges of the FOV, away from these vessels. Additionally,
vessel-selective angiograms were acquired in less than one minute by further
undersampling the radial acquisition. The result was angiograms with increased streak
artifacts, but the peripheral arteries were better delineated than in
accelerated Cartesian acquisitions (Figure 3). Cartesian and radial images
suffered from sizeable artifacts around the basilar artery if it was included
in the imaging slice (Figure 2), perhaps due to pulsatile blood or cerebrospinal
fluid flow, which can affect the ability of the MAP analysis to correctly
separate vessel information. Future work will include assessing cardiac gating
for the method, to reduce artifacts around the basilar artery, and applying the
accelerated radial protocols in a patient group to assess their viability in a
clinical setting.
Acknowledgements
With
thanks to Jesus College Oxford, the EPSRC, Royal Academy of Engineering and
Dunhill Medical Trust for funding support and to Siemens Healthcare for
providing the base pulse sequence code.References
1.
Wong, E. C. (2007), Vessel-encoded arterial spin-labeling using pseudocontinuous tagging. Magn Reson Med, 58: 1086–1091. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21293
2. Okell, T. W., Chappell, M. A., Woolrich, M. W., Günther, M., Feinberg, D. A. and Jezzard, P. (2010), Vessel-encoded dynamic magnetic resonance angiography using arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med, 64: 698–706. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22458
3. Wong, E. C. and Guo, J. (2012), Blind detection of vascular sources and territories using random vessel encoded arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Mater Phy, 25: 95-101. doi:10.1007/s10334-011-0302-7
4. Berry, E. S. K., Jezzard, P. and Okell, T. W. (2015), An Optimized Encoding Scheme for Planning Vessel-Encoded Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin Labeling. Magn Reson Med, 74: 1248–1256. doi: 10.1002/mrm.25508
5. Chappell, M.A., Okell, T., Payne, S.J., Jezzard, P. and Woolrich, M.W. (2012), A fast analysis method for non-invasive imaging of blood flow in individual cerebral arteries using vessel-encoded arterial spin labeling angiography. Medical Image Analysis, 16: 831-839. doi:10.1016/j.media.2011.12.004