Magnus Ziegler1,2, Jonas Lantz1,2, Tino Ebbers1,2, and Petter Dyverfeldt1,2
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 2Centre for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Synopsis
Chaotic velocity fluctuations caused by turbulent blood flow create
fluctuations in the shear stress acting on the vascular wall. This turbulent
wall shear stress can cause vascular remodeling and increased endothelial cell
turnover. This work explores the use of MR-estimated turbulent kinetic energy
(TKE) for mapping the turbulent wall shear stress. Time-resolved velocity data
for non-pulsatile flow was obtained using computational fluid dynamics in two
patient-derived geometries and used to simulate PC-MRI measurements. Near-wall
TKE was estimated using a novel sampling method and was found to correlate
strongly to turbulent wall shear stress, opening new avenues for analysis.Purpose
Chaotic velocity fluctuations caused by turbulent blood flow create
fluctuations in the shear stress acting on the vascular wall. This is referred
to as turbulent wall shear stress (tWSS) and may cause vascular remodeling and
increased endothelial cell turnover [1]. The purpose of this work
was to explore the use of MR-estimated near-wall turbulent kinetic energy (TKE)
for the assessment of tWSS.
Methods
In disturbed or turbulent flows, the WSS can be separated into a mean
and a fluctuating component using Reynolds decomposition:
$$$WSS = \overline{WSS}+WSS'$$$
. WSS' describes the variation of WSS due to fast
chaotic variations in velocity. The standard deviation of WSS is a measure of
the turbulent WSS (tWSS). 4D flow MRI permits estimation of velocity
fluctuation intensity and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE) [2,3]. TKE
dissipated near the wall represents a large proportion of the kinetic energy
lost near the vascular wall. Therefore, this
study assessed the relationship between near-wall TKE
and tWSS.
Time-resolved velocity data of
non-pulsatile turbulent flow was obtained using the large eddy computational
fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations for a patient-derived aortic coarctation (CoA)
geometry and an aortic stenosis (AS) geometry [4,5]. Two physiological flow conditions were simulated per
geometry. This high-resolution flow data was used as input for simulated PC-MRI
measurements and also served as ground truth.
The time-resolved velocity data
was used to simulate PC-MRI measurements at three voxel sizes (1, 2, 2.5 mm
isotropic) using methods described previously [6,7]. The VENC was set to 1.5 m/s. Partial
volume effects at the wall were incorporated into the simulation by modelling
the vessel wall as having zero velocity and the same MR signal amplitude as the
lumen.
Near-wall TKE estimation was performed for
wall voxels by calculating the mean TKE from voxels inside a predefined maximum
radius. In order to avoid voxels that have severe overlap with the wall, any
voxel that was immediately adjacent to the wall was excluded. The maximum
sampling radius from the centre of the wall voxel was 5.5 mm for 1 mm volumes, 7
mm for 2 mm volumes, and 8.75 for 2.5 mm volumes.
Linear regression analysis was used
to assess agreement between the MR-estimated near-wall TKE and the true
near-wall TKE from CFD. Linear regression was used to assess the relationship
between near-wall TKE and tWSS. All regressions had their intercepts fixed to
zero, and are reported as slope +/- standard error (SE). A p-value < 0.001
was considered significant.
Results
Linear regression showed a strong correlation between MR-estimated
near-wall TKE values and the true near-wall TKE from CFD. Across all models,
the mean slope was 1.05 +/- 0.06, with an average R2 of 0.90 +/- 0.01. Figure
1 shows representative correlations for the CoA and AS models.
Visual inspection of the estimated near-wall TKE against ground truth
tWSS shows that the regions of high near-wall TKE correspond to regions of high
tWSS in both the CoA and AS (Figure 2, Figure 3). In both the CoA and AS, the
region with highest tWSS and near wall TKE is seen immediately downstream of
the constricted region. Linear regression analysis showed strong correlations
between near-wall TKE and tWSS (Table 1). In general, R2 values were
greater than 0.75, except in the CoA with low Reynolds number. All slopes were
significantly different from zero.
Discussion and Conclusion
MR-estimated near-wall TKE correlates strongly with tWSS in models of aortic
coarctation and stenosis. The relationship between near-wall TKE and tWSS remains
linear with respect to spatial resolution, in contrast to methods which
approximate the velocity gradient for WSS estimation. Unfortunately, as yet there
is no established link between TKE to tWSS and therefore no procedure to
estimate the absolute value of tWSS using TKE. As such, only relative maps of
tWSS can be generated using near-wall TKE. However, the resulting maps have
strong visual correspondence to the CFD-derived ground truth in all cases. The
slope of the regression line appears to decrease as voxel size increases, and a
similar trend with respect to Reynolds number is seen. However, more models
must be used to investigate these trends.
The possibility to identify regions of elevated tWSS opens new pathways
for understanding pathologically driven vascular remodelling, damage to
endothelial cells, and plaque rupture.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Davies PF, Remuzzi A, Gordon EJ, Dewey CF, Gimbrone MA. Turbulent fluid shear stress induces vascular endothelial cell
turnover in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 1986;83(April):2114–2117.
2. Dyverfeldt P,
Sigfridsson A, Kvitting JPE, Ebbers T. Quantification of intravoxel velocity
standard deviation and turbulence intensity by generalizing phase-contrast MRI.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2006;56(4):850–858.
3. Dyverfeldt P,
Gårdhagen R, Sigfridsson A, Karlsson M, Ebbers T. On MRI turbulence
quantification. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2009;27(7):913–22.
4. Lantz J, Gårdhagen
R, Karlsson M. Quantifying turbulent wall shear stress in a subject specific
human aorta using large eddy simulation. Medical Engineering & Physics.
2012;34(8):1139–48.
5. Andersson M, Lantz
J, Ebbers T, Karlsson M. Quantitative Assessment of Turbulence and Flow
Eccentricity in an Aortic Coarctation: Impact of Virtual Interventions.
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology. 2015 Mar 3.
6. Petersson S,
Dyverfeldt P, Gårdhagen R, Karlsson M, Ebbers T. Simulation of phase contrast
MRI of turbulent flow. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2010;64(4):1039–46.
7. Casas B, Lantz J,
Dyverfeldt P, Ebbers T. 4D flow MRI-Based pressure loss estimation in stenotic
flows: Evaluation using numerical simulations. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
2015; in press.