Imaging Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforators with Phase Contrast Magnetic Resonance Angiography: A Feasibility Demonstration
Xiangyu Yang1, Michael Miller2, and Michael V Knopp1

1Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States, 2Plastic Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States

Synopsis

Currently, MRA is not considered the optimal technique for preoperative imaging of perforators before flap reconstructive plastic surgeries. In this prospective study, we demonstrate that the quality of perforator MRA can be greatly enhanced by using the phase contrast technique. Perforator imaging with PC-MRA not only generates images with better quality and contrast than X-ray and iodinated contrast based CTA, the current clinical gold-standard, but also offers unique features, such as the capability to visualize venous flow and differentiate perforator arteries and veins, that are highly relevant to the design, planning, and execution of DIEP flap reconstructive surgery.

Purpose

Preoperative perforator imaging is a key component in state of the art tissue transfer (“flap”) reconstructive plastic surgeries 1. Up to now, MR Angiography (MRA) has not had an important role in this clinical application. Most of the existing efforts in literature focused on contrast enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) techniques, and were considered inferior to Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) in both spatial resolution and perforator-to-fat contrast 2, 3. Phase Contrast MRA (PC-MRA) can be acquired with very high contrast and resolution 4. However, to our knowledge, no effort has ever been made to image perforators with PC-MRA. In this study, we explore the feasibility of visualizing deep inferior epigastric perforators (DIEP) with PC-MRA, and report our experiences in a few initial demonstration cases.

Methods

Our perforator PC-MRA sequence was implemented on a 3T Achieva scanner (Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH) equipped with a 32-channel cardiac coil. The subjects were scanned in prone position so that the coil physically restricted respiratory motion of the abdominal wall. Only the anterior piece of the coil was used for RF signal reception. A saturation band was placed after the anterior edge of aorta to further reduce motion artifact. The PC-MRA sequence was acquired with 0.5 mm in-plane resolution, which is slightly better than the axial resolution of advanced multi-detector CT scanners. The other scan parameters were: 350x100x200 mm3 Field-Of-View, 1.5 mm slice, TR/TE = 8.7/5.2 ms, flip angle 11°, 1.5x SENSE acceleration, Vmax = 15 cm/s, respiratory triggered. In order to get better details in stationary soft tissues, the PC-MRA images are fused with a T2-TSE data set acquired with the following sequence parameters: 420x300x198 mm3 Field-of-View, 0.7 mm in-plane resolution, 5 mm slice with 0.5 mm gap, TR/TE = 838/80 ms, flip angle 90°, 2x SENSE acceleration, respiratory triggered. In consideration of the reviewer’s reading habit, the grayscale of the T2-TSE data was reversed to mimic soft tissue contrast in CTA. Both sequences were respiratory triggered. The total acquisition time was 15-25 minutes.

PC-MRA data were acquired from three female patients (42/50/51 years old) prior to DIEP flap surgery, and compared with their standard-of-care DIEP CTA. The CTA data were acquired on a Definition AS+ CT (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a 100 kVp technique after intravenous injection of Omnipaque (GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ), and reconstructed to 0.75 mm slice thickness. PC-MRA and CTA maximum intensity projection (MIP) were compared at various thicknesses on an Intellispace Portal workstation (Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH). Image quality and perforator visualization were evaluated by a senior Plastic Surgeon. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of major perforators and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) in the rectus abdominis muscle and the subcutaneous fat layer were measured. Statistical comparison was performed with the R language (The R Foundation, Vienna, Austria).

A healthy male volunteer (36 years old) was also scanned with the PC-MRA protocol to test the feasibility of differentiating perforator arteries and veins with delayed reconstruction of PC-MRA data.

Results

A total number of 8 major perforators were identified in three patients. They have significantly higher SNR in PC-MRA (41.4±9.9) than in CTA (6.3±4.1, P < 0.001). PC-MRA also has significantly higher CNR in both muscle (PC-MRA: 36.7±9.7; CTA: 2.7±4.0, P < 0.001) and fat (PC-MRA: 39.4±9.9; CTA: 11.6±4.4, P < 0.001). These quantitative measurements were confirmed by visual assessment of the Plastic Surgeon, who rated the PC-MRA as having higher image quality and better visualization of perforator courses in all three cases. Figure 1 shows an example in which the perforator’s course was better visualized by PC-MRA than CTA in both muscle and fat. Another example in Figure 2 demonstrates how well PC-MRA visualizes a parallel perforator artery-vein pair that CTA cannot detect. In Figure 3, exploratory data from a volunteer shows that perforator artery and vein in such a pair can be easily differentiated with their flow directions revealed through delayed reconstruction of the three velocity components from the PC-MRA raw data.

Discussion and Conclusion

Preliminary results from this study demonstrate that in preoperative DIEP imaging applications, PC-MRA has not only more competitive spatial resolution and contrast properties than CTA, but also some unique features (such as venous flow visualization and artery/vein differentiation) that CTA cannot provide. Therefore, we conclude that PC-MRA’s potential as a preoperative imaging tool has been substantially underestimated. Imaging perforators with PC-MRA is not only feasible, but also worth of continuous development and investigation to advance the utilization of such a safe MRI based approach.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Saint-Cyr M, Schaverien M, Rohrich R. Perforator flaps: history, controversies, physiology, anatomy, and use in reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009; 123(4):132e-145e.

2. Cina A, Barone-Adesi L, Rinaldi P, et al. Planning deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: a comparison between multidetector computed tomography and magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23(8):2333-43.

3. Pauchot J, Aubry S, Kastler A, et al. Preoperative imaging for deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps: a comparative study of computed tomographic angiography and magnetic resonance angiography. Eur J Plast Surg. 2012; 35:795–801.

4. Moran P, A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn Reson Imaging. 1982; 1:197-203

Figures

Figure 1. The course of the perforator is better visualized by PC-MRA (B) than CTA (A) in both rectus abdominis muscle (white solid arrow) and subcutaneous fat (white hollow arrow) in a 51-year-old female patient.

Figure 2. PC-MRA of a 42-year-old female patient (B) reveals a perforator artery-vein pair (white solid arrow) that is not detected by CTA (A).

Figure 3. Preliminary data from a 36-year-old male volunteer shows that perforator artery and vein in a parallel pair seen with PC-MRA (A) can be differentiated with the Foot-Head component of flow velocity (B, white solid arrow).




Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2689