Arna van Engelen1, Markus Henningsson1, and Rene Botnar1
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
Synopsis
The aim of this study was to perform
automatic coronary artery centerline tracking on coronary MRI data, in a
clinically relevant population. Our method consisted of computation of a
vesselness filter followed by fast marching. Parameters were optimized on three
subjects, and performance was evaluated on 27 other subjects. Centrelines were
traced between a start and end point, and when needed with one additional point
in between. Tracking was successful in 92% (RCA), 88% (LAD) and 65% (LCX), with
a median distance from manual annotation of 1.0mm. These results show that
automatic centerline tracking on coronary MRI data is possible.Purpose
Detecting coronary artery abnormalities is
crucial in the management of coronary artery disease. Traditionally CT
angiography (CTA) is the modality of choice to detect stenosis, however, acquisition
and image quality of coronary MR angiography (CMRA) has improved considerably over
the past years
1,2,3. Image-based respiratory motion correction yields
high-quality images by free-breathing, and allows accurate depiction of the
coronary arteries and lumen narrowing stenosis
4. For time-efficient
analysis automatic centerline tracking is required. This has extensively been
investigated in CTA
5, but only before recent improvements in
acquisition were made in CMRA
6. The aim of this study was to perform
automatic coronary artery centerline tracking on state-of-the-art CMRA data, in
a clinically relevant population.
Methods
Data
Thirty patients with suspected coronary
artery disease were included. CMRA images (acquired resolution 1.3 mm isotropic,
reconstructed ~0.74x0.74x0.65 mm) were acquired as described in4. A 2D
image navigator was generated by spatially encoding the startup echoes, and
gating was achieved using a diminishing variance algorithm7. Clinical
records indicated that 9 patients had single or multi-vessel disease based on
previous CTA or X-ray imaging.
Centreline tracking
For reference manual centerlines were
annotated on the three main coronary artery branches: right coronary artery (RCA),
left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex (LCX). Occluded (3) and
stented (2) arteries were excluded.
Automatic centerline extraction consisted
of two steps: 1) vesselness computation and 2) fast marching. The vesselness
filter8 has widely been used for vascular analysis in medical
images. This filter enhances vessel-like structures by using the eigenvalues of
the Hessian matrix, which is composed by local second order derivatives of the
image8. The implementation of the vesselness filter involves several
parameters that need to be optimized based on the target vessel and image type.
Based on the expected size of coronary arteries we computed the Hessian matrix
at three scales: 0.5, 1 and 1.5 mm, and for each voxel took the maximum vesselness
response. The parameters α and β were used to balance between tube- and
plane-like structures and the deviation from blob-like structures, and were
optimized on a random selection of three patients (9 arteries). Combinations
for α and β of 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 0.9 were evaluated.
Centrelines were traced between the start
and end point of each manually annotated centerline. The fast marching
algorithm was used to compute a vesselness-based distance map with respect to
the start of the centerline. Subsequently the shortest path from the end point
to this start point was traced.
The settings that yielded the smallest average
centerline distance between the automatic and manual centerlines were used to
analyse the arteries of the remaining 27 patients. All implementations were
done in Matlab.
Evaluation
Results were visually assessed for correct
tracing, and if errors were detected a second automatic tracing was performed
using one additional point on the manual centerline in the area where the
tracing went wrong. Secondly, centerline distances were evaluated. Both manual
and automatic centerlines were resampled to a 0.1mm spacing. For each point on
each automatic centerline the shortest distance to the manual centerline was
determined. Lastly, the length of each manual centerline was determined, as
well as the distance of this centerline that could be traced correctly
automatically.
Results
The optimized parameters for vesselness
computation were α=0.9 and β=0.3. Four examples of obtained vesselness images
are shown in Figure 1. All (quantitative) results are provided in Figure 2. Examples
of automatically traced centerlines are shown in Figures 3 and 4.
Discussion
Automatic centerline extraction from CMRA
is possible in 74% of arteries in clinically relevant patients, increasing to
82% when one additional point on the centerline could be used. Lowest accuracy
was found for LCX, which was mainly caused by wrong tracing through neighboring
veins. However, generally, these results show promise for automatic coronary
artery analysis on CMRA.
Conclusion
Automatic centerline extraction is possible
from CMRA data. Future work will focus on automated stenosis detection.
Acknowledgements
This research has been supported by the EPSRC
Technology Strategy Board (UK)References
1.
Henningsson et al., MRM 2012
2.
Piccini et al., MRM 2012
3. Pang et al., MRM 2014
4.
Henningsson et al., ISMRM, 2015
5.
Schaap
et al., Medical Image Analysis 2009
6.
Wink
et al., MRM 2002
7.
Sachs et al., MRM 1995
8.
Frangi
et al., MICCAI 1998