Glioblastoma growth and invasion kinetics correlate with MRI ADC metrics
Pamela R Jackson1, Andrea Hawkins-Daarud1, Joshua Jacobs2, Timothy Ung3, Hani Malone3, Joo Kim4, Olya Stringfield5, Lauren DeGirolamo1, Emilio Benbassat6, Anthony Rosenberg6, Joseph Crisman6, Robert Gatenby4, Savannah Partridge7, Peter Canoll3, and Kristin Swanson1

1Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, United States, 2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States, 3Pathology, Columbia University, New York City, NY, United States, 4Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States, 5Cancer Imaging and Metabolism, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, United States, 6Chicago, IL, United States, 7Radiology, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, United States

Synopsis

We hypothesize that tumors with different invasiveness indices (D/ρ), as predicted by the Proliferation-Invasion (PI) mathematical model, will exhibit differences in ADC. Segmented tumor volumes were determined on T1Gd and FLAIR MRIs for six GBM patients. The ROIs were used to mask registered ADC maps and parameterize the PI model for calculating D/ρ. Lower quartile ADC values within the FLAIR and FLAIR penumbra ROIs were positively correlated with D/ρ (p=0.041 and p=0.026, respectively). ADC skewness within the T1Gd ROI negatively correlated with D/ρ (p=0.021). Understanding the relationship between D/ρ and ADC could be important for targeting brain tumor therapies.

Purpose

We have previously developed a novel patient-specific Proliferation-Invasion (PI) mathematical model1 to estimate tumor cell invasion in glioblastoma (GBM). The PI model is parameterized with tumor volumes delineated on clinical MRIs and has been implemented to determine effectiveness of treatment2,3, assess surgical resection benefit4, predict IDH1 mutation status5, and optimize radiotherapy6. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculated from diffusion-weighted MRI is implicated as predictive of tumor cellularity and microstructure in GBM. The purpose of our study was to investigate whether tumor ADC values are associated with levels of tumor cell invasion, as predicted by the PI model.

Methods

MRI: Our retrospective study included six patients (mean age: 65.5 years, 50% female) with contrast-enhancing GBMs. Each subject underwent MRI with T1Gd, FLAIR and DWI sequences acquired at 1.5T or 3T. ADC maps were calculated on a pixel-by-pixel basis at the console. The T1Gd images and ADC maps were first registered to the FLAIR images for each patient (Mirada Medical, Denver, CO). The volume of abnormality was determined separately on T1Gd and FLAIR images for each tumor using in-house software developed in MATLAB (Natick, MA). T1Gd regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn to exclude necrosis. A FLAIR penumbra ROI was created by subtracting the T1Gd ROI from the FLAIR ROI. The T1Gd, FLAIR, and FLAIR penumbra ROIs were then used to mask the ADC maps. Summary statistics were calculated for the ADCs within each ROI: mean, median, minimum, maximum, standard deviation, range, lower quartile (25th quantile), upper quartile (75th quantile), interquartile range, mode, and skewness. For each patient, a circular ROI (5 pixel radius) was drawn in the contralateral normal appearing white matter (cNAWM) on three consecutive slices depicting the T1Gd abnormality. PI Model: The PI model relates tumor cell density (c) to tumor cell diffusion (D) and tumor cell proliferation (ρ)

$$ \frac{\partial a}{\partial b}=\triangledown \cdot(D(x)\triangledown c)+\rho c(1-\frac{c}{k})$$

where t is time, x is location, and k is cell carrying capacity. The edge of the T1Gd volume is associated with 80% cell density and the edge of the FLAIR ROI is associated with 16% cell density7. A feature of this model is that the solution asymptotically approaches a traveling wave when solved in spherical symmetry. The invasiveness index, D/ρ, is reflective of the shape of this wavefront (Figure 1), independent of the speed at which it is travelling4. Thus, it can be estimated given two points on the wavefront from a single time point, which we obtain from T1Gd and T2/FLAIR MRIs. For the results presented here, the D/ρ values for each tumor were estimated via a Bayesian technique. By holding the product constant, asymptotic wavefront velocity, the Bayesian technique allowed us to find the most likely value of D/ρ which minimized error between the model prediction and observed radial values while allowing for 0.5 mm spherically-equivalent radial error in both the observation and in the MRI acquisition. Statistics: Dunn’s multiple comparisons test was used to compare the ADC values in the cNAWM to different tumor ROIs. We used linear regression modeling to evaluate the relationship between ADC metrics for each ROI and D/ρ. A p-value of 0.05 was used to determine significance.

