Julio Sotelo1,2,3, Jesús Urbina1,4, Cristian Montalba1, Israel Valverde5,6, Cristian Tejos1,2,7, Pablo Irarrazaval1,2,7, Marcelo Andia1,4,7, Daniel E Hurtado3,7, and Sergio Uribe1,4,7
1Biomedical Imaging Center, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 2Electrical Engineering Department, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 3Structural and Geotechnical Engineering Departement, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 4Radiology Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile, 5Pediatric Cardiology Unit, Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain, 6Cardiovascular Pathology Unit, Institute of Biomedicine of Seville (IBIS), Hospital Virgen del Rocio, Seville, Spain, 7Biological and Medical Engineering Institute, Schools of Engineering, Medicine and Biological Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Synopsis
Aortic coarctation (CoA) cause an irreversible pressure loss post-CoA
given by the energy dissipation, increasing the ventricular workload. Turbulent
flows through CoA generate an irreversible damage in the surrounding tissue for
mechanical stresses. We implement a finite elements method to obtain 3D maps of
energy loss, kinetic energy, vorticity and helicity from 4D flow data. We
performed an in-vitro study that related the pressure gradient, pulse wave
velocity and elastic modulus with the energy loss and vorticity and helicity
parameters. Concluding that our method may allow assessing the severity of the CoA
and the identification of the regions affected.Purpose:
Invasive diagnostic catheterizations are
normally required to evaluate the pressure gradient in patient with Coarctation of the Aorta (CoA), allowing the
assessment of vascular function and revealing the severity of the disease
1.
The CoA cause an irreversible pressure loss post-CoA given by the energy
dissipation, increasing the ventricular workload required to maintain a certain
arterial pressure. Additionally, turbulent flows posterior to the CoA can
generate an irreversible damage in the surrounding tissue under mechanical
stresses fluctuation
2. Some method based on MRI to calculate the
energy loss and turbulence
3,4 have been proposed. These methods uses
finite differences, however, this technique cannot handle the smooth and
complex boundaries of vessels in the cardiovascular system, and therefore
induces important errors when the geometry is simplified
5. In this
work we proposed a method based on finite elements to obtain 3D quantitative
maps of energy loss, kinetic energy, vorticity and helicity from 4D-flow data sets. We performed an
in-vitro study that related the pressure gradient (PG), pulse wave velocity
(PWV) and elastic modulus with the energy loss, vorticity and helicity
parameters.
Methods:
We developed a finite element based computational
framework to obtain the velocities gradient from 4D-flow in three orthogonal direction generating continuous 3D
maps of energy loss, kinetic energy and turbulence parameters. The algorithm is
based in a similar least-squares projection method previously published
6.
Using a MR Phillips Achieva 1.5T, the 4D-flow
data was acquired in a realistic aortic phantom in normal conditions and with three different CoA 13, 11,
9 mm, one volunteer and one patient with repair CoA (Figure 1). Additionally,
for the phantom with and without CoA we acquire 2D-flow (2D PC-MRI) in two position, the ascending and descending aorta in order to
calculate the PWV between these two points (see figure 1A-B). The phantom model
T-S-N-005 (Elastrat Sàrl, Geneva, Switzerland) is used with a pulsatile
MR-compatible flow pump (Simutec, London, Ontario, Canada), and a
catheterization unit to measure invasively pressures between the ascending and
descending aorta in order to obtain the elastic modulus between these two
points (see figure 1). A summary of the MR acquisition parameters is shown in table
I. The process for creating the tetrahedral mesh from the 4D-flow images consist in: first, a
generation of an angiography image, then a segmentation of the lumen of the
aorta applying an intensity threshold separating the vessel of interest, and
finally creating a tetrahedral mesh using the library iso2mesh in Matlab. The
next step is to transfer the velocity field over each node of the tetrahedral
mesh using a cubic interpolation. The finite element analysis was developed using
the Python
software,
and for the visualization and analysis of the data we used the open source software Paraview.
Results and Discussion:
Result of PG, PWV and EM for the phatom data are
shown in table II. We can see a reduction of the PWV if we increase the
severity of the coarctation in the phantom, this is probably generated by the
loss of kinetic energy of the flow that pass through the coarctation, affecting
the pressure gradient between the ascending and descending aorta. Additionally,
the elastic modulus decreased in the ascending aorta for small coarctations. In
figure 2 we show the 3D result for
vorticity, helicity density, energy loss and kinetic energy for the phantom
data with and without CoA. There was an increment of turbulent flow (Vorticity
and helicity density) for small CoA, that generated higher loss of energy in this
location, affecting directly the pulse propagation along the vessel. The peak
values of vorticity, helicity density, energy loss and kinetic energy for all
cardiac phases were: 500/1500/1200/875 s
-1, ±60/±420/±150/±100 m/s
2,
20/200/70/46 μW and 34/240/118/60 μJ
for the phantom without CoA and with CoA of 9 mm, 11 mm and 13 mm respectively.
To show the applicability of our method we apply our algorithm in one patient
with a repair CoA and one volunteer (Figure 3). The peak values obtained in the patient and volunteer data were:
1000/800 s
-1, ±190/±70 m/s
2, 120/74 μW
and 120/110 μJ for vorticity, helicity density, energy loss
and kinetic energy respectively.
Conclusion:
We have proposed a
novel method that allowed us to obtain 3D maps
of
energy loss, kinetic energy and turbulence parameters derived from
4D-flow data using finite elements, which has
been validate in data obtained from an aortic
phantom. From the validation process we can conclude that the 3D maps of energy
loss together with the vorticity and helicity may allow assessing the severity
of the CoA and the identification of the regions affected.
Acknowledgements
Anillo ACT 1416. JS thanks CONICYT and Ministry of Education
of Chile, with his higher education program, for scholarship for doctoral
studies.References
1.- Tanous D, Benson LN, Horlick EM, et al. Coarctation of the aorta:
evaluation and management. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009;24(6):509-515.
2.- Malek A, Alper S, Izumo S. Hemodynamic shear stress and its role in
atherosclerosis. JAMA 1999:282:2035
3.- Barker AL, van Ooij P, Bandi K, et al. Viscous energy loss in the
presence of abnormal aortic flow. Magn Reson Med 2014, 72:620-628.
4.- Binter C, Gülan U, Holzner M, et al. On the accuracy of viscous and
turbulent loss quantification in stenotic aortic flow using phase-contrast MRI.
Magn Reson Med 8:2015.
5.- Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu JZ. The finite element method: Its basis
and fundamentals, sixth ed. London: Butterworth-Heinemann. 2005.
6.- Sotelo J, Urbina J, Valverde I, et al. 3D Quantification of Vorticity
and Helicity from 4D Flow Data Using Finite Element Interpolations. Proc 23rd
Annual Meeting ISMRM, 2015.