Results

For the 6 GBMs evaluated, D/ρ ranged from 0.89 to 3.40 mm2. T1Gd volumes ranged from 22.0 to 72.6 cm3 and FLAIR volumes ranged from 74.7 to 200.3 cm3. Figure 2 shows that the mean ADC within the cNAWM ROIs were significantly lower than in the FLAIR and FLAIR penumbra ROIs (adjusted p=0.005 and 0.011, respectively). Figures 3 and 4 show that the lower quartile of ADC values within the FLAIR and FLAIR penumbra ROIs were positively correlated with D/ρ (p=0.041 and p=0.026, respectively). Additionally, the skewness of ADC values within the T1Gd abnormality negatively correlated with D/ρ (p=0.021, Figure 5).

Discussion

Generally, tumors with higher D/ρ are thought to be more invasive than tumors with lower D/ρ. The FLAIR region, particularly outside of the T1Gd, is the more invasive portion of tumor that includes a complex interplay between normal tissue, tumor cells, and edema. Within the FLAIR abnormality, it is possible that the leading edge of tumor is beginning to breakdown normal tissue structure and the degree to which this occurs is best reflected by lower quartile ADC values. Previous work has shown that evaluating the lower portion of ADC histograms can be indicative of response to treatment8,9. We plan explore this further in a greater number of patients.

Conclusion

Understanding the relationship between D/ρ and ADC could be important for targeting brain tumor therapies, quantifying response to treatment, and further refining the PI model.

Acknowledgements

This work sponsored by Diversity Supplement 3R01CA164371-03S1.

References

1. Swanson, K. R., Bridge, C., Murray, J. D. & Alvord, E. C. Virtual and real brain tumors: Using mathematical modeling to quantify glioma growth and invasion. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 216, 1–10 (2003).

2. Neal, M. L. et al. Response classification based on a minimal model of glioblastoma growth is prognostic for clinical outcomes and distinguishes progression from pseudoprogression. Cancer Res. 73, 2976–86 (2013).

3. Neal, M. L. et al. Discriminating survival outcomes in patients with glioblastoma using a simulation-based, patient-specific response metric. PLoS One 8, e51951 (2013).

4. Baldock, A. L. et al. Patient-specific metrics of invasiveness reveal significant prognostic benefit of resection in a predictable subset of gliomas. PLoS One 9, e99057 (2014).

5. Baldock, A. L. et al. Invasion and proliferation kinetics in enhancing gliomas predict IDH1 mutation status. Neuro. Oncol. 16, 779–86 (2014).

6. Corwin, D. et al. Toward patient-specific, biologically optimized radiation therapy plans for the treatment of glioblastoma. PLoS One 8, e79115 (2013).

7. Harpold, H. L. P., Alvord, E. C. & Swanson, K. R. The evolution of mathematical modeling of glioma proliferation and invasion. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 66, 1–9 (2007).

8. Pope, W. B. et al. Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: ADC histogram analysis predicts response to bevacizumab treatment. Radiology 252, 182–9 (2009).

9. Pope, W. B. et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis stratifies progression-free survival in newly diagnosed bevacizumab-treated glioblastoma. AJNR. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 32, 882–9 (2011).

Figures

Figure 1: PI model solutions asymptotically approach a traveling wave when solved in spherical symmetry. The invasiveness index, D/ ρ, can be estimated given two points on the wavefront from a single time point, which we obtain from the T1Gd and FLAIR MRIs4.

Figure 2: Mean ADC within the contralateral normal appearing white matter (cNAWM) was significantly lower than in the FLAIR or FLAIR penumbra ROIs (* indicates significance).

Figure 3: FLAIR ROIs of GBM. Lower quartile ADC values within the FLAIR abnormalities were positively correlated with D/ρ (p=0.041).

Figure 4: FLAIR penumbra ROIs of GBM. Lower quartile ADC values within the FLAIR penumbra regions were positively correlated with D/ρ (p=0.026).

Figure 5: T1Gd ROIs of GBM. The skewness of ADC values within the T1Gd abnormalities negatively correlated with D/ρ (p=0.021).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
2654